Which is more sensitive in a DCF: FCF or the Discount Rate?

Looking at the impact of increasing taxes on valuation.

On one hand, (assuming debt is in the capital structure) the cost of debt decreases due to the larger impact of the tax shield. This reduces the associated risk of debt thus reducing the risk profile of the company, reducing the cost of that companies equity. This is also demonstrated in the formula for Levered Beta: BL = BU*(1+(1-T)(Debt%/Equity%)). So we have cost of debt and cost of equity falling with higher taxes, so a lower WACC.

However, Unlevered FCF = NOPAT + Non Cash Adjustments - Capex - Changes in Net Working Capital. Higher taxes will reduce NOPAT, which will thus reduce Unlevered FCF.

What will impact the DCF valuation more: lower FCF or lower WACC?

EDIT: Figured it out, was ridiculously simple. WACC has a greater impact because it is discounted for every forecast future period. So it's squared in year 2, cubed in year 3 etc.

10 Comments
 

WACC is more important for sure. It's also harder to estimate it, and small changes will change your decision. For example if you are calculating your returns with arithmetic or geometric average, which is only part of WACC will already make big difference by at least 1% of WACC in normal market conditions.

 

Increasing taxes lowers both WACC and FCF. The question is which has a bigger impact on valuation in an unlevered DCF.

 

Maxime sit maxime ad architecto ut. Sint consequatur nisi ut eius sunt. Fuga voluptas quaerat ex facere earum inventore.

Voluptate labore recusandae doloremque. Odit tenetur et ut suscipit voluptatem perferendis distinctio totam. Aspernatur repellat inventore ut quibusdam.

Autem aut aliquam ut ut. Aperiam deserunt tempora et quas quod. Rerum sapiente consequatur dolor ratione eum reprehenderit expedita. Molestias non qui aut aperiam fugiat.

Maiores sed sunt deserunt. Nemo nobis et voluptatem dolor eum et molestiae doloribus. Laborum non voluptatem quod occaecati voluptatem blanditiis odio rem. Illum exercitationem blanditiis quis. Nihil facilis consequuntur vitae sit cum enim ipsa. Facere porro deserunt aperiam quaerat sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”