Top BB vs Top EB for long-term career in IB
Know there have been a lot of posts in general about BB vs EB but wanted to get latest thoughts from people who have switched between BB and EB or the other way around at the VP level. The comparison here would be GS/MS/JPM vs EVR/PJT. Purposely excluded CVP because i think it would tilt the scale significantly while EVR/PJT may generate a better debate. I know general consensus is BBs are easier to make MD in but wanted to get a temperature check on whether anything has changed or is changing at EBs regarding growing their own MDs these days.
Comp at BBs (GS/MS) so far have been abysmal, in a record year for both firms, relative to EBs. Do VPs/SVPs at EVR/PJT really feel like the realistic path to MD is to switch to a BB or are they hopeful they will be at their firms for the long haul?
Nearly every SMD / partner at the EBs comes from a buldge (not even necessarily just the top ones). That’s because having a balance sheet puts you into the room with the client and the client in some way needs you. The tradeoff, as you noted, is comp that can be materially lower, so many ppl at EBs that are homegrown make it to MD (this is the stage right below partner and is essentially a senior director depending on the EB) and clip their $1mm per year with potential upside in a good year if the SMD is willing to throw you a bone. It’s not a bad life at all but you are clearly in the execution seat vs rain maker seat.
This is less spoken about, but the EB partners love to brag to clients ‘if you hire us, I’ll be involved in every aspect of the deal versus a BB which will have the VP run everything and you won’t see the MD after the pitch’…clients love hearing this, but you can imagine it doesn’t bode well for you personally if you’re the VP on that call. The client will always view you as the execution monkey and it’s really hard to step out of that frame.
ignore title, i second this
I won't ignore your title, actually. Who the fuck are you?
Do you think this is more extreme at EVR and PJT though? They didn't get the nicknames Goldman North and things like that for no reason.
Moelis claims that more than half of their MDs are homegrown, and I imagine that's similar at CVP.
Yes but making MD is like getting called up to the majors, nothing more. Most of the homegrown MDs at Moelis work for the real rainmakers who are BB guys. That’s the culture and the incentives.
CVP is very different. There are genuine stud home grown partners there. They develop their talent better than almost everywhere.
Guggenheim, EVR and PJT are pretty weak (other than RSSG) and PWP is the worst at developing home grown talent.
Isn’t the fact that nearly all senior MDs or partners come from BB just because of age of these firms? Most MDs at BBs have 20+ years in IB and back when they started their careers these EBs barely existed, or were still building up. Given how established they are today, could there be any ongoing shift? Interesting to hear that Moelis now claims ~half of their MDs are internal promotes. I wonder if EBs will forever keep this “going out of business” model for BB rainmakers.
IDK how many MDs you want PJT to home grow when they are only entering their 10th year.......
They were a spin off of BX’s advisory business so it’s a longer tenure. RSSG develops home grown partners, M&A is very bad at it
Can’t paint this with a totally broad brush. CVP is great at developing home grown talent. MOE is mediocre to ok at it. The rest are awful.
Numquam deserunt praesentium aliquam voluptas repellat et. Voluptas qui officia et quae fugit iste dolor. Pariatur aut et itaque. Reprehenderit nulla ipsam eum qui.
Consequatur aut vel et iure et accusamus. Et molestiae dolor ut voluptatem illo. Hic rerum totam vel nihil autem repellat. Ex repellat praesentium voluptate qui est doloribus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...