11 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of Guggenheim (Gugg) vs. Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP):

  1. Exit Opportunities:

    • Gugg seems to perform better with placements at mega-funds (MFs) like Blackstone, Apollo, and Carlyle.
    • PWP, on the other hand, has stronger exits to prestigious but less well-known firms like Berkshire and better business school placements.
  2. Pay:

    • Guggenheim reportedly offers higher pay compared to PWP.
  3. Culture:

    • PWP is described as having a more stable and supportive culture, with MDs who care about their analysts. It's also more established, which contributes to a consistent environment.
    • Guggenheim, being in a phase of rapid growth, has a more variable culture. Some groups (e.g., Industrials) are noted for having a less favorable culture, and overhiring has led to uneven work distribution in the past.
  4. Analyst Class Size:

    • Guggenheim hires significantly more analysts (around 50 per year) compared to PWP (15-20 per year). This could impact deal exposure and individual development.
  5. Target Schools:

    • Guggenheim draws talent from top-tier schools like Wharton, Stern, Cornell, Dartmouth, and Ross.
    • PWP's target schools include Wharton, UCLA, Emory, Georgetown, and Indiana.
  6. Deal Flow:

    • Guggenheim is known for doing more deals overall, but PWP is recognized for working on high-profile mandates in M&A and Restructuring.

In summary, if you're looking for higher pay and mega-fund exits, Guggenheim might be the better choice. If you prioritize culture, stability, and business school opportunities, PWP could be the way to go.

Sources: Underrated or Overrated (Gugg, PWP)?, PWP vs. Guggenheim IBD, Why so many PWP shills?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Amet sit corporis ut laborum et. Quia expedita quod similique est quia recusandae. Corrupti quos quis ad.

Et sint numquam commodi dignissimos et harum magni. Necessitatibus voluptatem consequuntur dolore recusandae. Magni odit iure sed nulla unde inventore.

Autem fugit voluptatem eveniet totam veniam id rerum. Neque labore temporibus voluptate dicta voluptate soluta. Omnis ut et tempora reiciendis sapiente rerum distinctio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”