Search Fund Check In

Anyone go down the search fund route recently? Would love to hear some stories from the ground on how competitive the market is, multiples trending up, economic uncertainty etc. Please also list your geo(s)

Considering going down this path later this year

Fwiw the few folks I know who have gone down this path have all had decent success finding and closing deals (tbd on how those turn out). General consensus is that market is saturated with MBA type buyers but pretty easy to differentiate if you know a thing or two about M&A and aren't a complete idiot. Also a ton of "fake" buyers who are just putting up a website / story while they recruit for buy side jobs

14 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I think search funds are a lot less compelling than they used to be because entry prices are so high now. I think I'd rather put ~$100k into trying 4 business ideas, then use personally guaranteed SBA debt to scale w/e actually works best.

For color, we used to bid a lot against people in that size range, now we are upstream. Part of the problem with search funds is that you're now bidding against some 45 yr old that spent decades in corporate and are hilariously confident in buying at very high multiples because they're using SBA debt. I've seen some insanely stupid transaction happen lol.

If you do go the search fund route, I'd focus on something NOT red hot...IMO it's extremely tough to make money if you overpay for something. 

 

I've been running one for a couple months now. I don't really relate to what you're saying about saturated market... most sellers I'm engaging with aren't familiar with the model and have never spoken to a searcher before. I mostly compete with true strategic buyers and aggregator / holdco types (more the latter), who aren't too tough to pitch against as you're selling a fundamentally different "product." Pricing is tough but it's tough in every segment of private investing. 

I generally agree with your take -- if you put in a little effort and especially if you have a sourcing background, it's not hard to stand out. Business owners are bombarded with more inbounds than ever but so much of it is AI slop that a thoughtful entreaty still gets noticed. 

Edit: to the poster's point above, I would not recommend using an SBA loan or looking at assets of the size you could buy with one. The personal guarantee aspect is super scary, and it only goes up to $5M... at that size range you're basically buying a job versus buying something with true operating infra. The search fund LP world is very welcoming of people with legit finance backgrounds and it's not hard to get a deal with attractive economics with no personal capital at risk. 

 

"Great deal with attractive economics" - aren't traditional search LP terms 1.0x liquidity prefs @ 8% pref interest? On top of that, you still need to negotiate catch up on the pref interest, and ~8% of your 25% carry is only fully vested when >35% IRR... 

In what world are those "attractive" economics? You better pray to god you (i) don't overpay, and (ii) buy something with astronomic growth potential, if you want to see any real dollars that would compare to your outcome of simply sticking around in PE.

On second thought, maybe I should just become a search LP!    

 

I saw it as more appealing than carry but you may be more bullish on institutional PE than I am. You have more control over the success or failure of the situation and the asset class in general is better performing (aggregate search returns in the last decade are >40% IRR, even taking out the Top 5 highest performers). Top quintile of equity proceeds for search entrepreneurs is >$10M, but there was exactly a 0.00% chance I would achieve that in 6 more years of PE as a midlevel guy. 

If you're happy as a cog, you won't be happy searching and vice versa. They're fundamentally different paths based on how risk-on you are. 

(source for all the above is the 2024 Stanford search study, for the curious)

 

Why do ETA if they have an IB/PE background? Your opportunity cost is so high. Might as well go bigger and do an independent sponsor model. Am I missing something here? I plan on going from IB/PE to an investor role and not an operator role/job. 

 

Bought a building materials company 2 years ago.. 2m EBITDA. The search fund model is a waste of time IMO. You are better off operating as an independent sponsor. Do some deals as a minority partner (but NOT the operator) and get some ‘track record’ under your belt.

I am actively trying to source a big proprietary deal (ideally >5m ebita) and I will hustle to capitalize / operate it. Don’t waste your time operating something sub 1m

 

It's funny I said the same thing and got monkey poo for it. My thoughts are: why would someone leave an IB/PE (presuming Sr. Assc level) role where you're getting paid ~$400k total comp (that's increasing per yr) with no risk beyond showing up to lever up and personally guarantee an SBA loan to buy a small business? 

Even if earnings meet the Search Fund sweet spot of ~$750k, that's 2x the earnings of your less risky career yet potentially hundreds of thousands/millions at risk should the business go bad. Say you do a Search Fund, and you make $3m after 5yrs. In IB/PE you likely would've made ~$2.3m at little to no risk. So ~$700k more for a larger downside?

I like the independent sponsor approach where you're an investor with a management team in place. IB/PE skills directly more applicable, and you can build a portfolio over time all while possibly working remote. Same amount of time, larger deals, management team, and larger upside?

 

Rem qui vel voluptatem et. In fugit id reprehenderit cum. Tenetur asperiores assumenda velit fuga sapiente blanditiis. Sit amet similique qui. Non itaque iste nisi impedit tempora voluptate.

Reprehenderit aut quis iste libero. Aut et sed alias quisquam est qui. Sit hic in voluptas unde ut. Voluptatem at error distinctio rerum facere.

Et voluptas dolorem enim deserunt. Sunt soluta quia possimus voluptas veritatis. Illum nobis id modi eius suscipit et consequuntur.

Accusamus sed quo distinctio expedita veniam molestias libero non. Beatae reprehenderit et omnis ullam beatae harum id dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”