Debt side MF or PERE
Hey all,
I am currently a senior graduating in May & I have 2 options on the table here. The first is an opportunity as an Analyst in debt production at a large capital markets firm (think Berkadia, Greystone, etc.), the office I’d be at specializes in MF & MF only.
The other is an Analyst role at a PERE firm (~$4bn aum). This firm does about 50% MF, and 50% everything else.
Both opportunities offer about the same base pay. 1st role offers a set bonus (about 15%) as well as a performance bonus & 2nd role allows me to immediately begin investing in deals as an Analyst.
I’m incredibly excited about/interested in both opportunities but I’m not really sure which path to go down. I’ve always said I’d like to end up on the principal side long term, but I know the debt side can be very lucrative as well so I’m at a bit of a crossroads. Does anyone have any advice on how to go about playing my cards here?
They both sounds like great options, but it really depends what your long-term goals are. If your ultimate goal is to go off on your own (this is where the real $ is in RE) then the REPE role seems like the obvious choice. The fact that you'll get exposure to more product types in the PE role is also a big pro early on in your career. It's also worth mentioning that it's much easier to move from the equity side to the debt side than vice versa.
Officia ea iste est eum et voluptatem. Impedit est et ut sed. Dolorem libero dolores itaque numquam magnam aut similique. Libero quis excepturi ipsam et voluptas commodi. Pariatur earum saepe eius expedita vel dolor. Et dolorum ea sunt est vel maxime.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...