HH or in house recruiter?
Which is better in terms of negotiating comp? I've gotten reachouts from mostly headhunters but some in house PE recruiters on linkedin or even Head of HR / Recruiting folks at smaller shops have also reached out directly.
My understanding is HHs will try to increase your comp so they can get higher commission but might also try to convince you to take below market comp (as long as you are fine with it or unaware) so you're the "cheapest" candidate and can get the offer easier. That way they still get paid commission vs nothing at all.
Like if the total package was 400k * illustrative 25% commission, then 40k comp difference = $10k missing from $100k vs $0. However, in house recruiters don't need to spend money on a HH and know more about internal pay bands but they're working directly for the employer so no incentive to increase your comp. Thoughts?
When it comes to negotiating compensation, both headhunters (HHs) and in-house recruiters have their pros and cons, depending on the situation:
Headhunters (HHs):
In-House Recruiters:
Key Takeaways:
Ultimately, the best approach is to leverage the strengths of both. Use HHs for market insights and to explore multiple opportunities, but when dealing with in-house recruiters, be prepared to advocate for yourself and negotiate based on your research.
Sources: Networking into a Hedge Fund? It's Unstructured., Do you talk numbers with headhunters?, What do you say when recruiters ask "What is your current comp?", Are you interviewing with any other banks/firms?, Q&A: Headhunter/Recruiter - M&A Investment Banking
Incidunt velit labore voluptatibus eligendi perspiciatis. Beatae excepturi eligendi rem accusamus consequuntur laudantium. Id labore beatae incidunt libero. Dignissimos repellat sed doloribus commodi dolores rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...