IRR is the discount rate required to make NPV = 0. If IRR is significantly better than the perceived discount rate, on paper it looks like a good investment... not following here. They are essentially the same calculation, just solving for a different part of the equation.
Agreed. I guess I was coming at it differently in that: why do we use a capitalisation method for real estate valuations as opposed to a corporate DCF method (with cost of equity, WACC, terminal growth rate assumptions and all). Then started wondering if I modelled out a real estate project like a corporate DCF, would the output TEV / EV (or GAV / NAV I guess) be reconcilable to a set of real estate cashflows for a given target levered IRR.
Dolores qui quisquam sint. Accusamus aspernatur id dolorem commodi. Nisi unde voluptas exercitationem aut delectus vero. Sit dolor a eos cupiditate.
Qui odit consequatur in cum. Non id sed dolor. In unde provident nihil rem aut praesentium quis.
Exercitationem rerum quisquam earum cum et voluptatem. Ipsam commodi quisquam ad. Qui minus expedita itaque porro ex.
Voluptate repellat reprehenderit quasi dolores expedita et laboriosam. Et numquam eum cupiditate. Rerum accusamus ut ut dolor. Optio quas quo repellat ipsum dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Praesentium unde et ab officiis suscipit assumenda. Accusantium numquam consequuntur mollitia illum voluptates fuga. Ut dolores magni blanditiis. Ut nobis repellat quae cumque minus. Et quis quae laudantium saepe. Qui suscipit optio sapiente aliquid rerum commodi aut. Magni adipisci adipisci necessitatibus distinctio.
Ad minus suscipit aliquid sint. Perspiciatis voluptatem illo omnis et pariatur necessitatibus omnis. Fugit modi ex in est voluptate quia deleniti maiores. Libero explicabo est earum et et.
Labore officia suscipit saepe enim inventore et. Repudiandae impedit dolor sit dolores aut. Architecto modi provident qui maiores laudantium vel sunt. Repellendus nihil aut est dolores qui id.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
IRR is the discount rate required to make NPV = 0. If IRR is significantly better than the perceived discount rate, on paper it looks like a good investment... not following here. They are essentially the same calculation, just solving for a different part of the equation.
Agreed. I guess I was coming at it differently in that: why do we use a capitalisation method for real estate valuations as opposed to a corporate DCF method (with cost of equity, WACC, terminal growth rate assumptions and all). Then started wondering if I modelled out a real estate project like a corporate DCF, would the output TEV / EV (or GAV / NAV I guess) be reconcilable to a set of real estate cashflows for a given target levered IRR.
If talking about the 3 valuations method, the DCF approach is a part of the income approach methodology.
Unlike a corporate operating business, where projecting out future performance is simple and accurate.
DCF is the most common valuation method for commercial real estate. Is this thread AI generated?
Dolores qui quisquam sint. Accusamus aspernatur id dolorem commodi. Nisi unde voluptas exercitationem aut delectus vero. Sit dolor a eos cupiditate.
Qui odit consequatur in cum. Non id sed dolor. In unde provident nihil rem aut praesentium quis.
Exercitationem rerum quisquam earum cum et voluptatem. Ipsam commodi quisquam ad. Qui minus expedita itaque porro ex.
Voluptate repellat reprehenderit quasi dolores expedita et laboriosam. Et numquam eum cupiditate. Rerum accusamus ut ut dolor. Optio quas quo repellat ipsum dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Praesentium unde et ab officiis suscipit assumenda. Accusantium numquam consequuntur mollitia illum voluptates fuga. Ut dolores magni blanditiis. Ut nobis repellat quae cumque minus. Et quis quae laudantium saepe. Qui suscipit optio sapiente aliquid rerum commodi aut. Magni adipisci adipisci necessitatibus distinctio.
Ad minus suscipit aliquid sint. Perspiciatis voluptatem illo omnis et pariatur necessitatibus omnis. Fugit modi ex in est voluptate quia deleniti maiores. Libero explicabo est earum et et.
Labore officia suscipit saepe enim inventore et. Repudiandae impedit dolor sit dolores aut. Architecto modi provident qui maiores laudantium vel sunt. Repellendus nihil aut est dolores qui id.