Is Finance Considered Quant or Just Soft For Trading/Hedge Funds?

Hi,

I was wondering if, for the trading and hedge fund industry, finance is considered a legitimate major in that it builds some quant skills or if its just considered to be a bullshit/soft major? Does anyone know people without crazy quant abilities (i.e. just finance majors that take the regular finance math classes) that still get into this industry, because it seems to be moving more toward those who are mathematics geniuses as opposed to those who understand finance really well.

Also, in general, what makes a major "quant"? For example, there's a ton of stat in finance, but finance may be considered "soft" while stat is considered quantitative. The thing that I don't understand is that, while stats in more in depth into the statistics, whenever I do stat classes, half of the class feels like its just about knowing how to input stuff into your calculator, and had very little to do with improving problem-solving skills. Sure, it helped me analyze data better, but other than that, I didn't really think it was that quantitative. That's why I'm trying to figure out what constitutes "quant"? Is it limited to just engineering/math or can things like finance that deal extensively with numbers and analyzing data also be lumped into this?

10 Comments
 

From my experience as a Finance undergraduate, I feel my professors with purely finance backgrounds simply lecture on the plug and chug calculations for statistics. This semester, I have a Finance professor who is a math PhD and has us deriving every single common finance and statistics formula/proof/principle. I feel this experience is more "quanty". Generally, I would assume that more "target" your school is, the more quanty a regular finance degree will be. I come from a non-target whilst this professor came from a target and is shocking us with his thoroughness.

 

For the vast majority, i don't think that a Finance major is very quantitative. Did you have to take a calc sequence (Calc 1-3)? Differential Equations? Linear Algebra? Set Theory? Econometrics? Advanced Statistics? If not, then definitely not quantitative.

In any case, you can put these courses in you relevant coursework section (if you have one) to show that you have developed some quantitative skills.

 
The Sour Patch Kid calc sequence (Calc 1-3)? Differential Equations? Linear Algebra? Set Theory? Econometrics? Advanced Statistics? .

Are you calling those advanced math classes? If you are, I disagree. I wouldn't consider those course quantitative or advanced math, those are all the basic math classes everyone should take.

"The way to make money is to buy when blood is running in the streets." -John D. Rockefeller
 
Best Response
carlfox
The Sour Patch Kid calc sequence (Calc 1-3)? Differential Equations? Linear Algebra? Set Theory? Econometrics? Advanced Statistics? .

Are you calling those advanced math classes? If you are, I disagree. I wouldn't consider those course quantitative or advanced math, those are all the basic math classes everyone should take.

I wholeheartedly agree. Those aren't very advanced classes, but they are levels of math higher than those required in a vast majority of UG finance programs. That was all just to say that, because classes of even that level are generally not required to graduate in finance, it is unlikely for anyone judging you just based on your major to believe that a Finance major is very quantitatively challenging.

 

The only majors I would consider quantitative are engineering, math, physics, statistics, and probably computer science too (though computer science is quantitative in a different regard).

I disagree with the above statement about those courses are "basic math". For the vast majority of majors, with the exception of those listed above, those courses constitute math classes beyond the required level. So by mere definition they really aren't basic math. Even still, even marginally quantitative majors such as chemistry don't require any math beyond multivariable calculus so taking differential equations/linear algebra/etc. is, at least in my opinion, advanced math.

 
CheespuffsI disagree with the above statement about those courses are "basic math". For the vast majority of majors, with the exception of those listed above, those courses constitute math classes beyond the required level. So by mere definition they really aren't basic math. Even still, even marginally quantitative majors such as chemistry don't require any math beyond multivariable calculus so taking differential equations/linear algebra/etc. is, at least in my opinion, advanced math.
Disagree. Just because it's not commonly used in specific majors doesn't make it basic? When will an economics major use Organic Chemistry, which you could argue is beyond the required level of an "Intro to Chemistry"-type science class? Probably never. Does that make orgo an "advanced chemistry" class? No; it's a basic chemistry class.

The bottom tier of "basic" math classes constitutes calc (up to multivar), diffEQ, and linalg. Some may even throw in real analysis. For anyone who wants to get into a remotely quant area, those are the bare minimum you need.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

Rerum magnam ipsum ut sit ut. Ipsa nam repudiandae adipisci aliquid explicabo. Cupiditate occaecati doloremque harum nemo voluptas tempore. Velit qui corrupti dolorem autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”