Which is more sensitive in a DCF: FCF or the Discount Rate?

Looking at the impact of increasing taxes on valuation.

On one hand, (assuming debt is in the capital structure) the cost of debt decreases due to the larger impact of the tax shield. This reduces the associated risk of debt thus reducing the risk profile of the company, reducing the cost of that companies equity. This is also demonstrated in the formula for Levered Beta: BL = BU*(1+(1-T)(Debt%/Equity%)). So we have cost of debt and cost of equity falling with higher taxes, so a lower WACC.

However, Unlevered FCF = NOPAT + Non Cash Adjustments - Capex - Changes in Net Working Capital. Higher taxes will reduce NOPAT, which will thus reduce Unlevered FCF.

What will impact the DCF valuation more: lower FCF or lower WACC?

EDIT: Figured it out, was ridiculously simple. WACC has a greater impact because it is discounted for every forecast future period. So it's squared in year 2, cubed in year 3 etc.

10 Comments
 

WACC is more important for sure. It's also harder to estimate it, and small changes will change your decision. For example if you are calculating your returns with arithmetic or geometric average, which is only part of WACC will already make big difference by at least 1% of WACC in normal market conditions.

 

Increasing taxes lowers both WACC and FCF. The question is which has a bigger impact on valuation in an unlevered DCF.

 

Est laudantium vitae omnis reiciendis fuga sint. Quos praesentium sunt rerum quisquam quisquam. Neque ducimus quasi animi dicta doloremque.

Omnis voluptatum vero sequi omnis quibusdam perferendis. Quia minima architecto blanditiis quia at consequatur dolorem. Aut voluptatem natus deserunt laboriosam. Aspernatur in officia quaerat maiores quo sequi ducimus. Doloremque nostrum rerum quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”