Those who left RE, where did you end up?

I am curious about those who left CRE or REIB, where did you end up? I wonder if anyone did RE -> MBA -> non-RE or some variation of that, or if RE is a sticky field. You see a lot of IB into RE but never RE into something else.

Comments (46)

5mo 
Bmas96, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Bump 

5mo 
cre-23, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I've seen RE to HF, RE to Tech, RE to IB, RE to Consulting. Real Estate tends to be sticky because people enjoy the asset class and the money is pretty solid, but you certainly build a skill set that is transferable to other fields. 

5mo 
Bmas96, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Asking a genuine question here - in what way do you feel like the RE skill set is transferrable to other industries? Setting aside the soft skills gained from RE, from my perspective (having worked across a couple different segments of the industry over 3.5 years) it seems like the hard skills you gain in RE are pretty specific to RE itself. For example - obviously there are parallels between valuing a property and say valuing a company if you work in M&A, but the degree of complexity in valuing a company exceeds that of valuing a property by such a wide margin that I'm not sure how useful the RE background truly is. Point being, while there is a bit of overlap between an RE job function and consulting, IB, etc, that overlap doesn't seem strong enough to ever convince an employer to hire the person with an RE background over someone with a background in the applicable industry (obviously there are rare exceptions to this).        

  • 3
5mo 
cre-23, what's your opinion? Comment below:

The RE background isn't useful in valuing a company you are right on that front. But the skills as a junior is mainly excel, PowerPoint, knowing formulas, and there are some soft skills that transfer as well like presentation skills. You don't need your skills to be 1:1, especially as a junior, but RE can help you build a decent baseline. I mean, accountants switch to IB, consultants go to PE, and I've seen RE people go all over.

5mo 
Ozymandia, what's your opinion? Comment below:
Bmas96

Asking a genuine question here - in what way do you feel like the RE skill set is transferrable to other industries? Setting aside the soft skills gained from RE, from my perspective (having worked across a couple different segments of the industry over 3.5 years) it seems like the hard skills you gain in RE are pretty specific to RE itself. For example - obviously there are parallels between valuing a property and say valuing a company if you work in M&A, but the degree of complexity in valuing a company exceeds that of valuing a property by such a wide margin that I'm not sure how useful the RE background truly is.

Valuing a building is just as difficult as valuing a company.  Especially seeing as the level of knowledge needed to accurately put together a pro forma for a building far exceeds what the average M&A or PE analyst needs.  

Merely pushing back on this assumption (clearly not from a RE person) that acquisitions is simple or even less difficult or complex than purchasing a company.  After all, most buildings are owned by an LLC, and thus are a company in and of themselves.

  • 3
  • 14
  • Associate 1 in CorpDev
5mo 
[Comment removed by mod team]
5mo 
pere_85382, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Dude did you really just compare a property being owned by an LLC as equivalent to a traditional OpCo…

  • 2
  • 1
5mo 
Ozymandia, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I was being facetious about the LLC issue!

But as a previous reply indicated, modeling and diligence can be as complex or as simple as you want it to be for both a company or a single-building asset (let alone a large portfolio of assets).

  • 1
  • Principal in RE - Comm
5mo 

Real estate modeling is much simpler than corporate valuation.

HOWEVER, if you're intelligent and actually understand the "concepts" of valuation, it is transferrable - there is just a small knowledge gap where you would need to make some calls

  • 1
5mo 
Ozymandia, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Real estate modeling is much simpler than corporate valuation.

Well, "modeling" and "forecasting/valuating" aren't the same. I agree that a real estate model is generally easier (though not always... in fact, once you get into underwriting portfolios across multiple municipalities which may have alternative sources of financing, it rapidly becomes much more difficult), but that wasn't the question.  The post I was responding to was specifically talking about "valuation"... and when you think about valuing a real estate asset, a ton of additional factors come into play that really don't when you talk about valuing a company.  Perhaps few people do it, but knowing what kind of pipes are in the walls, knowing how many layers of water-based paint are on top of that lead-based paint, or how much asbestos is left in the boiler room, knowing groundwater levels and the condition of the roof across every square inch... all of this should be part of a real estate valuation, and only isn't because of the constraints of the diligence period.  The fact that those details often get ignored when a similarly granular detail for an operating company will be explored isn't a reflection on the intrinsic difficulty of valuing each type of asset.

  • 3
  • 1
  • Principal in RE - Comm
5mo 

You're missing the forest for the trees. If you don't think this applies to corporate valuation (small details that are often overlooked because of time), you're delusional

  • 1
  • 1
Most Helpful
5mo 
Ozymandia, what's your opinion? Comment below:

You're missing the forest for the trees. If you don't think this applies to corporate valuation (small details that are often overlooked because of time), you're delusional

I'm sure it does.  But you can say "you're missing the forest for the trees" all you want... but saying it won't make it so.  I've looked at investment pitches from PE companies, and did not get the sense that they were doing meaningfully more diligence or drilling down into more detail than a fellow real estate owner would in their pitch deck.  Obviously you don't see the full extent of diligence being done in what is effectively a summary, but that goes for real estate as well!

I understand that asking the question "show me all the diligence you do!" is ridiculous, since it takes months and even listing what you look for would take a ton of time you probably don't want to spend, but I also reject the idea that you (generically) get to assert "corporate valuation is more complex than real estate valuation" and then decline to produce a single shred of evidence for that assertion and walk away.  If you want to value a newly built warehouse for which Amazon has a 20 year lease, then sure... that's super easy.  What happens when you have a portfolio of several assets, scattered across three states, which all have tax credits with different placed in service dates, different types of subsidy contracts, differing tax regimes and housing authorities and attorneys general to deal with, etc etc?  It gets a lot tougher just on the regulatory front, before you even get into the assets themselves.  Likewise, a cargo airline with fixed contracts seems like a pretty darn easy analysis, on par with a single asset LLC in real estate.  Some multinational conglomerate is going to be much more difficult.

Which is why making the blanket statement "corporate valuation is harder" is silly.  Even on average, it doesn't seem to me to be meaningfully more difficult, and the fact that no one seems capable of explaining why beyond saying "it is" is the kind of response which leads me to believe that there is less to it than the PE industry wants me to think.  That's a generic observation, by the way - any time anyone cannot explain to you the complexity in a given issue, it either doesn't exist or the person you're talking to doesn't understand it, either.

  • 7
5mo 
jarstar1, what's your opinion? Comment below:

If you do development, you should have a great project management skillset, and sure while most of your knowledge is very specific to real estate (zoning, building code, construction, etc.) the broader brushstrokes are definitely transferable. You have experience running a multi-disciplinary team, coordination between multiple groups of people with conflicting interests, leveling/negotiating contracts, dealing with government authorities/regulation, work with multiple capital partners and understand the P&L of a project, able to learn on the go and pivot quickly, understanding the basics of legal docs (understanding how to negotiate contracts is extremely underrated in development), manage multiple projects at once, etc. 

  • Analyst 1 in PE - LBOs
5mo 

If you work in opportunistic RE, just like in a lot of infra, the modelling is identical to modelling corporates/ standard PE.

You may also be dealing with special situation deals which again are similar to coming into a special sit from a corporate perspective, whether from debt or equity.

Some deals you do also involve building out operating company platforms (check out e.g. Blackstone's European logistics platform) which again blurs the line between RE and corproate PE.

Some asset classes are also covered by REPE funds that are covered by infra funds/ regular PE funds elsewhere.

  • 2
  • Associate 1 in CorpDev
5mo 
[Comment removed by mod team]
5mo 
ForeverAnAnalyst, what's your opinion? Comment below:

My path was CRE Acquisition (3y) > IB (3y non-RE related) > Corp Strategic Finance. Exit to anything is possible if you can tell a good story to sell yourself and try hard enough.

5mo 
thearchivist, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Can I PM you? Curious to hear how you did it. I'm trying to do the same move (I'm 2.5 years RE acquisitions)

5mo 
RR898, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I worked at a RE services firm for a few years before leaving to get an MBA and law degree. One day to land a role in IB.

5mo 
yayaa, what's your opinion? Comment below:

feel bad for anybody who left the real estate field. no field is better....

  • 1
  • Analyst 1 in RE - Comm
5mo 

Have you worked in others and if so, which ? Also; why do you think its better? Just curious.

5mo 
Pug, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Residential real estate -> Vertical Developer/ GC -> Tech (Infra SWE)

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
5mo 
Pug, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Yes

“The three most harmful addictions are heroin, carbohydrates, and a monthly salary.” - Nassim Taleb
4mo 
Ricky Sargulesh, what's your opinion? Comment below:

That's cool.  Did you do a coding bootcamp or something?

Array
4mo 
StringerBellRE, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Also curious about this. That's an interesting pivot 

Run the money up i'm on that real estate shit - 21 Savage
  • Director in RE - Comm
5mo 

I left to go live in a van down by the river...

But in reality, I have not left CRE yet (work for a CBRE/JLL/Cushman type firm). Strongly considering trying to make a switch to something in the proptech field. 

I have friends and colleagues who have left to do a wide range of things: personal trainer, reiki healer, web developer...just to list off the obscure ones. But mostly, I've met a handful of people who have left traditional CRE to work as corporate real estate managers, and shift around in the ranks from CRE to non-CRE activities within their respective organizations. That's the main one I see.

5mo 
skibb, what's your opinion? Comment below:

A mentor of mine did undergrad --> brokerage (think CBRE, Eastdil, JLL) --> Harvard MBA --> traditional PE

5mo 
redever, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Back after 08-GFC, saw some people leave CRE for bartending......

Most actually made it back in just a few years.

That aside... I've known people go from RE to tech, corp. fin, commercial banking, government/non-profit, law school (does that count?), and various forms of non-re related entrepreneurship/startups/small-biz opps (for some reason seem to be many who buy/open nightclubs and restaurants... go figure). 

The reality is that anything in the "business/finance" world is totally doable from CRE, sure you may need to learn certain technicals, but come on..... it's not like trying to become a heart surgeon or opera singer..... business/investing is all the same at its core, I'm sure you can move to anything if you really want it bad enough. (I'm discounting stuff like I-banking or firms/fields that basically require tons of pedigree and/or luck/connections to get hired within, that may not happen even for those with "perfect" backgrounds)

Of course, as many know and has been said above... real estate is found to better/cooler and often higher paid than a lot of other jobs/fields in the business world. Real estate is the "exit op" as they say! 

  • Analyst 1 in RE - Comm
5mo 

You are just tooting your own horn by saying real estate is the exit opp. I'm sure if there was one, definitive exit opp to select, it wouldn't so obviously or at least without significant debate, be real estate. Talk about having a bias.

5mo 
redever, what's your opinion? Comment below:

LOL... you too "THE" wayyy to literally.... I was not implying mutual exclusivity.... I think most readers get the point, real estate is the desired outcome for most of those who seek it. The ratio of those looking to get in vastly outpaces those looking to leave. Just look around WSO... people from banking, accounting, consulting, and all other sorts of fields come here to get advice/tips on getting into real estate. Do people leave.... of course! It's not for everyone, but clearly the ratio is quite slighted.

As to bias...... this is the WSO Real Estate Forum... exactly what else would you expect! 

4mo 
Ozymandia, what's your opinion? Comment below:

You are just tooting your own horn by saying real estate is the exit opp. I'm sure if there was one, definitive exit opp to select, it wouldn't so obviously or at least without significant debate, be real estate. Talk about having a bias.

It might be the top exit opp for him.  I wouldn't go back into IB, or work for a PE shop, for almost any amount of money.  Much rather be in real estate.

Everyone has a bias, all the time.  Since there is no objective "best" choice, you should have been following your own advice and understood that @redever is talking about his own best exit, not yours.

  • 1
  • 1
4mo 
earthwalker7, what's your opinion? Comment below:

I went from REPE to PE (growth capital). I'm not sure it was a smart move, but I really found RE boring as an asset class and thought general growth PE / tech growth PE more interesting. REPE made way more money though. You get a lot more capital leverage in REPE.  We ran a $1B first-time fund in REPE with a team of 10, levered it up, returned 80% IRR (not a joke, it was nuts) and made the ibank we were attached to a killing. Moving to PE was a huge financial mistake, but then again, much more interesting. 

Were the skills transferable? Yes and no. Obviously there is modeling and IM writing in both REPE and PE. But the models are totally different so what I had learned in REPE wasn't directly applicable to PE modeling. And the asset-specific knowledge and market/economic/macro thinking I had gathered up to that point in REPE was all thrown out. I had worked in RE development prior to REPE, so all that knowledge about how to get developments done was discarded. 

4mo 
wunderk, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Aliquid id quidem et a. Earum quaerat et minima sit iusto. Et aut soluta qui doloremque sed omnis error. Velit ea facere ipsa et.

Qui doloribus corrupti suscipit dolores neque et aut. Expedita architecto quasi consequatur qui cum voluptatibus sint.

Ea voluptas et aliquid enim numquam. Nobis autem est libero corrupti. Magnam doloribus corporis et neque.

Maxime magni ut mollitia qui. Error odio nam cumque fuga nostrum fugit. Inventore dolor aut aut sint enim nulla voluptatem perferendis. Non quo natus corrupti delectus.

Start Discussion

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2023 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres (+ +) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International (= =) 99.1%
  • Jefferies & Company (▽02) 98.6%
  • Financial Technology Partners (▽01) 98.2%
  • William Blair (▲11) 97.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2023 Investment Banking

  • William Blair (▲05) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International (▲11) 99.1%
  • Canaccord Genuity (▲17) 98.6%
  • Stephens Inc (▲10) 98.1%
  • Financial Technology Partners (▲04) 97.7%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2023 Investment Banking

  • Financial Technology Partners (▲05) 99.5%
  • Lincoln International (▲01) 99.1%
  • Lazard Freres (▲14) 98.6%
  • Jefferies & Company (▽03) 98.1%
  • William Blair (▲03) 97.7%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2023 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (6) $592
  • Vice President (27) $425
  • Associates (141) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (9) $194
  • 2nd Year Analyst (86) $170
  • 1st Year Analyst (266) $170
  • Intern/Summer Associate (45) $165
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (194) $92