PIK interest

Im doing an onboarding case study for a small-midcap US PE shop. One of the Questions is an LBO model, asking to find Exit EV value using trailing FCF of 10%. It does not specify whether to use UFCF or LFCF. 

There is also mezzanine debt with PIK interest.

My question is: 1. Do I use LFCF or UFCF (FCFF) for deriving the exit EV

And if I do use LFCF, do I add back PIK interest to derive FCF, considering it is a non cash expense? 

Hence, for LFCF would this be correct: NI + PIK interest + D&A - Capex - Change NWC

or would I not add back PIK interest? For UFCF this is ofc irrelevant. 

Thanks

5 Comments
 

Would add it back since it's a non cash expense. Also PIK debt will be higher at exit that at entry and therefore affect valuation. If you don't add it back you'll be missing the PIK cashflow while still having a growing debt amount

 

EV is a valuation metric that takes into account value from all stakeholders (equity and debt). Therefore, you need to use UFCF which is a cash flow metric that is available to all stakeholders. You always want an apples to apples comparison, so if you’re looking at the value of the entire firm (EV), you need a cash flow for the whole firm (UFCF). If you were only looking for equity value, then you’d use LFCF.

 

Ad aut et veritatis ut praesentium nulla ut. Ab ab quia vero numquam vitae. Ut velit molestiae maiores animi fuga magni aut.

Earum reiciendis optio voluptatibus sed neque voluptas. Porro porro veritatis omnis ratione pariatur. Harum molestias mollitia mollitia enim exercitationem id ut. Cum impedit rerum ducimus quo explicabo et.

Vel dolores autem porro dolor. Quidem inventore aut impedit nisi modi aut ipsa non. Id temporibus animi aliquid eaque voluptatibus et dignissimos temporibus. Sit occaecati voluptatem unde commodi. Itaque autem quasi eveniet iste enim nobis. Dolorem et est suscipit iure est molestiae illo sunt. Modi sit totam sit praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (274) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”