15 Comments
 

Prudential Insurance and Prudential Financial (or Investment Management, PGIM) are two separate entities.  My impression or definition of LifeCo is a life insurance carrier trying to meet its future obligations getting steady core like returns.

Prudential Financial (now PGIM) is an investment management company that has 10 or so funds each with different return characteristics.  I don’t know what the funds are called today, but 15 years ago you had PRISA (core), PRISA II (value add), PRISA III (opportunistic), merchant bank (OpCo investing), probably a Mezz program, and several separate accounts.  
 

The definitions seem a bit confusing (LifeCo, MF, etc) but I consider these Mega Funds, plural.  

Have compassion as well as ambition and you’ll go far in life. I am interested in digital immortality. Check out my blog at digitalimmortality.com
 
Most Helpful

Of who you listed, people in RE know PGIM has a better investment reputation and better relationships with sponsors than than KKR, TPG, Bain, and Apollo. At least in equity.

That being said, LifeCo rep in the biz is driven mainly by being a much earlier entrant into RE than PE firms. MetLife built StuyTown in the 1940s. PGIM created the first ODCE fund in the 1970s.

All the PE firms pay better, especially at the junior level. But will also work you harder. Lifecos are overstaffed less economics to share. Lifeco is also an unfair term at least on equity side as all the big ones have sophisticated built out very large fund platforms with third party investors.

If you're a junior person you should be pretty agnostic, but I guess working harder is correlated with learning more. If you're experienced (Associate + Sr Associate), your target should probably be PE as Lifecos are core and open end product biased = less/no carry to allocate. PE firm would put you on a better path to get that. Clarion, BGO, CBRE GI, LaSalle are in similar boats. Key lesson if you're experienced is avoid predominance of capital coming from open end or core. Yes learned this mistake personally...

 

As someone who worked at a Life Co - they won’t allocate you carry but they will allocate you ‘phantom carry.’ So for example, my life co paid out dollars based on phantom equity provided, which would vest on a 4 year schedule and had the ability to increase in value based on earnings of the company. Effectively it was their way of competing with carry and making your compensation more in line with PE firms. 

 

Megafund as a distinction is a little relevant in corporate PE because larger fund sizes means you do larger deals, which theoretically are different from smaller deals (and there are pros and cons to working on large vs mid vs small cap deals). Just my opinion, but the distinction is less meaningful in real estate since funds of all sizes will look at similar deals (with some exceptions for firms that focus on portfolio/corporate transactions and micro funds). Will you get similar underwriting experiences working for pgim as you would ares? Probably since you'll be looking at the same deals. Are they equivalent? You probably want to look at location, firm culture, promotion track, comp, etc.

 

Who fucking cares. They buy RE. Period. 

Seriously. I don't understand the point of this thread other than some 22 year old bragging to his friends that he works at a "megafund" 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

In addition to my comment above I’ll add this-there is a saying: “Prudential trains the street” because so many people get and got their start at the Firm. Personally, I would never work at a big PE firm. Just not for me. And would choose PGIM every day of the week. But I think I’m a bit different than many on here because I’m more concerned with my lifestyle and less concerned with maximum dollars. My expectation is to make my money from my current and future investments and not from my salary and bonus. 

 

Cumque aut odio consequatur aut ratione sunt aut. Modi earum laudantium voluptatem qui tenetur esse. Ad facere veniam aliquid veritatis impedit voluptatem autem. Nostrum impedit earum consectetur omnis ullam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”