15 Comments
 

Based on previous WSO threads, real estate debt models at large institutions like banks can be quite complex. They typically include:

  • Detailed Cash Flow Analysis: This involves projecting the cash flows from the property, including rental income, operating expenses, and capital expenditures.
  • Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR): Calculating the DSCR to ensure the property generates enough income to cover debt payments.
  • Loan-to-Value (LTV) Ratio: Assessing the LTV ratio to determine the loan amount relative to the property's value.
  • Sensitivity Analysis: Running various scenarios to see how changes in key assumptions (e.g., interest rates, occupancy rates) impact the model.
  • Market Research and Comparables (Comps): Incorporating market data and comparable property analysis to validate assumptions and projections.
  • Argus Integration: For some models, integrating outputs from Argus software, which is commonly used for detailed property-level analysis.

For specific examples, you might find useful insights in the following threads: - Real Estate Debt Modelling: Discusses expectations for debt modeling tests and whether they focus on debt or equity. - Debt Fund Modeling / Argus: Explores the level of detail in underwriting and modeling at a mortgage REIT, including the use of Argus and adjustments to broker/sponsor assumptions. - Debt Fund Modeling in REPE?: Seeks templates and examples for LP-GP waterfall models in the context of commercial loans.

If you need actual case studies or templates, some users on WSO have accumulated these over the years and might be open to sharing or swapping them. You can find more details in the thread titled Real Estate Modeling Test Examples.

Sources: Real Estate Debt Modelling, Run Me Through This Real Estate Model, Real Estate Modeling Test Examples, Debt Fund Modeling in REPE?, Debt Fund Modeling / Argus

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

If you're talking big banks, the underwriting and models are going to be very simple. Think "in place" NOI. They may run a few scenarios such as, what is the NOI if X tenant doesn't renew? 

But from my experience the banks don't run 10 year cash flows, don't run IRR, and don't run equity multiples etc. 

Construction lending will be a bit more intense in the modelling as you will have to calculate interest reserve so have to do a monthly cash flow probably.

But overall, lending underwrting is way more simple than equity underwriting.

PropMetrica | Multifamily underwriting template
 

Somewhat true, the best debt funds/lenders will run pretty in depth analysis on these deals. A lot of people have problem loans and don't want to make the same mistake twice. I have seen debt models be just as detailed and even more detailed than some equity ones. Given this is on your class "A" institutional product.

 

I am not surprised, I think it really varies a lot between lenders and types of lenders. Your comment is interesting as haven't worked on the lender side in like 6 years.

PropMetrica | Multifamily underwriting template
 

Disagree with this propmetrica.com, unless we are strictly talking about bank lending. Currently working for a platform that started as an LP/co-GP equity shop, and has since opened a debt fund. Having worked on both sides of the biz, debt gets as complicated as equity (if not more-so) when you start adding in levers like PIK options, participating structures, etc.

 

He literally said "If you're talking big banks"..., which is true, a big bank is not focused on a detailed underwrite of the 5-year (or whatever the loan term is) cash flows for an asset. They'll primarily focus on the stabilized untrended base case, the debt yield, DSCR, the loan basis, and the downside case. A bank doesn't underwrite the scenario of operating an asset. 

 

Facilis ullam repudiandae ut ipsa rerum reprehenderit quisquam. Deleniti omnis modi ex sapiente ducimus eos. Recusandae asperiores omnis error error aut numquam illo. Est blanditiis id voluptatem doloremque voluptate est.

Aut nulla quod quidem quis. Ducimus explicabo quasi unde sed officiis quia.

Quod deserunt praesentium molestiae sunt ea maiores et. Neque atque similique adipisci animi. Temporibus vel eos sit esse saepe necessitatibus recusandae aut. Accusantium unde id voluptate cum eos qui provident.

Aperiam delectus voluptatibus in delectus est qui. Quisquam eos cum est quis aut optio. Rerum veniam quia quis hic ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”