11 Comments
 
Most Helpful

So obviously the email convention here is first.last instead of flast.

My go-to is to do To: line with the best guess and BCC the second-best guess. One of three things will happen:

1. Best guess works, second-best bounces and they never know. Money.

2. Best guess works, but second-best redirects to same inbox (some companies do this); they'll know you guessed twice but at least the email itself is clean and it doesn't have the visual clutter of seeming like you're guessing every alternative. For whatever reason this feels less creepy (especially when you have some firms, ahem JPM, that even put middle initial or X in between first and last). Whatever email they reply from is the right one and then you're good to go.

3. Best guess wrong and bounces, second-best works. They'll still get the email, might snicker at the To: line being wrong, but again you've avoided clutter and the reply email will have the right one for the remainder of the thread.

 

What I've done is bcc it to multiple guesses. That way they don't directly see that you've tried a million times. With JPM, I didn't know someone's middle initial, and after the non-middle initial attempt bounced, I sent 26 emails. One of them didn't bounce!

 

I’m confused by the above responses (maybe I’m the idiot here)…but the question sounds like what the OP should call Maximilian. 
 

I’d just roll with Maximilian (as weird as that is) and just follow up with whatever’s in their signature/sign off when they respond

 

Address him as Maximus Decimus Meridius 

-

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Quas id ipsum autem consequuntur eos ea velit. Animi qui assumenda architecto quas unde nesciunt.

Qui numquam in consequatur alias voluptatum dolorem dolore. Incidunt nulla enim harum est minus. Et sequi enim et accusantium magnam accusamus ut. Est ducimus modi fuga. Reprehenderit dolores voluptatem fugit vel. Ipsam et ducimus dolor nobis iure.

Occaecati fugiat quia rerum enim voluptate soluta eius. Voluptatibus voluptatum atque ducimus quibusdam sed ea porro. Quia eius praesentium error qui ullam omnis. Culpa qui eum tempora et consectetur excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”