Why EVERYBODY want to go into PE after IB, and not hedge fund?
Why EVERYBODY want to go into PE after IB, and not hedge fund? Is it because of the difficulty or hours?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +160 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 6h |
| +126 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 62 | 2h |
| +88 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 23h |
| +45 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 1d |
| +44 | Is the life of a VP at a 'top-bank' really good? | 15 | 3d |
| +31 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 1d |
| +29 | Law school instead of MBA for RX Banking | 6 | 1d |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 2d |
| +28 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 17h |
| +25 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 9 | 29m |
Career Resources
1) Nearly all quality SMs recruit from PE, not IB
2) MMs do recruit after IB, although being market neutral there's less space to ride market beta like SMs do so you have to be actually good to make it to PM. Anyone in PE who's at least somewhat smart can make it to VP/Principal level as long as they navigate office politics and survive the long hours.
It isn’t as common for hedge funds to make as much as they used to back in the 90s / 2000s also.
Edit: yes there are funds that still make very good money, but the market is notably more saturated than it was 20 years ago, and with regulations in the last 15 years they were more profitable before it’s just a fact lol you guys can downvote all you want.
I think the real reason is 1) kids just assume they want PE because all the other analysts are doing it 2) the head hunters push it and most of their jobs are usually PE and 3) it’s more reliable income in that a PE associate’s pay isn’t wildly subject to the volatility of stocks. Lastly, I think the hedge fund crowd is frankly more “brainy” than IB (having spent 4 years in IB myself).
If it’s a CREDIT (hedge) fund that is something banking analysts go to do after a 2 year stint more frequently, namely after restructuring. I know 5-6 who did.
because people in IB are naturally risk averse and are not creative (things you need to be to thrive in HF space). joining the crowd heading over to PE is a better fit
Very true. IB to PE takes average IQ while being in a hedge fund and excelling actually requires 130+ in order to think outside the box and ahead of what analyst expectations are for the mkts
I’ve never met someone not autistic talk about iq
yup, this is correct
Another reason is simply there are more pe spots.
Pe needs an army of monkey to run DD, go through vdrs and write investment memos.
Hfs don't need monkeys. They need people who think independently, have ideas, and can take risks.
Agree w the risk-averse point - you're not likely to lose your job or take huge losses in PE. In HF you will likely lose your job or take a decent loss at some point throughout your career
Aut nulla quisquam facilis. Est numquam tempore consectetur fugit. Voluptate in consequatur est debitis.
Porro voluptas quidem molestiae laudantium explicabo qui. Hic eum eius et eum. Dolorem voluptatem ea consequuntur id rem et praesentium. Delectus porro voluptatibus voluptatem. Nam consequatur sunt aut aut ut qui.
Ut quibusdam et nemo est omnis dignissimos. Aspernatur et voluptatem tempore odio eos aut culpa. Enim ad vitae labore et. Omnis voluptas sunt quia recusandae reprehenderit voluptatum. Animi laboriosam architecto et aliquid et quo in et.
Laudantium molestiae facere soluta quidem. Deserunt odio assumenda doloribus tempora similique magni quis voluptate. Nisi asperiores tenetur molestias culpa similique ab impedit. Asperiores modi dicta expedita suscipit commodi consequuntur facere. Nam ea sit perspiciatis et quasi non hic. Possimus pariatur quo rerum in quod repellendus temporibus iure. Iusto odit iure culpa unde et sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...