Black Jack's Recruiting Advice

I received a lot of PMs over the past month asking me for advice/resume help/etc with people seeing that I had had a lot of success landing interviews at many places. I will preface this by saying that I am not in the industry, and like many of you am just trying to break in. I was able to land a top notch job for this summer, despite that fact that I don't go to one of the main targets (I'm a non target for most firms), I don't have above a 3.7, and I have virtually no finance background (1 pretty solid soph internship).

There are things I did wrong in the recruiting process, but for the most part I think I approached it the right way, and I wanted to share some of what I think made me successful with you others who are in or soon to be in a similar position. I'm going to post some stats/firms, not to gloat but merely to show that someone without amazing stats can compete with the best of them.

1st rounds: Baird, Sandler, KBW, Simmons, Blair, Lincoln, Jefferies, RBS, UBS, Gleacher, Centerview, Greenhill, Morgan Stanley, Goldman (New York, Chicago, and San Fran offices), JP Morgan, Blackstone M&A, Lazard MM, Oppenheimer, Nomura

Of the above, I received a super day with 14/21 (including the 3 Goldman offices).

The Resume: Having a strong and polished resume is one of the main things that WSO and other sources emphasize, and this is really a no-brainer. Not worth even going into further detail here. Have a 3.5 or above (unless you go to a school where everyone has a 3.95), do an internship sophomore summer (I always push federal reserve, wealth management is fine, anything else is good too). Then have things on your resume that aren't finance. Most of my interviews were spent talking about my interests, hobbies, items on resume unrelated to the job directly. I have been sent a couple of resumes from people on here where interests involves tutoring in math and investing/being on the investment club- (not to throw anyone under the bus)- finance clubs and that show interest in the industry, but you need to seem like an interesting person- you like to travel, play a sport, play an instrument- I think of the top 75% of a resume (academics and experience) as the qualifications, and the bottom 25% as a way to show why someone would enjoy working with you.

Technicals: I'm from a non-finance background, but I learned most of the basic technicals this fall. End of the day, there are a few questions that get asked and that you should know. There is no excuse not to know them besides laziness, because they are not complicated concepts.

3 ways to value a company
DCF- know it inside and out- discount rate, free cash flows, etc.
Accounting- there are about 5-7 questions asked about occurrences and how they affect the 3 statements, know them.

On occasion I was asked more detailed options/LBO questions, but this happened 1 or 2 times. The technical questions (besides at a few shops or with a few stiffs who went to Michigan/Wharton and think they are the end all be all of the interview) don't matter much at all. If you don't know a question don't panic, try to solve it, or say you haven't learned it and ask them to help you through it. The stuff isn't rocket science, and if you don't know something it is likely a matter of you haven't been exposed to it but could learn it in a minute if you were taught it. But if you don't get an offer/super day, it probably is not the technicals that did you in- unless it is a purely technical interview, these questions are a fraction of the total assessment.

Networking: Networking sucks. You go into an info session, you think of some questions to ask people from the firm (you already know the answer to all of your own questions), you try to get a business card, and you follow up by email. It sucks, but everyone knows it sucks, so play the game and just do it. Here are some things networking wise that really helped me out:

1. The line between persistent/enthusiastic and annoying: This is everyones biggest fear, and it is for me as well. Networking is all a fine line between showing someone you are interested in the position and industry, talking to them and building a relationship, and generally getting them to like you without thinking you are annoying. There is no special way to do this- you know if you're being annoying.

2. Building a relationship: Something that was particularly effective for me was building a long term relationship with alumni or other people at firms. I reached out to a number of them during my sophomore year (towards the end of the firms' recruiting), and was unsuccessful in getting interviews at their firms. However, I contacted them again many months later (same email chain), and picked up interviews this year for every firm. The reason- if an alum gets 20 emails from students in October wanting to discuss the position, and he knows that one of them emailed (and in my case spoke with) him back the previous February, who will he be more inclined to help out? These people don't want to feel used, so the more you can convince them that you don't just want a referral the better. This is not to say you should be reaching out to contacts 2 years in advance (see the fine line between persistence and annoying), but try not to reach out to them in December or January when your intentions are obvious.

3. The phone call. There is no reason to not set up phone calls with alums and people at firms- most are willing to chat on the phone for 20-30 mins. In an email don't ask for a job but ask to learn about their experience with the firm. And when you talk to them do the same- people, particularly older people, like talking about themselves and looking back on their own pasts- questions like "how has the firm changed, what made you interested in xxx sector or in investment banking, what has made you successful in your role," are great. Don't try to impress someone with knowledge of the markets, the industry, or the expertise you picked up working 8 weeks at a PWM shop. They spend their entire work week talking about this stuff, and the last thing they want to do is talk more about it with a 19 year old with an ignorant opinion on it (you older guys can feel free to disagree with that). At the end of the phone call asking for advice on internships, advice on interviews, advice on recruiting in general is a great way to wrap up. And guess what, not every one of these phone calls will lead to an interview or referral or anything- but a good number will.

4. Getting interviews: I've come to the conclusion over the past few months that if you have solid experience and a solid GPA at a good (not necessarily target) school, there is no reason to not get an interview most everywhere. I approached the recruiting process with this attitude, and save for a few places where I was referred to HR by very senior contacts and didn't get interviews, I was successful. If there is any alumni base at a firm then follow the networking steps above. If there are not then here are a few things that worked for me. Also this stuff has been said before in other threads as well.

1. Cold calling- I called a few firms and just asked to speak with who was in charge of recruiting. HR plays a bigger role than you would think, and at many of the smaller firms there is no real HR but rather an associate who handles recruiting- if you can get in touch with this person you are golden- Greenhill and Lincoln are examples of 2 shops where the intern program is run by an actual banker. I landed a few interviews just by calling the main offices, getting in touch with these people, having a conversation (as described earlier), and them simply offering me an interview.

2. Look for people with connections- if you go to Yale email someone at the firm from Harvard. Michigan? Email someone from Wisconsin. If you grew up in LA email someone who went to school at USC. If you played football in college find someone else who was on their college football team. Even high schools- you would be shocked at the strength of networks like Deerfield, Exeter, Andover- I didn't go to any of these places, but things like that can be huge.

5. The interviews: Once you get to an interview it is all on you- doesn't really matter what experience you have, what your GPA is, or anything (I'm sure it is different at different places). If they choose to interview you they usually have decided you are qualified. So now you need to be personable, you need to present yourself well, and you need to be likable. The last 1 is far and away the most important, and there is not a way to teach that. Practice makes perfect- I had the opportunity to do a bunch of mock interviews, and the more comfortable you are with your story the better. Practice walking through a DCF, talking about your summer job experience, explaining what stories you have been following in the markets.

Try not to sound rehearsed- tell your stories and thoughts as if you are having them at the time, not as if you are reading them from a script. Cliche as it is, the best interviews are like a conversation- they aren't reading from a list of questions, but rather asking you something and then delving deeper into that because you have hooked them. Like I said before, if you get that interview they know you are qualified (particularly for a super day)- at this point it is about them thinking you can do the work and liking you.

You need to be fluid, smooth, and confident. Confidence is king- look like you want to do the job and will be able to do the job, and you'll do great. At the same time, there is a fine line between confidence and cockiness, and you have to know it- you aren't entitled to anything, compared to even the worst analyst at the worst firm (might be an exaggeration) you know nothing, and you should come in trying to get the message across that you want to work hard and you are hungry to learn as much as possible. I know in a few super days it was intimidating for me to be up against kids from stronger finance backgrounds with nicer suits, rolex watches, and all that jazz, don't let it change your game plan.

Anyways, that is all I got- hope it useful to some of you, and best of luck to everyone still in the process. It is truly an unnecessarily miserable time.

 

Wow, great post. I'm going through the process now, and can definitely attest to the vast majority of what you said. Appreciate the advice and insight.

"Money is a scoreboard where you can rank how you're doing against other people." -Mark Cuban
 
MinneBanker:
Also you probably don't know but what is your conversion rate for your 14 superdays?

This won't be a satisfying answer, but I have no idea. I only attended 3 super days, and of those, 2 of them I was set to hear back next week (but have since informed them and withdrawn myself from the process). I had scheduling conflicts and was unable to attend 4, and the rest were all scheduled for either this next week or the week after (RBS the 15th for example).

 

'if you have solid experience and a solid GPA at a good (not necessarily target) school, there is no reason to not get an interview most everywhere' - I am the exception to this rule. At a target, solid GPA, solid experience yet I landed only 1 first round interview.

Probably applies to the USA only?

 
Black Jack:
4. Getting interviews: I've come to the conclusion over the past few months that if you have solid experience and a solid GPA at a good (not necessarily target) school, there is no reason to not get an interview most everywhere. I approached the recruiting process with this attitude, and save for a few places where I was referred to HR by very senior contacts and didn't get interviews, I was successful. If there is any alumni base at a firm then follow the networking steps above. If there are not then here are a few things that worked for me. Also this stuff has been said before in other threads as well.

Great advice, but I have to disagree with the part above. I obviously can't know what is about you or your resume that got you so many interviews but as a junior (non-target) with a high GPA and better work experience then probably 80% of candidates I was only able to land 2 BB interviews, and both were due to contacts.

One of them, I am going to a super day and the other I still haven't even had first rounds with.

But regardless, congratulations! It seems to me that you really earned it.

Because when you're in a room full of smart people, smart suddenly doesn't matter—interesting is what matters.
 
ricky212:
Black Jack:
4. Getting interviews: I've come to the conclusion over the past few months that if you have solid experience and a solid GPA at a good (not necessarily target) school, there is no reason to not get an interview most everywhere. I approached the recruiting process with this attitude, and save for a few places where I was referred to HR by very senior contacts and didn't get interviews, I was successful. If there is any alumni base at a firm then follow the networking steps above. If there are not then here are a few things that worked for me. Also this stuff has been said before in other threads as well.

Great advice, but I have to disagree with the part above. I obviously can't know what is about you or your resume that got you so many interviews but as a junior (non-target) with a high GPA and better work experience then probably 80% of candidates I was only able to land 2 BB interviews, and both were due to contacts.

One of them, I am going to a super day and the other I still haven't even had first rounds with.

But regardless, congratulations! It seems to me that you really earned it.

My point wasn't that if you have a high GPA and good experience and apply you WILL get an interview everywhere. The point was that if you do, there is no reason for you not to- you still need to network all the same and work your tail off, but those sorts of stats aren't going to get you dinged if you do the right things and get your resume in front of the right people. If you network properly and make the right connections, a 3.5 with a solid internship from a good school is enough (for the majority of places). If you think you have these stats and aren't having success, you probably aren't networking the right way.

 

How crucial was being in touch with people early on? You mentioned that you reached out to people in your sophomore year for SA recruiting. Did all of those contacts yield good results for this year's process?

 
orangebull:
How crucial was being in touch with people early on? You mentioned that you reached out to people in your sophomore year for SA recruiting. Did all of those contacts yield good results for this year's process?

As I mentioned a little bit, reaching out to them my sophomore year was very important. I reached out to a bunch while looking for sophomore internships, and after speaking them/learning they only hired juniors, they encouraged me to reach back out again in the fall. When I did this, it looked particularly well. I didn't approach it with the intention of establishing a long term contact, but if you are being polite and not annoying I don't think that is a horrible idea either.

More importantly if you can't do that is to reach out to them before the process for recruiting begins to establish some sort of relationship in the early fall or before other people start doing the same. You can reach out to hundreds of people and get all sorts of 'referrals' (and I did this as well to some degree), but if they don't give a shit about your application status or you in general, it doesn't really matter. When the contacts begin to feel like they have a stake in how you are doing, then you are golden and it will go a long way.

 

You did not get a BX M&A (NYC) offer with that profile. Maybe you got a first round with heavy networking, but doubt you got past it with your resume. Calling BS.

BX M&A is almost entirely Harvard / Wharton, with like 1 kid from UVA, 1 from Illinois, and a few from other ivies. All of them know their shit incredibly well, and have sky high GPAs (none that i know of with sub 3.7. most are 3.8+.). And many of them had bulge bracket ibd sophomore internships.

Maybe i'm misreading your definition of "top notch," but nothing else on that list is "top notch" - except for 2 groups at GS and 1 at MS. And no group-specific offers have gone out yet from those places yet as far as i'm aware.

 
FernandoTorres9:
You did not get a BX M&A (NYC) offer with that profile. Maybe you got a first round with heavy networking, but doubt you got past it with your resume. Calling BS.

BX M&A is almost entirely Harvard / Wharton, with like 1 kid from UVA, 1 from Illinois, and a few from other ivies. All of them know their shit incredibly well, and have sky high GPAs (none that i know of with sub 3.7. most are 3.8+.). And many of them had bulge bracket ibd sophomore internships.

Maybe i'm misreading your definition of "top notch," but nothing else on that list is "top notch" - except for 2 groups at GS and 1 at MS. And no group-specific offers have gone out yet from those places yet as far as i'm aware.

I mean I don't think someones going to spend the time to write a long ass post just to make stuff up. There's always exceptions to the perceived "necessary" GPA/BB Experience

"Money is a scoreboard where you can rank how you're doing against other people." -Mark Cuban
 
FernandoTorres9:
You did not get a BX M&A (NYC) offer with that profile. Maybe you got a first round with heavy networking, but doubt you got past it with your resume. Calling BS.

BX M&A is almost entirely Harvard / Wharton, with like 1 kid from UVA, 1 from Illinois, and a few from other ivies. All of them know their shit incredibly well, and have sky high GPAs (none that i know of with sub 3.7. most are 3.8+.). And many of them had bulge bracket ibd sophomore internships.

Maybe i'm misreading your definition of "top notch," but nothing else on that list is "top notch" - except for 2 groups at GS and 1 at MS. And no group-specific offers have gone out yet from those places yet as far as i'm aware.

 
Black Jack:
FernandoTorres9:
You did not get a BX M&A (NYC) offer with that profile. Maybe you got a first round with heavy networking, but doubt you got past it with your resume. Calling BS.

BX M&A is almost entirely Harvard / Wharton, with like 1 kid from UVA, 1 from Illinois, and a few from other ivies. All of them know their shit incredibly well, and have sky high GPAs (none that i know of with sub 3.7. most are 3.8+.). And many of them had bulge bracket ibd sophomore internships.

Maybe i'm misreading your definition of "top notch," but nothing else on that list is "top notch" - except for 2 groups at GS and 1 at MS. And no group-specific offers have gone out yet from those places yet as far as i'm aware.

Well aren't you a little prick. I'm going to address this as a real post, though honestly would not be surprised if you are a troll.

If you think that the only firms on the list that are 'top notch" are 1 group at MS and 2 at GS you really are out of your mind- MS, GS SF, GS NY, (I'll leave off GS Chicago since I'm sure that wouldn't quite cut it for you), BX, JPM, Centerview, and Greenhill are absolutely elite firms that 100% of the people on this site would be happy to get an offer with- many of the others are great firms as well.

Just because "the people you know at Blackstone had above 3.7s and all worked at BBs during their sophomore year" does not mean that is always the case. I'll expose myself a bit more and say that BX was one of the firms I attended a super day with (I have since withdrawn my application before hearing back from them). You act as though you are a master on this stuff and know every single analyst at BX, where they came from, what GPA they had, and where they previously interned- I can tell you for a fact that you are wrong. Get your head out of your ass.

i'm not trying to be a dick here, i'm genuinely curious (and was a little surprised you replied to the above post the way you did). i'm just wondering how as a non-target, meaning i'm assuming that the vast majority of your first round interviews were not held on campus, you were able to even attend 21 first rounds when most banks recruit at the same time.

 
hot1590:
of people you networked with, what percentage of them were alumni? Would you say they were the ones who pushed you the most?

I would say 60% or so were alumni- on average they pushed the most, though there were definite exceptions. There were some who didn't push much at all/didn't respond to emails or anything like that. On the other hand there were other people I reached out to (who had similar backgrounds) who responded and helped me out a ton. The alumni connections are definitely the easiest and most obvious, but there are definite exceptions to that.

 

Blackjack, what did you do exactly for your sophomore year? And idk why, but for me non-alumni respond more than alumni for networking. The problem I find with networking, is many times I find myself doing a networking call or they respond, but it doesn't convert to an interview. i mean they like me and stuff, and say I'll push you to hr...which gives the next problem:

Even though I have a referral, a lot of HR's act like a cockblock and decide to not include me in the recruiting process, or delay substantially so the referral can't do anything.

 
zeroblued:
Blackjack, what did you do exactly for your sophomore year? And idk why, but for me non-alumni respond more than alumni for networking. The problem I find with networking, is many times I find myself doing a networking call or they respond, but it doesn't convert to an interview. i mean they like me and stuff, and say I'll push you to hr...which gives the next problem:

Even though I have a referral, a lot of HR's act like a cockblock and decide to not include me in the recruiting process, or delay substantially so the referral can't do anything.

Can't offer much advice on your problem other than to follow up with the contacts who gave you the referral so that they are more in tune with your process/can make sure you get an interview.

Want to maintain some level of anonymity, but I spent the sophomore summer at a pretty unheard of place that was small but not tiny but also relevant to the positions I applied for this year (so think an IB, PE, HF) that sort of thing

 

Had a classmate who did an awesome job networking and landed on almost all the on campus interview lists. He was average, not great grades and resume was average as well. When interviews came, everyone obviously asked who else you are talking with. Top BBs felt like he wasn't good enough compared to the other options they had and lower tiers felt like anyone who is talking with GS/MS/JPM won't be coming to RBC/WF, thus no point wasting an offer. Some banks would ask where we rank, and telling CS they are your top choice while you are talking with JPM doesn't really fly. Ended up somewhere after a lot of heart burn.

Just something to keep in mind when considering stretching too thin with interviews across a very wide range, especially if you can't back it up with very stellar background. Keep in mind that first round interview is like

 

[quote=abacab]Had a classmate who did an awesome job networking and landed on almost all the on campus interview lists. He was average, not great grades and resume was average as well. When interviews came, everyone obviously asked who else you are talking with. Top BBs felt like he wasn't good enough compared to the other options they had and lower tiers felt like anyone who is talking with GS/MS/JPM won't be coming to RBC/WF, thus no point wasting an offer. Some banks would ask where we rank, and telling CS they are your top choice while you are talking with JPM doesn't really fly. Ended up somewhere after a lot of heart burn.

Just something to keep in mind when considering stretching too thin with interviews across a very wide range, especially if you can't back it up with very stellar background. Keep in mind that first round interview is like super day because after asking where else I was applying they felt I was not realistically going to work for them if they made me an offer. On the other hand, during my 2nd round interview with Jefferies I was asked where else I was in the process, and when I responded GS, MS (I added a few other lesser firms to neutralize that) I figured there was no way they would let me continue- I was invited 2 days later to their super day. Some places have larger inferiority complexes than others. Wherever you apply make sure to have very clear reasons of why that firm- there are pretty easy reasons to think of for every firm. I was worried about casting too wide of a net, and when I made a post about that on here I was criticized for asking if I should not apply to 'so many places.' In your example though, I don't think a firm like CS feels that much inferior to JP (nor do I think it is that much inferior to JP) where they would not consider you- in my experience naming firms that are slightly better really helps you- when you name places dramatically better (for example talking to Lincoln and saying you have super days with BX, MS, GS) then you start to run into problems.

 
Black Jack:
In your example though, I don't think a firm like CS feels that much inferior to JP (nor do I think it is that much inferior to JP) where they would not consider you- in my experience naming firms that are slightly better really helps you- when you name places dramatically better (for example talking to Lincoln and saying you have super days with BX, MS, GS) then you start to run into problems.
It's not like a huge inferiority complex, but CS knows that someone with a JP offer won't be coming there. And in most cases, they are going for yield and would rather go for a sure thing. Nothing worse than extending an offer than getting hung out to dry for 3 weeks while someone else you could pick up went somewhere else. Big names do help, just don't get too many if you think you are not going to get any. It also becomes difficult for the candidate. If CS asks you would you take the offer, you will hesitate to commit because you still have GS/MS left, and lose the more sure thing waiting out for the dream job. It's a pretty funny game.
 
A2Allegiance:
OP can you talk a little bit about how to handle multiple offers, and asking for a deadline without sounding like a dick or unenthused?

I didn't run into this problem this year, so I can't offer any first hand advice. Last year I had a few offers that I was weighing, but fortunately none wanted quick turn around in terms of signing/committing. If you do need extra time I would just say you need more time to think about it/talk to parents about your options/something like that. Most places are willing to give you an extension- I would also ask for it a day or few days before the offer expires and not a few hours. It might also help to reach out to your contacts at the firm (assuming you have some) and tell them you need an extension- excited about the opportunity but just have a lot to figure out etc. It is inevitably an awkward topic, but be polite about it and for the most part people will be receptive.

 

Have to agree with prep school networks. My prep school network is better than my non-target university's network. It helped me way more during networking senior year.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 

Congrats BlackJack. This post really does make me feel depressed though haha.

Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts), but where/how did you apply to all of the firms which you received superdays for? OCR?

I feel that I have the adequate skills, maybe marginally lesser stats than you appear to have and a decently good story; but have never been able to share it as I'm on 0 interviews so far. I feel that the bane of my employability is my school quite honestly and feel that it has really killed my chances (despite being near NYC).

Thanks for any advice and don't mind my bitchy self pity.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 
streetwannabe:
Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts)
I have great news for you. I know you probably won't read this, but I think I may have found the source of your problem.
 
SirTradesaLot:
streetwannabe:
Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts)
I have great news for you. I think I may have found the source of your problem.

Some serious inductive reasoning gone awry. I am too lazy (maybe I should've said tired; had classes and work today and prepped for calc quiz) to read the above 40 posts, so that is why I don't have any interviews?

I'm sorry, but that was a very arrogant thing to say. Maybe I don't deserve any interviews, but laziness is fortunately not one of them.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 
streetwannabe:
SirTradesaLot:
streetwannabe:
Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts)
I have great news for you. I think I may have found the source of your problem.

Some serious inductive reasoning gone awry. I am too lazy (maybe I should've said tired; had classes and work today and prepped for calc quiz) to read the above 40 posts, so that is why I don't have any interviews?

I'm sorry, but that was a very arrogant thing to say. Maybe I don't deserve any interviews, but laziness is fortunately not one of them.

I think your signature is actually pretty relevant. If you can't take the time to scan through these posts for some basic research on getting a job, it's likely that you have similar habits in other areas. That's not attractive to employers.

You can say I'm arrogant and that's fine (it's actually true). But guess what? So are most of the people you interview with.

Just something to keep in mind, it's your career, not mine. If you can make some changes to your diligence levels, maybe that would help.

Or, maybe I'm way off base. I have no way if knowing for sure.

 
Best Response
SirTradesaLot:
streetwannabe:
SirTradesaLot:
streetwannabe:
Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts)
I have great news for you. I think I may have found the source of your problem.

Some serious inductive reasoning gone awry. I am too lazy (maybe I should've said tired; had classes and work today and prepped for calc quiz) to read the above 40 posts, so that is why I don't have any interviews?

I'm sorry, but that was a very arrogant thing to say. Maybe I don't deserve any interviews, but laziness is fortunately not one of them.

I think your signature is actually pretty relevant. If you can't take the time to scan through these posts for some basic research on getting a job, it's likely that you have similar habits in other areas. That's not attractive to employers.

You can say I'm arrogant and that's fine (it's actually true). But guess what? So are most of the people you interview with.

Just something to keep in mind, it's your career, not mine. If you can make some changes to your diligence levels, maybe that would help.

Or, maybe I'm way off base. I have no way if knowing for sure.

Haha, I truly appreciate that last sentence because of how true it is. I'm set on making a record on number of cold emails (since recruiting at my school is arguably one of the worst in the country I'd wager); I'm in college, take a full course load and work at a gym most days at 6am. Not going to give you my life story, but I just get pretty fucking annoyed when people have the nerve to call me lazy when I have never been handed anything in my entire life and seemingly get the short end of the stick for reasons unapparent to me.

Internet can be a cruel device for distorting perceptions and I'm usually not bothered by it, except for this.

Best regards

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 
streetwannabe:
Congrats BlackJack. This post really does make me feel depressed though haha.

Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts), but where/how did you apply to all of the firms which you received superdays for? OCR?

I feel that I have the adequate skills, maybe marginally lesser stats than you appear to have and a decently good story; but have never been able to share it as I'm on 0 interviews so far. I feel that the bane of my employability is my school quite honestly and feel that it has really killed my chances (despite being near NYC).

Thanks for any advice and don't mind my bitchy self pity.

OCR I think I received 2 super days from. Hardly any firms recruit on my campus. I listed the ways I landed interviews earlier, but it was mainly reaching out to alumni, random contacts through Linkedin/HR, people from similar schools/backgrounds. From them being referred to HR, landing a first round interview, nailing the interview, and being invited for a super day (or in the case of a few places having multiple phone interviews before super day). It takes persistence and some creativity to find some solid contact at every firm and an "in" at every firm.

 
Black Jack:
streetwannabe:
Congrats BlackJack. This post really does make me feel depressed though haha.

Not sure if it was already asked (too lazy to read all above posts), but where/how did you apply to all of the firms which you received superdays for? OCR?

I feel that I have the adequate skills, maybe marginally lesser stats than you appear to have and a decently good story; but have never been able to share it as I'm on 0 interviews so far. I feel that the bane of my employability is my school quite honestly and feel that it has really killed my chances (despite being near NYC).

Thanks for any advice and don't mind my bitchy self pity.

OCR I think I received 2 super days from. Hardly any firms recruit on my campus. I listed the ways I landed interviews earlier, but it was mainly reaching out to alumni, random contacts through Linkedin/HR, people from similar schools/backgrounds. From them being referred to HR, landing a first round interview, nailing the interview, and being invited for a super day (or in the case of a few places having multiple phone interviews before super day). It takes persistence and some creativity to find some solid contact at every firm and an "in" at every firm.

Thank you OP, enjoy the humanity of a candid response disregarding my admission of being lazy on this site full of hyper sensitive advocates of trying to demoralize the losers such as I. Good luck with everything.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

No problem. One more thing to add. I would look at every firm you are applying to and be able to tell yourself- "I have done everything possible to put myself in the best position possible to get an interview here." Many will work out and others will surprise you and not work out, but I think doing this let me feel at least pretty settled. Whether this meant reaching out to random people etc etc- usually once I had received a direct email from the head of HR (after being referred/having resume forwarded) I knew I was in a good spot. Most times I would even set up a call with them to really nail things down.

 

Great post blackjack, wondering if you could post one of your cold emails. I think I've already got it down and have had 70% response rate, but I'm always curious to see what others are doing.

 
Craftphoto:
Great post blackjack, wondering if you could post one of your cold emails. I think I've already got it down and have had 70% response rate, but I'm always curious to see what others are doing.

Sure thing. 70% sounds very high, so you must be doing something right. I would say I was closer to the 50% mark and even maybe slightly below that. Tough to show a standard cold email template because they differed depending on why I chose to email the person- alum/similar background/etc. but here is the basic idea.

Dear XXXX (If someone graduated in the past 3-4 years I'll call them by first name)

My name is XXXX and I am a junior at XXXX studying XXXXX. I'm very interested in the summer analyst opportunity with XXXX firm and have recently applied for the position (these were later stage cold emails). I was hoping it would be possible to speak with you to learn about your experience at the firm and get your advice on pursuing internship opportunities in investment banking. I've attached my resume for your information. Thank you for your help, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Something along those lines. Simple, message across, they can respond if they want to.

 
zeroblued:
Still wondering how you get such a high response rate, mines in the 15-20%

I think I'm fairly lucky in that I went to a small school so the alumni community is fairly tightknit in that they are willing to help one another out. I should mention, this is for consulting, not IB. But as I start branching out to a wider community, I thought it would be worth it to take another look at my cold email format.

Thanks Blackjack for your format

 

Nemo soluta qui soluta aliquid nemo blanditiis. Quasi ipsam et et voluptatem distinctio officia. Repellendus dolorum tempora cum molestias. Corrupti consequuntur cupiditate ex nihil et vero reiciendis.

 

Maxime id recusandae cum natus sed quasi. Sunt voluptas expedita nemo quia at quo. Nesciunt quisquam dolor consequatur ducimus non ex.

Impedit enim asperiores enim in. Sit reprehenderit qui deleniti ut nam rem. Quo voluptate enim natus voluptatem. Molestias qui aut similique nobis nesciunt. Quod rerum temporibus est nihil repudiandae quas. Soluta ipsa provident necessitatibus neque quisquam aut temporibus.

Ea quo odio ad et quia rerum. Id fuga quisquam accusamus praesentium veniam natus qui. Atque quasi facilis accusantium autem aperiam sapiente aut. Non ipsa delectus tenetur omnis. Voluptatum repudiandae quasi eos porro doloribus nihil adipisci.

Necessitatibus quia rerum quos ut nisi harum sunt. Qui enim natus quia iste omnis rerum. Vero minus incidunt est asperiores.

 

Animi dicta delectus qui est voluptas omnis. Debitis ducimus est molestiae ipsum eum quis ut maiores. Vitae quidem laudantium soluta sed expedita.

Eos expedita ducimus consequuntur pariatur ut culpa architecto. Omnis voluptas nesciunt labore aperiam vitae praesentium inventore. Dolores quaerat ullam incidunt impedit.

Voluptatem occaecati omnis dolores qui adipisci. Et placeat totam earum repellendus accusamus. Fugit consequuntur quo earum rerum.

Sit alias voluptatibus et voluptas eum quo minus consequatur. Quisquam maiores incidunt dolore atque. Velit aut consequatur ex ea voluptate. Commodi delectus unde esse aut harum nihil. Est illum molestias minus rem sed. Tenetur adipisci itaque fugit officia repellat sunt sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”