CFA Professional Conduct Question - fired for "cause"

I’m finishing the CFA Institute Professional Conduct Statement as part of my membership application and wanted to sanity-check an edge case with the community.

In the last two years, I was terminated from an employer following performance issues. The employer explicitly stated there was no violation of policy or rules, and no allegation of fraud, dishonesty, or unethical conduct. There was no HR or compliance investigation, no regulator involvement, and no formal written client complaint provided to me.

Separately, a state unemployment benefits determination applied a statutory definition of “misconduct” (based on alleged failure to follow remedial instructions), resulting in a denial of benefits. This was an administrative benefits decision only — no findings of fraud, ethical violations, or professional misconduct in the CFA sense.

I’m trying to determine whether this fact pattern would require answering “Yes” to any PCS questions (particularly termination for cause or written complaints), or whether “No” responses are appropriate given that this appears to be a performance-based employment dispute rather than a professional conduct issue.

I’ve reviewed the PCS FAQ, Code & Standards (esp. I(D) and I(E)), and disciplinary precedents, — but I’m curious how others have seen similar situations handled in practice.

For anyone who’s dealt with PCS disclosures or has insight into how CFAI draws the line between employment disputes and professional conduct issues, I’d appreciate your perspective.

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content and CFA Institute guidelines, your situation seems to fall into a gray area, but here's how you might approach it:

  1. CFA Professional Conduct Standards: The CFA Institute's Professional Conduct Statement (PCS) focuses on ethical violations, fraud, dishonesty, or professional misconduct. Since your termination was explicitly stated to be due to performance issues and not related to any policy violations, fraud, or unethical behavior, it does not appear to meet the threshold for disclosure under the PCS.

  2. Termination for Cause: While the term "cause" can be broad, the CFA Institute is primarily concerned with causes tied to ethical or professional misconduct. Your case, as described, seems to be a performance-based employment dispute rather than a professional conduct issue. The lack of HR or compliance investigations, regulator involvement, or client complaints further supports this interpretation.

  3. Unemployment Benefits Denial: The denial of unemployment benefits due to "misconduct" under a statutory definition does not necessarily equate to professional misconduct in the CFA sense. Administrative decisions like these are often based on employment law and may not align with the ethical standards of the CFA Institute.

  4. Disclosure Approach: If you are confident that there were no ethical violations, fraud, or dishonesty involved, a "No" response to the PCS questions seems appropriate. However, if there is any ambiguity or concern, you could consider proactively disclosing the situation with a clear explanation that it was a performance-based termination unrelated to professional conduct. Transparency can sometimes be the best approach to avoid future issues.

  5. Practical Insight: From previous WSO threads, members have emphasized that the CFA Institute values honesty and integrity. If you choose to disclose, frame it factually and emphasize the absence of ethical or professional misconduct. This can demonstrate your commitment to the CFA Code of Ethics.

Ultimately, if you're uncertain, consulting with a legal or compliance professional familiar with CFA standards could provide additional clarity.

Sources: Give me your phone or your fired, Fired for the first time, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/job-search/suing-a-former-employer?customgpt=1, Caught interviewing and asked to leave, Quitting due to health reasons

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Perspiciatis quod rerum qui. Numquam qui iure vero et ipsum et sit corrupti.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”