Found a distressed manufacturing business to purchase for around 900K

Hello, 

I found a distressed manufacturing business for sale for 900K (I am sure they will negotiate). It has around 3m revenue for the past 3 years. It makes heavy hydraulic machinery for steel and mining plants. 

The profit margins on each sale is large because it is custom. This can't be done overseas because each piece can weigh over a ton. Also, their is not much competition because the cost to simply set it up is prohibitive. 

Here is the issue: It has very little net income. Their is no automation (no robots). Production of this machinery depends heavily on grinding and welding--which can be done by the newest AI-based robot systems (because they don't require programming). Machine tending can also be automated. 

Automation can be done by paying per month (robot as a service). 

I am thinking of setting up an LLC and purchasing this business. The owner is willing to finance. Would this be a good start? I know this is too small for PE but I wonder what people think?

Thank you so much!

EDIT

I spoke to a large manufacturer about this and he agreed with everyone here: It is hopeless. It cannot be turned around. thank you everyone so much!

20 Comments
 

Associate 2 in PE - LBOs

Headline: “Aspiring Young ETA Executive Finds Business with Ample Growth Opportunities. One Problem: It Doesn’t Make Money…”

But that is the opportunity. If it made money, their would not be an opportunity. 

 

More a response to your prior post that I couldn’t comment on:

We do this - it makes sense but it’ll be impossible to raise a fund around without a track record. LLC might be the right path.

You will need enough technical and operational savvy in your team to convince others than this is something that can be implemented easily with much risk, and definitely don’t just assume some random robotics-aas company will do it well. If they do they’ll try to extract much of the efficiency gains from you. Sounds like you’re early on that but nothing that hunger and drive can’t work out. I would map out the key production processes and costs, and clearly articulate which could benefit from automation and show how it transforms the bottom line.

We’ve been building out a similar strategy in a much bigger vertical (think data centers) but been hard to find the right people to execute

$1mm is way too small for our fund but could do some PA if you pull the pieces together. Bigger issue is whether TAM is eventually big enough. Grinding and welding stuff is a big space but if it’s highly customized for some specialty niche product line that is very localized it might not be interesting enough

Another idea maybe easier for you is probably using AI tools not robotics in automation for services companies.

 

WSRaider

More a response to your prior post that I couldn’t comment on:

We do this - it makes sense but it’ll be impossible to raise a fund around without a track record. LLC might be the right path.

You will need enough technical and operational savvy in your team to convince others than this is something that can be implemented easily with much risk, and definitely don’t just assume some random robotics-aas company will do it well. If they do they’ll try to extract much of the efficiency gains from you. Sounds like you’re early on that but nothing that hunger and drive can’t work out. I would map out the key production processes and costs, and clearly articulate which could benefit from automation and show how it transforms the bottom line.

We’ve been building out a similar strategy in a much bigger vertical (think data centers) but been hard to find the right people to execute

$1mm is way too small for our fund but could do some PA if you pull the pieces together. Bigger issue is whether TAM is eventually big enough. Grinding and welding stuff is a big space but if it’s highly customized for some specialty niche product line that is very localized it might not be interesting enough

Another idea maybe easier for you is probably using AI tools not robotics in automation for services companies.

Thank you for your post!

This opportunity is in heavy-industry hydraulic cylinder manufacturing, a sector with a large TAM and significant growth potential, particularly given ongoing demand from drilling, fracking, mining, and steel mills.

I am planning to partner with an established firm. There are multiple firms already in this space, and some international companies are actively looking to enter the U.S. market, which creates additional partnership opportunities.

I also bring experience in robotics integration—including costs, implementation, and programming. In fact, the mark-up that robotic integrators charge is quite reasonable for the value they provide. I already have a clear roadmap for automation: starting with machine tending (which is straightforward to automate), followed by grinding, and eventually welding. Several investor-backed startups in these areas are currently offering below-market solutions, making adoption even more accessible.

If I find the right industry partner, I think I'd do it. The current owner is motivated to sell, is open to financing, and has been running the company without any automation, according to the broker—leaving significant upside potential.

Thank you again! I hope I will find a partner!

 

throwway593

No wonder BMW isn't making money like they used to...they can't ship cars over 2,000 LBS lmao

This is custom machinery. It wouldn't make sense to order just a few custom pieces to be shipped from China, just to save a few thousand dollars at most. It would be difficult to ship a few pieces. 

 
Most Helpful

Think about the type of business that makes a good classic distressed investment: good business with a bad balance sheet.  Now ask yourself why this one only makes "very little net income".  Sounds like the cost structure is one problem, and this can potentially be addressed through automation, but automation is most applicable to high volume low mix manufacturing, not high mix low volume which it sounds like this is closer to if there's a lot of customization.  And why haven't they already pursued automation; that's not novel - automation initiatives are one of those things that sounds great as an IC memo bullet but is hard to do in practice even for a very experienced ops guy.  Your material inputs are also a lot of commodity exposed metal and possible tariff headwinds.  I would also question the assumption that you have a competitive moat because these heavy components can't be shipped; a lot of heavy equipment you see at construction sites, mines, etc. is manufactured overseas (Korea, Japan) where they're buying their hydraulic cylinders locally.  Even if there's demand from US OEMs, the shipping cost alone might not be enough to overcome the lower cost suppliers, especially if there's a lot of labor content in the cost structure (good welders in Malaysia command a premium but they're still well under half what they'd cost here) and especially if your inputs are structurally more expensive due to steel tariffs.  I'm guessing your customers (big equipment OEMs) also have a lot of leverage given their concentration; unless you have a ton of proprietary tech/value-add (unlikely), those types of customers can be a nightmare.  Make sure you're really confident in the growth outlook - I'd be very very surprised if it's much above GDP (if that).  Finally, unless there's a big aftermarket component which it doesn't sound like there is (I could be wrong, never looked at this category before) you have a ton of rates/capex budget exposure which can result in significant demand/earnings swings.  All to say, go in with your eyes wide open - there may be hard-to-fix reasons why the business is distressed.  Don't overpay, go in with a plan and be very careful with leverage.  Good luck.

 

VP in PE - LBOs

Think about the type of business that makes a good classic distressed investment: good business with a bad balance sheet.  Now ask yourself why this one only makes "very little net income".  Sounds like the cost structure is one problem, and this can potentially be addressed through automation, but automation is most applicable to high volume low mix manufacturing, not high mix low volume which it sounds like this is closer to if there's a lot of customization.  And why haven't they already pursued automation; that's not novel - automation initiatives are one of those things that sounds great as an IC memo bullet but is hard to do in practice even for a very experienced ops guy.  Your material inputs are also a lot of commodity exposed metal and possible tariff headwinds.  I would also question the assumption that you have a competitive moat because these heavy components can't be shipped; a lot of heavy equipment you see at construction sites, mines, etc. is manufactured overseas (Korea, Japan) where they're buying their hydraulic cylinders locally.  Even if there's demand from US OEMs, the shipping cost alone might not be enough to overcome the lower cost suppliers, especially if there's a lot of labor content in the cost structure (good welders in Malaysia command a premium but they're still well under half what they'd cost here) and especially if your inputs are structurally more expensive due to steel tariffs.  I'm guessing your customers (big equipment OEMs) also have a lot of leverage given their concentration; unless you have a ton of proprietary tech/value-add (unlikely), those types of customers can be a nightmare.  Make sure you're really confident in the growth outlook - I'd be very very surprised if it's much above GDP (if that).  Finally, unless there's a big aftermarket component which it doesn't sound like there is (I could be wrong, never looked at this category before) you have a ton of rates/capex budget exposure which can result in significant demand/earnings swings.  All to say, go in with your eyes wide open - there may be hard-to-fix reasons why the business is distressed.  Don't overpay, go in with a plan and be very careful with leverage.  Good luck.

Oh thank you so much for this information. Looking at what everyone here has said, it may be a very bad deal. 

I am speaking to a well-reputed manufacturer to see if they want to join on this. If they say no, I'd leave. It means that it is a bad deal. 

I know that their are new AI-based automation robots that are good for high-mix, low volume. Some of these can get brought for below market rates because these companies are investor-funded. However, that may not be enough. 

I will see what the company says. It looks like a bad deal tbh. Thank you all so much!

 

VP in PE - LBOs

Think about the type of business that makes a good classic distressed investment: good business with a bad balance sheet.  Now ask yourself why this one only makes "very little net income".  Sounds like the cost structure is one problem, and this can potentially be addressed through automation, but automation is most applicable to high volume low mix manufacturing, not high mix low volume which it sounds like this is closer to if there's a lot of customization.  And why haven't they already pursued automation; that's not novel - automation initiatives are one of those things that sounds great as an IC memo bullet but is hard to do in practice even for a very experienced ops guy.  Your material inputs are also a lot of commodity exposed metal and possible tariff headwinds.  I would also question the assumption that you have a competitive moat because these heavy components can't be shipped; a lot of heavy equipment you see at construction sites, mines, etc. is manufactured overseas (Korea, Japan) where they're buying their hydraulic cylinders locally.  Even if there's demand from US OEMs, the shipping cost alone might not be enough to overcome the lower cost suppliers, especially if there's a lot of labor content in the cost structure (good welders in Malaysia command a premium but they're still well under half what they'd cost here) and especially if your inputs are structurally more expensive due to steel tariffs.  I'm guessing your customers (big equipment OEMs) also have a lot of leverage given their concentration; unless you have a ton of proprietary tech/value-add (unlikely), those types of customers can be a nightmare.  Make sure you're really confident in the growth outlook - I'd be very very surprised if it's much above GDP (if that).  Finally, unless there's a big aftermarket component which it doesn't sound like there is (I could be wrong, never looked at this category before) you have a ton of rates/capex budget exposure which can result in significant demand/earnings swings.  All to say, go in with your eyes wide open - there may be hard-to-fix reasons why the business is distressed.  Don't overpay, go in with a plan and be very careful with leverage.  Good luck.

Thank you again. I spoke to a large manufacturer and you are right, it is a bad business to buy. No hope. Thank you!

 

Fuhnance

I wish WSO had more threads like this. Very informative and interesting to read people's perspectives. Thanks for posting OP!

I spoke to a large manufacturer in this area, and the deal is not worth it. Too much risk with competition from Asia!

 

m_1

I do distressed consumer including consumer that owns manufacturing.

Like the poster above said, the problem here is structurally bad unit economics. Personally, I would not want to do it. It's so small that cutting will result in...nothing left! 

So you don't have much "clay" to mold your co with.

Oh thank you. Yes, I spoke with a manufacturer in this area and he said the exact same. 

I have a question. What about a larger well-run service-based manufacturer with very good financials?

I found one such plant, and it has 0 automation. I know that welding, grinding and machine tending can all easily be automated. I know several startups that would work with me for below-market terms because of the massive VC funding they have. 

I am thinking of working to purchase this plant, and improving it via automation. I would also implement new software. I know the cost savings would be solid. Problem is, how do I find people who want to collaborate? Thank you so much!

 

luke8

m_1

I do distressed consumer including consumer that owns manufacturing.

Like the poster above said, the problem here is structurally bad unit economics. Personally, I would not want to do it. It's so small that cutting will result in...nothing left! 

So you don't have much "clay" to mold your co with.

Oh thank you. Yes, I spoke with a manufacturer in this area and he said the exact same. 

I have a question. What about a larger well-run service-based manufacturer with very good financials?

I found one such plant, and it has 0 automation. I know that welding, grinding and machine tending can all easily be automated. I know several startups that would work with me for below-market terms because of the massive VC funding they have. 

I am thinking of working to purchase this plant, and improving it via automation. I would also implement new software. I know the cost savings would be solid. Problem is, how do I find people who want to collaborate? Thank you so much!

Do you have experience with this? Manufacturing automation rarely makes sense unless you REALLY know the process itself makes the most sense for what you make.

I don't think the gains you think exist with software will really be there, and that is a core part of what we do btw. For color re: automation, I have a co that will NET ~$5m - $6m and we change our manufacturing processes + locations so often that I don't see us investing in any automation any time soon...

 

All my experience tells me this: Do not listen to any of us here, since nobody can be smart with this little info to go. 

I would go and find ~2 very senior guys from the space, have them sign an NDA and walk them through the details / get their opinion. This is the stuff that is worth spending a bit of money on. Even if they shit on the opp, you can use their expertise to perhaps find a co that matches the criteria you are after.

 

Harum quisquam facilis dolorem. Aspernatur modi dolorem eos molestiae delectus maiores et. Culpa natus explicabo voluptatem est. Aliquam voluptas provident labore temporibus similique. Quia tenetur voluptatum laudantium sapiente. Ipsa doloremque molestias recusandae deleniti quo quo quia.

Consequuntur et nulla officiis et. Expedita aliquam ut mollitia debitis voluptas at. Exercitationem quas blanditiis veniam ut dolores omnis. Quis id necessitatibus dolores est sed fugit illum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”