I understand that we have to do it so that our multiples are consistent. But I don't understand why minority interest is not already included in the EqV. According to IFRS, minority interest is booked in equity on the balance sheet. Why do we have to add it again in the bridge?
I would appreciate an explanation!
| +273 | Earliest you can get fired | 58 | 1d |
| +252 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 1d |
| +216 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 45 | 1d |
| +215 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 1d |
| +206 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 41 | 1d |
| +131 | Is UBS really that bad? | 38 | 1d |
| +40 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 14h |
| +28 | NYU Stern Transfer from non-target Is Paradise | 9 | 39m |
| +27 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 8 | 1d |
| +27 | 2026-27 IB Energy Top Banks | 8 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Minority interest is the remaining part equity holders don’t own in a subsidiary. For that reason I like to think of it as debt and therefore not part of equity value
Adipisci aliquam consequatur soluta vel blanditiis molestiae. Officiis quia id magni ipsam. Ipsa error omnis ut nam distinctio quibusdam quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...