Takeover - Cash vs. Equity

Are the majority of takeovers these days completed through offering shareholders stakes of the acquiring company's stock, rather than paying out cash for each share?

Also, some pros/cons of each I can think of off the top of my head as I think about this. Any insight would be greatly appreciated, as I'm rather ill informed about the subject.

-Cash is generally viewed as stronger, going back to the "cash is king" concept. It gives people their money ASAP (time value of money) and allows investors to reallocate their capital as they please. Additionally, this takes out liquidity concerns for the new shares.

-Equity would allow shareholders to get a stake of the stock before it can benefit from synergies, economies of scale, etc., which would hopefully drive up its price. However, most mergers/takeovers fail, making cash superior once again.

7 Comments
 
Best Response

I would focus less on what the advantages and disadvantages of receiving stock vs. cash from the target shareholders' perspectives, and instead study reasons why the acquiring company would use cash/stock to pay for the transaction. There are a few main factors:

  1. If the acquiring company views its stock as overvalued, it will tend to use stock or a combination of cash/stock to complete the transaction
  2. Cash vs. stock is generally a decision based upon the condition of the acquiring company's balance sheet. If the company has a weak balance sheet (low cash reserves) and already has a high leverage ratio (hence limiting the amount of debt it could possibly raise), the only alternative is to use equity (although the company may want to rethink whether or not it would want to effect the transaction in such a condition).

The answer is that it depends. Most smaller acquisitions are financed through cash. When you're getting to a higher valuation for your target company, you may have to use equity or raise additional cash through debt to generate adequate financing for the transaction.

 

In general, cash deals are much easier to get done because, well, cash is cash. When you get to a huge valuation, like MSFT/YHOO, it's hard for anyone to pay $45B in cash, so stock can become necessary.

Private equity deals of course are always financed via cash as their stock would be worthless or worth much less than the company they're acquiring in the case of PE firms that are public.

Lately, some strategic deals that were cash deals financed via on-balance-sheet cash and new debt taken out have shifted to cash/stock deals because of the credit markets. This of course also lowers their chances of succeeding, as it can be very difficult to get a target to like the idea of stock unless it's Berkshire Hathaway or Google.

In general, stock is not used unless it has to be due to the size of the transaction or lack of financial resources.

 

All the points raised above are valid, but i think one of the most important points which you need to mention is that (from the acquiror's perspective) cash vs. stock will make a difference to your accretive/dilutive analysis.

 
Delirium2All the points raised above are valid, but i think one of the most important points which you need to mention is that (from the acquiror's perspective) cash vs. stock will make a difference to your accretive/dilutive analysis.
How so, if you don't mind me asking?

Less of an effect on the acquirers' EPS, if done completed through cash I am assuming.

Good thing you posted this. I need to do some further reading on accretive vs. dilutive.

 

Not necessarily true. Depends on the interest costs in a cash deal. If interest costs are very high, then cash deal could be more dilutive.

Pro forma EPS (cash deal financed through debt) = Net income (A) + Net income (T) - after-tax interest cost - after tax depreciation step up / No. of Shares (A)

Pro forma EPS (stock deal) = Net income (A) + Net income (T) - after tax depreciation step up / pro forma number of shares

 

Nulla veniam molestiae officiis voluptatem occaecati voluptatem pariatur et. Voluptatem voluptate voluptate perferendis nostrum quibusdam. Id ut ut debitis voluptate laboriosam quos dicta. Alias omnis maiores est repellendus quos.

Consequuntur voluptate odit qui et aut voluptatem. Sint repellat ipsum est ipsam. Magni cupiditate voluptatem sunt officia eaque vitae quod rerum. Et ex at ducimus cum. Accusamus necessitatibus quae quas harum aperiam dolore.

A ut mollitia ex sit. Adipisci rerum aperiam impedit non. Et aut et quia accusantium praesentium eligendi quia.

Et consequatur voluptate non dolor sequi ullam perferendis. Quae occaecati ea enim. Temporibus voluptatem ab praesentium animi. Autem pariatur odio dolores qui nam ea. Possimus aut ea ut qui natus. Alias qui dolores aut et. Ea eveniet omnis maxime quas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”