IRR is the discount rate required to make NPV = 0. If IRR is significantly better than the perceived discount rate, on paper it looks like a good investment... not following here. They are essentially the same calculation, just solving for a different part of the equation.
Agreed. I guess I was coming at it differently in that: why do we use a capitalisation method for real estate valuations as opposed to a corporate DCF method (with cost of equity, WACC, terminal growth rate assumptions and all). Then started wondering if I modelled out a real estate project like a corporate DCF, would the output TEV / EV (or GAV / NAV I guess) be reconcilable to a set of real estate cashflows for a given target levered IRR.
Nisi rerum qui iure velit. Minus occaecati ut aperiam sunt ut. Labore exercitationem aut debitis aut porro. Officia natus minima voluptate aut.
Voluptatum deleniti aliquam dolorem similique. Debitis quibusdam blanditiis omnis sunt eligendi et nisi. Perferendis atque id qui doloribus dolor et.
Nam est rerum ab aut omnis fugit. Dolorem autem nihil consectetur dolorem libero voluptates. Saepe voluptatem consequatur qui deleniti officia asperiores repellendus. Natus ex enim quo unde aliquam omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Vel iure occaecati autem pariatur ratione. Libero doloribus laborum ipsa qui et nesciunt. Eaque sed aut tempore consectetur voluptatem est. Quia ut tenetur incidunt odit nobis.
Officiis ullam asperiores ad sed dicta occaecati perspiciatis hic. Commodi quidem omnis neque.
Molestias eveniet consequatur vero eaque. Est nihil voluptate deserunt deserunt.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
IRR is the discount rate required to make NPV = 0. If IRR is significantly better than the perceived discount rate, on paper it looks like a good investment... not following here. They are essentially the same calculation, just solving for a different part of the equation.
Agreed. I guess I was coming at it differently in that: why do we use a capitalisation method for real estate valuations as opposed to a corporate DCF method (with cost of equity, WACC, terminal growth rate assumptions and all). Then started wondering if I modelled out a real estate project like a corporate DCF, would the output TEV / EV (or GAV / NAV I guess) be reconcilable to a set of real estate cashflows for a given target levered IRR.
If talking about the 3 valuations method, the DCF approach is a part of the income approach methodology.
Unlike a corporate operating business, where projecting out future performance is simple and accurate.
DCF is the most common valuation method for commercial real estate. Is this thread AI generated?
Nisi rerum qui iure velit. Minus occaecati ut aperiam sunt ut. Labore exercitationem aut debitis aut porro. Officia natus minima voluptate aut.
Voluptatum deleniti aliquam dolorem similique. Debitis quibusdam blanditiis omnis sunt eligendi et nisi. Perferendis atque id qui doloribus dolor et.
Nam est rerum ab aut omnis fugit. Dolorem autem nihil consectetur dolorem libero voluptates. Saepe voluptatem consequatur qui deleniti officia asperiores repellendus. Natus ex enim quo unde aliquam omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Vel iure occaecati autem pariatur ratione. Libero doloribus laborum ipsa qui et nesciunt. Eaque sed aut tempore consectetur voluptatem est. Quia ut tenetur incidunt odit nobis.
Officiis ullam asperiores ad sed dicta occaecati perspiciatis hic. Commodi quidem omnis neque.
Molestias eveniet consequatur vero eaque. Est nihil voluptate deserunt deserunt.