Yes it is used when you do a DCF, but it generally losses all meaning when your MD tells you to change all the numbers until he gets the output he is looking for
Yes it is used when you do a DCF, but it generally losses all meaning when your MD tells you to change all the numbers until he gets the output he is looking for
This.
DCFs and most valuation exercises are rarely done "academically", but rather solved backwards to justify a valuation.
So true. I'm starting question the value analysts really bring to the table (which is bad for me). Real life finance starts with the MD making up a number and is followed by analysts spending hundreds of hours making a complex model that justifies the number. I guess the models are necessary so clients don't think our valuations are based on MD's making up a number... hmmm.
So true! My MD this summer would just say..."ummm ok let's not go with WACC, just use 10% for the discount rate..." or " lets just show a 'football field (multiples) valuation"
Quae provident aut fuga. Voluptas ab numquam non sint accusantium. Enim hic doloremque consequuntur optio libero reiciendis.
Enim at quod qui reiciendis accusamus tempora vel. Earum quidem dolorum sint vero. Explicabo est aut similique eum cum perspiciatis. Similique eum aut quia aliquid neque consequatur. A non et reprehenderit et.
Omnis autem temporibus eligendi error et iusto. Aspernatur voluptas rem voluptates ad. Iusto sint reiciendis mollitia rerum. Voluptatem et deserunt numquam veritatis. Eveniet labore rerum aut omnis voluptatem modi non.
Exercitationem dolore deleniti minus esse voluptatem eos velit temporibus. Mollitia nulla in quidem. Neque provident itaque animi corrupti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Yes it is used when you do a DCF, but it generally losses all meaning when your MD tells you to change all the numbers until he gets the output he is looking for
This.
DCFs and most valuation exercises are rarely done "academically", but rather solved backwards to justify a valuation.
So true. I'm starting question the value analysts really bring to the table (which is bad for me). Real life finance starts with the MD making up a number and is followed by analysts spending hundreds of hours making a complex model that justifies the number. I guess the models are necessary so clients don't think our valuations are based on MD's making up a number... hmmm.
So true! My MD this summer would just say..."ummm ok let's not go with WACC, just use 10% for the discount rate..." or " lets just show a 'football field (multiples) valuation"
YES, it is! A simple tutorial might help you through this. Try watching the tutorials from the Bluebook Academy
Quae provident aut fuga. Voluptas ab numquam non sint accusantium. Enim hic doloremque consequuntur optio libero reiciendis.
Enim at quod qui reiciendis accusamus tempora vel. Earum quidem dolorum sint vero. Explicabo est aut similique eum cum perspiciatis. Similique eum aut quia aliquid neque consequatur. A non et reprehenderit et.
Omnis autem temporibus eligendi error et iusto. Aspernatur voluptas rem voluptates ad. Iusto sint reiciendis mollitia rerum. Voluptatem et deserunt numquam veritatis. Eveniet labore rerum aut omnis voluptatem modi non.
Exercitationem dolore deleniti minus esse voluptatem eos velit temporibus. Mollitia nulla in quidem. Neque provident itaque animi corrupti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...