What "REAL" skillset does IB build?

After working in IB for 5 years, I took an interview in my first non-finance / banking role. It was for a large F500 company for business development. Throughout the interview as the interviewers are asking me these questions to get a grasp for my skillsets. I realized besides from knowing how to run financial models, put together good looking slides. I haven't really built any skills. Does anyone think differently?

 

You learn how to deal with a bunch of insecure people

 
Most Helpful

Skills you learn as a senior ASO (or should learn - seems like BBs do not provide good deal experience)

- Manage both internal (top and down, from MD to analyst) and client working team to ensure the process runs smoothly and set correct expectations whilst pushing back when possible

- Be able to run vanilla sellside / buyside M&A process and identify/front load some of the heavy work during both phase 1 and 2 (IM, MP, DD process) with the ability to structure and sketch out the outline of key deliverables (thinking how you can position the company to be attractive, what are the key investor concerns, who are the investors/targets that the client will be interested in, etc)

- Ability to identify key investment highlights of a company (their industry position, key revenue and cost drivers, growth capex plans, etc.) which will be useful on point #2 as well as negotiation phase during DD and drafting transaction docs and setting the valuation floor

- Run a full valuation model whilst conversing with the CFO/finance team and be able to discuss valuation adjustments points if possible (one off adjustments etc to either decrease/increase the price offer price)

At least above is the top bucket ASO/VP expectation in EB with generalist roots. Might differ from group/bank

 
Controversial

- People skills is a soft skill, i think it's very important but it's not a tangible skill that you can just showcase during an interview

- Understanding a M&A process just requires you to run a few deals, not transferable outside of banking or M&A related roles

- Identifying key investment highlights, really? You think the slides you put together showing key transaction rationale or investment thesis are the reasons why the deal create IRR for the buyer. If you seriously think the key investment highlight is the reason why investors invest in the deal, then it's delusional. If anything, this falls under you're good at putting slides

- Valuation model falls in my comments about how to run financial models

What other skills have i built for myself?

 

I hate to say it but the way you describe and gloss over these things makes me agree with you. Feels like you really haven't developed or understood the skillset as an associate. If you're limited to running financial models and putting together slides as an ASO2, buddy, "behind the curve" is the understatement of the year.

1. The entire interview is a way to showcase your soft skills, tf? I don't even understand this logic

2.  There's understanding the steps in an M&A process, and there's running one. Process beta is a thing, deal tactics are a thing, deal tension is a thing. People who know how to run a tight process know how to create value from doing just that. Crazy right?  

3. Key investment highlights are a selling point. They're a hook. It's the elevator pitch to a buyer who doesn't want to read the rest of your shitty teaser. The easy way is formulaic, TAM growth margins boring af blah blah. The harder but more effective way is to be thoughtful and tailor it, which comes from a deeper understanding of industry, business profile etc. 

4. Running financial models is easy af. Any idiot can pick that up between YouTube and all the resources available online. Can you drive a value conversation with C-suite? Can you bridge value gaps between buyers / sellers? Can you drive incremental value for your client beyond what your football field shows?

Great list as it was, I actually disagree with the guy who posted it. This should not be top bucket Aso expectations, let alone VP. This should be the standard for an ASO2 and above. I would even argue some of this shit is analyst3 stuff. 

You can sit down, write a bullet by bullet rebuttal, why none of what I wrote is a "skillset" or whatever and how it doesn't make sense. Or you can take the time to sit down and introspect over why an analyst2 has a better handle and view into skill development as a banking junior than an ASO2. I've said this many a time, beyond the basic modeling/analysis shit, a lot of the growth and development in banking is self-driven. What you take out of it is hugely dependent on how you approach it. 

 
  • Being able to run a tight process is certainly important in banking. If you’re at a shop that runs a lot of process then you can certainly pick that up, unfortunately the market has been dead over the past 2 years for me to run enough process during my associate years. It definitely hurt me. I will be surprise if associate will be doing the negotiation and majority of the talking with potential buyers.

  • I will be very surprise if people don’t copy and paste majority of your slides from prior deals. Sure, you will make updates to certain information to be specific to the deal but the majority of the touch points are essentially identical. No need to reinvent the wheel and most CIMs are cookie cutter template. I will be surprise if your last investment thesis isn’t something along the line of well experience management with x years of experience in x industry.

  • If you think most management have any idea about what are the right assumption to use in financial models then you’re kidding yourself. Projection until end of the year and 1 year out assuming there’s no major headwind and tailwind to the industry, sure. But no one could truly project out the company’s performance, unless it’s a relatively stable business with minimum upsize or downsize.

    To say that this is all the job of a 2nd analyst it’s crazy, maybe I’m just dumb. But I don’t even think some VP could run a tight process, given how fast we promo in banking over the years. If you’re at an EB or top MM that does do a lot of volume and process, I’m sure you will be great at your job by associate. To say that you do all of this as 2nd year is unbelievable. Most of the 2nd years at my firm are heading toward PE and barely even working past 10pm.
 

Agree with you on most points though don't think AN3 can drive the process as smooth as senior ASO (maybe vanilla sellside M&A in a simple industry). Once you add in complexities of it being cross border / multiple shareholders with different incentives / publicly listed / in a niche-ish industry (FIG, renewables, O&G etc.), I think it can quickly dive into hairy M&A transaction

 

I think you hit the nail. "Transferable" skills is probably the better term.

 

As a banker, you should already be able to twist your way to make the mundane stuff you've done into "transferrable skills." But here's some examples:

  • Running sale / buyside process (who gives a shit if you actually did or not, just say "potential" and that the deal died but you got responsibility): this equates to project management and driving accountability. Ex: Managing multiple parties, driving towards deadlines with key deliverables, etc. Not exactly useless. Hell, even put negotiations on there (which can be used for anything else - vendors, customer contracts, anything that requires a counterparty)
  • Financial models and valuation = Analytical skills / building frameworks. A financial model is at its core an analytical framework to put hard numbers on high level hocus pocus bullshit. You need this for a vast majority of roles, whether it's product management, budgeting, Ops, etc
  • Making slide decks = being able to turn anything into a story, which is applicable for everything (sales, PM, anything that requires exec buy-in). Sure sounds soft as shit, but presenting a shit fucking company as a diamond in the rough means you can grasp what people care about and cater to that.
  • C-Suite conversations and internal management are soft skills for sure, but you get the point I'm trying to make

Put on your banker hat and sell your shit experience as a shiny best-in-class whatever the fuck - that's like the whole point.

 

Do you think it’s ok over stating your experience? Obviously I’m not going to interview for some shitty job. For example, some of the guys interviewing me are ex MBB consultants with M7 MBA. And they obviously know what I do, what are some concrete things that I can say while being genuine? In my case, I’m interviewing for Manager / Director level business development jobs for a F500 company.

 

Could you elaborate more on what your BD role's responsibilities are? Sounds like more or less relationship development that is of sales nature where your KPI would be composed of things like # of new clients onboarded / revenue generated from clients etc. If it is the case, then the ability to (i) craft an entailing story around a company's product / services, (ii) provide analytical outputs, (iii) manage internal / external workflows and (iv) have the soft skills to mange counterparties (i.e. managing expectations, negotiating terms with potential clients) are by all means important skillsets to do the job. Obviously going from IB to corporate world requires a transition but that doesn't necessarily mean it's nothing alike. You're only an associate and likely will have a few seniors a the firm to walk you through the process.

 

I'm not familiar with the corporate latter but getting a director title at F500 at the age of 27 sounds super early

 

Idk about how you define "skillset" but i think majority of ex-IB/bankers has some of this qualities that users/recruiters would value:

1. Running multiple complex workstreams which might be perceived as good project management, managing people/parties, and ability to quickly shift focus. (Most non-IB people would be absolutely overwhelmed with 2/3 separate work streams but in IB it's a slow month)

2. Critical thinking in terms of business acumen, you might not pick up any critical business acumen skills during your stint (which is awful for you tbh) but exposure to different business process and how they generate revenue could translate to much better business sense (maybe not sector specific sense) than non-bankers

3. Modelling is overrated IMO since most large companies would just hand that over to the big4 people, but the way that you can put an interesting and actionable story out of those models to your board/IC/banks is definitely a great skill to have.

4. Last but not least, while this may not be a skill but knowing the sector/business network and how to leverage those network could be an incredible asset to have. I personally known someone who was hired as a Manager but rose to senior VP in less than 2 years in industry simply he knew who to contact to drive their projects forward or even develop their own projects and deliver it to the board/IC.  

Honestly think of yourself as your own CIM, make the interviewer hooked on your story and "value", create a believable yet optimistic story tailor-made to their needs and you basically would get at least to the final interview stage (barring any technical tests beforehand). Figure yourself out and act as your own salesman.

 

This post reminds me of an episode of Shark Tank.  There were two young female founders, some kind of consumer business.  One had a typical founder background (she worked in the relevant industry for a while, learned some things, figured out a need where she could start a business).  The other was ex IB.  Both were natural presenters and the pitch is going well enough. 

Then one of the sharks asks them to each explain what skills each of them brings to the table.  The first girl says industry knowledge, connections etc.  Then it's the former IB girl's turn to answer and she just says "execution."  Just that one word.  And the sharks laugh them out of the room.  

 

100% agree. I know exactly which episode you’re talking about. I do think banking offers a very unique experience and makes people much more polish than their age. Execution is only useful in banking, and if you can run a tight process then you will be a great associate / VP.

After 5 years in banking, I realized that you need a very unique personality to succeed in banking and become BSD. I worked with a lot of MD throughout my career (15+) and the good MD are truly in it for the long term and they live and breath client relationship / M&A. I realized that I’m never going to be them and I need to build some real skills in an industry so I can be successful in my own ways.

 

Totam sed placeat quis tempora in hic. Et molestiae excepturi similique sapiente quae. Non et tempore facere amet ipsa. Pariatur nemo nam accusantium unde. Et eum nisi aut ipsam est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”