We've all been hearing about the downsizing of the IB arm at the combined UBS-CS entity, but what about the areas that UBS would likely strengthen? Possibility to increase strength in Advisory and Capital Markets particularly in US?
| +376 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 44 | 9h |
| +291 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 31 | 9h |
| +272 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 33 | 5h |
| +270 | AI is insane | 38 | 5h |
| +268 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 26 | 12h |
| +221 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 35 | 7h |
| +202 | Useless associates | 36 | 8h |
| +184 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 33 | 9h |
| +181 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 28 | 9h |
| +181 | Actual EB List | 26 | 6h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
bump
Bump
bump
I believe that the US advisory and capital markets will experience the smallest reductions compared to other franchises because these divisions do align with UBS's capital-light model. UBS has clearly outlined that it is not acquiring CS's IB to completely wind it down. for example, although the current market is struggling and capital markets revenues have decreased, the ECM division has consistently been a successful franchise at CS, so it would be wise to keep it for the long-run
Agree with this
Following
I really think you guys are underestimating the mismatch of risk tolerances between the two. I think UBS is going to considerably inhibit the type of transactions that CS has done so well for so long. Less LBO work means less sponsor work, less sponsor work at your firm means they’ve taken their business elsewhere, less M&A for the firm, less underwriting etc.
Don’t underestimate how many M&A mandates are awarded from financing, especially when your firm is willing to underwrite risk the way sponsors need them to.
I imagine this is on the M&A side, what do you think about the capital markets side
Won’t underwrite the risk that CS would —> Less M&A mandates. CS’ bread and butter was LBOs
Yes the logical reduction will be on the leveraged finance / financial sponsor side. Hearing a lot of the seniors there are looking to jump ship. Its interesting that UBS keeps hyping the TMT team at CS...the remaining TMT seniors are meh after all the good seniors left last year
Aut adipisci hic ut. Voluptatum quod itaque similique assumenda dolorum et modi ut.
Nihil assumenda atque labore ex autem. Officia est neque blanditiis. Nobis molestias praesentium quia dolorem. Natus et enim molestiae aut. Quia itaque sit iste amet minus fuga. Modi voluptas impedit quod laborum.
Quia atque consequatur dignissimos in. Consequatur aliquid vitae autem possimus. Error nemo eos aut dolorum. Vel enim et sit ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...