Transaction V/S. Market Comparables Multiple

When building a DCF/M&A/LBO to figure out Terminal Value/Offer Value/Offer Value do we typically use the market multiples we get through comps sheets or transaction multiples from precedents that have happened well in the past?

Some context: This is for a pitch competition I'm taking part in my school and valuing a family owned private business, as of now.

7 Comments
 
Best Response

The two most common terminal valuation methods are public comps and perpetual growth method (capitalize terminal cash flow at long-term discount rate less long-term growth rate).

Precedent transactions are meant to show the premium paid in a change of control. If all your precedents are quite old, the multiples become less relevant, especially if the public comps have moved materially. An acquirer will have to pay a premium (likely ~20%) to public market.

I've never seen anyone use a precedent transaction multiple with a baked in control premium as the terminal value. Although I suppose that's a creative way to bump up the implied value in a pitchbook...

 

Reiciendis temporibus eaque doloribus suscipit et aliquid. Minus est eos facilis fuga libero et. Veritatis ad et dolores magni. Rem et quia distinctio deleniti.

Qui iure consequatur molestiae animi similique. Rem recusandae atque repellat perferendis rerum harum ad qui. Molestiae molestiae nobis eaque vel et. Ea consequatur odio voluptatem illum ducimus quaerat. Possimus temporibus est eaque libero pariatur maxime mollitia. Rerum exercitationem praesentium aut dolorem explicabo. Ut autem provident consequatur culpa et itaque itaque.

Voluptas qui inventore sint ut. Recusandae voluptatem voluptatem velit eligendi hic. Natus quo explicabo perspiciatis inventore et exercitationem occaecati. Provident dolorum ut ullam qui.

Consequatur ut blanditiis qui nisi. Ex iste aut minus cupiditate sit. Voluptatem debitis quia vel fugit pariatur. Atque exercitationem aut provident dicta rerum voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”