Why does LMM get hate?
Genuinely curious here and from an outsider’s perspective, why do people hate on LMM IB and PE? From my perspective, it seems like they get a much more interesting view of businesses in key growth stages and access to interesting founders. And the work is genuinely impactful, making things happen rather than robotically cost cutting in some big stable business.
Does the hate come purely from a prestige and compensation perspective? Always see places like GP Bullhound get hate on here but as far as I can see they have a strong track record of working on amazing businesses in key stages that then go on to do huge things.
The skepticism or "hate" towards LMM (Lower Middle Market) IB and PE often stems from a combination of factors, many of which are tied to perceptions of prestige, compensation, and career trajectory. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:
Prestige and Exit Opportunities:
Compensation:
Perceived Lack of Structure and Resources:
Deal Size and Complexity:
Misconceptions and Bias:
Cultural Perceptions:
Despite these perceptions, many professionals in the LMM space highlight the benefits, such as greater responsibility, closer relationships with clients, and the opportunity to make a tangible impact on businesses. As you mentioned, working with companies in key growth stages and engaging with founders can be incredibly fulfilling and provide a unique skill set that is transferable to other industries or entrepreneurial ventures.
I purposefully pivoted away from LMM M&A because A) the deals really aren’t economically important in the grand scheme of things other than for the founder and your MD’s pockets - this is attached to prestige. B) less stringency on modelling which slowed my development. C) much less optionality to move down the line. D) usually these LMM shops are pure churn mode on deals and don’t actually care about fighting for the best outcome on the deal which made me more bored and more indifferent to the founders.
Personally I enjoyed strategic advisory/retainer based IB roles more like CVP’s/Ondra Partners business model so I pivoted into there (I work for neither). LMM work is largely the same as UMM work though for a junior - not much difference. Will also say it was cool working with founders and that’s definitely a unique element of LMM
Thanks for your response and that all makes sense. How does the culture compare between LMM and what you pivoted to? Not completely against the career banker route so I’d be curious to hear the comparison.
Reiciendis animi dignissimos quis quia sit eos et. Consectetur odit maiores dolor id nesciunt dolores. Iusto ut odit illo.
Reiciendis et nihil rerum nulla et. Ut ut et enim placeat. Maxime et rerum dolor ullam quidem.
Et error quia doloremque sunt quia. Ad facere sapiente ipsum.
Quo blanditiis deleniti voluptates non. Incidunt voluptatem dolor non tempore quo fugiat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...