Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +112 | Is anybody just going to leave the industry? | 39 | 34m |
| +41 | CRE Recruiting for a Career - crazy? | 10 | 7h |
| +31 | Exits from REPE | 16 | 6h |
| +26 | Multifamily firms collpasing in Dallas whose next? | 8 | 3d |
| +25 | Arbor Realty Trust in 2026 | 13 | 1h |
| +23 | Red Flag? Commissions-only acquisitions roles | 8 | 4h |
| +21 | Q3/Q4 CRE Job Market Optimism (or lack thereof) | 10 | 5h |
| +18 | LOI Underwriting / Due Diligence | 1 | 1d |
| +15 | NYC Real Estate Job Market | 6 | 4h |
| +13 | Family Office vs REPE | 9 | 5h |
Career Resources
IRR is the discount rate required to make NPV = 0. If IRR is significantly better than the perceived discount rate, on paper it looks like a good investment... not following here. They are essentially the same calculation, just solving for a different part of the equation.
Agreed. I guess I was coming at it differently in that: why do we use a capitalisation method for real estate valuations as opposed to a corporate DCF method (with cost of equity, WACC, terminal growth rate assumptions and all). Then started wondering if I modelled out a real estate project like a corporate DCF, would the output TEV / EV (or GAV / NAV I guess) be reconcilable to a set of real estate cashflows for a given target levered IRR.
If talking about the 3 valuations method, the DCF approach is a part of the income approach methodology.
Unlike a corporate operating business, where projecting out future performance is simple and accurate.
DCF is the most common valuation method for commercial real estate. Is this thread AI generated?
Et odit consequuntur vel voluptas dolorem. Tempore dolor enim suscipit sit non aut. Non in est et qui et sed exercitationem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Officiis esse ut in eum natus doloribus. Inventore ratione sit quidem maxime qui earum. Nam et voluptate sapiente dolorem. Quo repellendus enim aut aut cum nisi omnis.
Blanditiis qui eos aut ducimus non voluptas. Sit architecto quam amet iusto quae voluptatem. Reiciendis ut dolorum quidem quasi et. Blanditiis laboriosam voluptatem aspernatur. Labore laudantium est ducimus et consequuntur cumque.
Eligendi quos alias sint ipsam. Et deleniti recusandae in recusandae. Voluptatem doloremque ut fugit modi accusamus.
Inventore provident voluptatem dolore asperiores nisi perferendis. Ipsum in velit quo perferendis neque enim.