Walk me through an increase of $10 in Accounts Receivable?

Why do the explanations for this always disregard COGS? I am only talking about the change’s effect on the Income Statement in terms of accrual accounting. Tell me if I’m wrong:

A $10 increase in accounts receivable increases revenue by $10, and assuming a 20% effective tax rate, increases net income by $8.

But this disregards any expense that should be recognized for COGS (according to the matching principle). Why?

7 Comments
 

An increase in AR doesn't directly affect COGS. The COGS has already been recognized when the sale was made. The increase in accounts receivable just means that the cash has not been collected yet.

 
Most Helpful

You’re not necessarily wrong - there’s just more to it, and your explanation is a little off.

There are one or two correct journal entries that could be made:

  1. De. AR / Cr. Revenue

and (for a goods/products company)

  1. De. COGS / Cr. Inventory.

One simple answer could be that not all firms would have COGS (i.e- services company) from an increase in AR, which would make this explanation for the income statement correct. For a products company, the second journal entry wouldn’t be disregarded and would decrease the marginal revenue by COGS before making to down to net income.

However, these questions are generally meant to pose a simple scenario for you to demonstrate your knowledge of how changes flow through the financial statements. A more appropriate answer that would be expected to this question is that the increase in AR does increase revenue->net income on the income statement, but also that it increases working capital (via the balance sheet), which would be a non-cash change in accruals that would decrease CFO on the statement of cash flows. Hope that helps.

 

Thank you so much for the detailed and straightforward explanation! In an interview, do we want to ask about the type of the company or assume it is services-based for simplicity purposes? Would you say the reason most guides don’t refer to COGS in this question is for simplicity and assuming not all companies have inventory?

 

No problem, we all start somewhere. I would say especially for internships and entry-level roles, most interviewers are not looking to trip you up on a technicality like whether or not a company has COGs. If there’s key information to lead you toward that sort of conclusion, 9/10x it will be given to you with the question. If there’s no special info given, you’re probably safe with simplicity.

 

Might be wrong here, but it could also be due to deferred revenues*. ARs can rise w/o an increase in COGS if a company bills / invoices its customers for goods sold, but not yet delivered. Because of this, the company isn't required to record the revenue and the corresponding expense at that point in time. 

Based on this, cash would be unchanged and the both sides of the balance sheet remain equal since the rise in AR is met with a corresponding rise in liabilities (via deferred revenues). 

*Initially thought that accounts receivable was only to be recognized for earned revenues (and thus contingent on delivery), but I think you're allowed to recognize billed, unearned revenues so long as you have a contractual right to collect the cash. If anyone thinks I'm off base, feel free to correct since I'm still learning too.

 

Aut id ipsa tempora architecto consequatur. Et et et incidunt omnis voluptates tenetur. Aspernatur vero reprehenderit a exercitationem. Vitae iste voluptatem adipisci ut mollitia voluptatem sunt vel. Eos ab consequatur est sint iure. Repellendus accusamus sunt deleniti culpa sit ratione veritatis perferendis.

Nihil iusto in sapiente et. Quam occaecati beatae et omnis voluptatem maxime eligendi voluptatem. Consequatur sunt dolore rerum.

Assumenda sint sapiente consequuntur est. Pariatur blanditiis quia quidem et debitis voluptas. Et deserunt accusamus quibusdam rerum quasi nobis. Odio consequatur sed quis libero temporibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”