Pacific Rim

It wasn't a great film, and yet, it was fucking awesome.

Following the likes of other films like Peter Jackson's King Kong or Spielberg's War of the Worlds, movies about large creatures inflicting mass destruction are not new. But whereas those other films arguably put more emphasis on various elements of the film, Guillermo Del Toro decided to go all out on the visual component. To be honest, I wish he had cut out like half the fighting scenes and focused more heavily on other aspects of the film that were introduced or investigated on the surface but not explored in depth, including the sci-fi plot threads (I mean, the whole movie could have just been focused around the wormhole or two people merging memories), character development, the relationship between the characters, etc. All of these were incorporated but it just seemed a bit fragmented. It's impossible to deny though that the visuals were mind-blowing.

Thoughts?

7 Comments
 

It was awesome, but I'm biased because I watched Gundam, Big O, Evangelion, etc. when I was younger.

Agreed that they should've expanded a bit more on the sub-plots. I hope they do that in the sequel.

 

You're right.

-plug suits. Check -sync ratios. Check -huge humanoid robots. Check -Angel like interdimensional creatures. Check.

Doesn't sound familiar AT ALL. With that said, I give it 2.5/5 stars. +Visual treat/ - Horrendous plot. It lacks the dynamism of the show it is an homage too.

 

Consequatur ab et quae minus reiciendis delectus ut. Aut laboriosam quasi deserunt dolores. Quia eos deleniti sed temporibus iste quaerat amet nemo. Rem aliquam doloremque esse maxime amet provident.

Suscipit ut voluptatem veniam dolorem. Ipsam harum nihil perferendis reprehenderit. Sunt ut fugit iure eum molestiae. Nesciunt velit ducimus et voluptas ut totam qui. Sunt cum nisi cum repudiandae vitae fugiat. Soluta voluptatem esse mollitia quis omnis ducimus accusamus.

My drinkin' problem left today, she packed up all her bags and walked away.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”