Best PCA/Secondary Advisory Groups
Hi all, I'm currently a bit over a year into a role working at a small international boutique placement agent doing private client advisory (GP fundraising & secondary advisory). I'm looking into applying for some roles in the same area, leaning more towards secondary's, but still very open to more fundraising focused seats.
I'm trying to get as much info as possible on the different groups across the street. I know PJT Park Hill, Evercore, and Lazard are probably the best players in this space and I'd love to get some insight on hours & culture for those groups.
Outside of the EB's, I'm a bit more in the dark as to who the best players are. More focused on banks here rather than independent boutiques (I know who most of these firms are and I'm more interested in getting experience on a bigger platform).
Any input from the community around comp, culture, hours, and best shops in the space are greatly appreciated. WSO needs more info on this space as it's an awesome vertical to work in while having relatively little information & discussion on the market.
Below are my thoughts as a secondary market buyer (principal) in the space. I work with all of the groups and think of them as follows. If you want more details, please let me know:
Tier 1:
Evercore - Has become the highest volume group but quality is a bit behind Jefferies and Goldman
Goldman Sachs - New group that's ex-Lazard. Strongest sponsor coverage and execution capabilities
Jefferies - The 'brand name' in the business. Team is ex Greenhill (who were #1). Priority is GP stakes but they still do LP baskets
PJT Park Hill - highly regarded group. A bit behind jefferies and goldman in quality but still tier 1
Tier 2:
Campbell Lutyens - A bit behind Jefferies, Evercore, Lazard, but well respect and strong deal flow
Lazard - A step behind Jefferies, Goldman, Evercore. Have some staffing issues and going to focus more on GP-leds now.
Tier 3:
Afidity - Similiar to M20 but better quality.
Axon Partners - Similar to Cebile but slightly better quality. Low volume.
Citi - Pretty limited deal flow, not really a player
Credit Suisse - Pretty limited deal flow, not really a player
Duff & Phelps - Hairy/exotic transactions - more of a valuation advisory shop
Eaton Partners - Placement agent that sometimes does GP-leds. Good quality group.
Elm Capital - Similar to Cebile but slightly better quality
Fairview Capital Group - Placement agent that sometimes does GP-leds. Not as good quality as Eaton or Sixpoint.
Greenhill - Asia-Pac team is only group remaining. They're pretty much just doing LP-trades. Think they'll go under soon.
M20 - Just a hair above Cebile in quality. Still not great.
Melting Point Solutions - Similar to Cebile but slightly better quality
Rede Partners - Placement agent that sometimes does GP-leds. Dealflow isn't as strong as Sixpoint or Eaton. Good name for fundraising.
Sixpoint Partners - Placement agent that sometimes does GP-leds. Good quality group.
Triago - Similar to Cebile but slightly better quality
UBS Alternative Funds Advisory - Pretty limited deal flow, not really a player
Upwelling Capital Group - Similar to Cebile but slightly better quality, limited deal flow
Tier 4:
Brant Street Capital - Pretty much the same business as Setter Capital. High volume but low quality.
Cebile Capital - High volume business but pretty sloppy execution. More of a brokerage shop. Recently acquired by Raymond James - word is the acquisition isn't going well.
Mozaic Capital Advisors - Low volume. Not the best quality/name.
Setter Capital - Very high volume business but pretty sloppy execution. More of a brokerage shop. Poor reputation and generally disliked in the industry
Other:
Guggenheimn - Seems dead after the false start and exodus to Jefferies.
Rothschild - Not sure if going to get off the ground. GP led shop.
Houlihan - Not sure if going to get off the ground. GP led shop.
Tradition Private Markets - Not sure if going to get off the ground. GP led shop.
At a competitor so no horse in the race but would swap GS and LAZ. Has GS even closed any deals yet? Lazard has always focused and done well on the GP side and we frequently pitch against/lose mandates to them. That said, I definitely do not see them as a serious competitor on the LP side. Regarding Jefferies, I'd disagree they're the brand name in the space (that's EVR). Cogent (Greenhill) dominated the LP side of the market but it's probably fair to wait and see how well they do targeting the GP side. Appreciate the info on the smaller players as we never really cross paths.
Appreciate the view - it's obviously very subjective. Here are more of my thoughts:
1. Until COVID, the GP-led market wasn't really a thing (comparatively speaking). The vast majority of deal flow was in plain vanilla basket sales and Greenhill had the best connections and best execution capabilities by a mile. When COVID hit and valuations went out the window the GP-led space boomed and coincidentally the fees for these super diversified LP sales were getting pretty thin (especially from the likes of pensions, it is a race to the bottom). On the other hand, GP-leds pay way fatter fees.
2. Evercore is a sweatshop. Their volume is phenomenal but volume isn't everything. Everyone I know at EVR is freaking miserable and they still are understaffed despite having an army of associates.
3. GS is unlike any other group in that they have full integration with their M&A and Sponsor coverage groups. Imagine having a single unified pitch to a GP to see your full suite of exit options as opposed to being solicited by 3-4 different verticals within the same IB, all competing for the same business.
4. LAZ: Just not really a fan of some of the staff there, to be frank. Find them pretty arrogant. I've always preferred working with other shops...also they have a staffing hole right now.
I appreciate you writing all of this out but your list is colored in some very particular ways that I would not at all say are reflective of industry sentiment. Goldman literally just entered this space and I have not heard of a single deal they have printed. To put them above places like EVR/PJT and even LAZ is pretty questionable as you’re essentially ascribing more value to hype than results.
Similar story with JEFF. They are currently essentially the former GHL LP team under the same roof as GP-focused leavers from other more established shops. I agree that the team is very strong in its constituent pieces, but as a combined unit they are very much still proving themselves. Pretty biased IMO to suggest that these guys and Goldman are the best in any way. It would be as if McKinsey opened a restructuring IB practice tomorrow and you put them above PJT on the rationale that McKinsey is really good at the other stuff they’ve been doing this whole time.
Ask anyone who is a practitioner right now and they likely respond that EVR is enjoying its moment in the spotlight, having successfully capitalized on the COVID dislocation to bring forth good single asset and multi asset FCV deals. This doesn’t make them the “best”, but it does reflect the current (transient) state of play.
Goldman and Jeff on the other hand are very much two of the umpteen new entrants to the field - all of them betting big on secondaries while aggressively poaching top talent from the EVR/PJT/GHL incumbents.
Yep. It's colored by being on the buyside and actually having first hand experience dealing with these groups.
isn't GS secondary advisory just 2 ex-Lazard guys? haven't even built out their team yet
also, can you speak to culture and upward mobility at EVR/GS/JEF/PJT/LAZ? taking it those are the 5 main players
They are all going to have similar pay and mobility if you're coming in as an associate. The reason why I harped on Jefferies being T1 quality comes down to reputation of the principals. As of late I have seen Evercore F-up auctions where they get 30+ buyers to do DD and stage a multi-round process and then allow an aggressive buyer to circumvent the entire process - it's pretty disrespectful and those kind of actions spread negatively around the industry. I have worked for 10 years with the staff at Jefferies and that kind of behavior doesn't get tolerated.
In terms of culture, it depends what's important to you. Evercore has the highest volume of deal flow so if you want to learn then that's probably your best bet. At the same time, they are under-staffed for their volume and it's incredibly busy and stressful.
Lazard is slightly better (from what I am told) - they focus way more on GP-leds, which are pretty interesting, but you won't get the same experience if you're only covering that part of the market.
So I am not the only one feeling the same way about Setter? I think its like a modern day version of a boiler room in there.
Kinda sad to see what happened at Houlihan and Greenhill, the former was the name when it came to hairy GP-leds when Jeff Sanabria led the team. Greenhill was the name in LP-leds until that team left. Both are as good as dead now. Goes to show how competitive the war for talent in secondaries is. Must be good to be on the PCA side at one of the Tier 1 shops.
I'm in NY and every time I go to a networking event one of the topics of conversation is how sh*t Setter is - terrible approach of showing fake deals to buyers, super sloppy pitches, no execution support, egregious fees - the list goes on and on. We now have them go direct to our junk mail box.
Isn't Houlihan now being run by the guy that ran CS? Not much faith in him? Just curious.
Definitely sad what Houlihan's become. They used to have a cooler name too I feel like before (something like Illiquid Financial Assets group?) They worked on the most complex, hairy stuff. Good for those ex- co-heads though. They now head Manulife's secondary investing efforts and probably make carry and bank. Those co-heads left and their "head" person is just expired and molded breadcrumbs of secondaries advisory
Any intel on Capstone?
They're primarily a placement agent and have done some incredible raises - Whitehorse (lol), TR, L Capital.
I've only seen some very small and infrequent secondaries from them
I might move CS to Tier 2 - solid GP-led recently.
PJT Park Hill deal fow recently has been a bit limited.
GS - as mentioned, not sure they've even launched a transaction yet
Otherwise really good list
The head guy from CS just moved to Houlihan to set up a team - not sure if anything is going to come of it. I rarely saw anything decent on the GP led side from CS to be honest.
CS is definitely a Tier 3 and have been for quite some time. The person that left for Houlihan was a lame duck Director with a poor reputation, attitude and appearance who was constantly being nudged to leave. He had never brought in revenue and yet complained for years that he couldn't get promoted. He's amongst the oldest dudes in Secondary Advisory and there's a high competition for talent that Houlihan just brought him in as they had no other options.
damn these are the kind of comments I live for. We are talking about Sameer right? lol
Interested in hearing more about Sameer Shamsi. Can you elaborate. Have heard nothing but terrible and sad things about this incel being.
Lol bro. Chill. This forum is hilarious but holy shit.
I'm still laughing my ass off regarding this comment. Good times.
Care to elaborate? We can trade stories
I have no dirt on him and hardly ever dealt with him tbh. Wasn't he a founding member at Evercore's PCA team? Surprised he would be so disliked.
Is this the same Sameer that does elephant walks on the weekends, beta orbits around young NYU girls at bars and complains to everyone in Secondaries why he can't make Managing Director?
The Sameer we are referring to is the Head of Secondaries (MD) at HL. Same dude?
This 'ranking' is mostly right. But GS and Jefferies teams are brand new... they haven't even done a deal yet. Therefore, they cannot be categorized as a Tier 1.
In terms of rankings, it's really Evercore at the very top and then everyone else.
This is incorrect. Jefferies certainly has done 'a deal' - they've been in business for a year and have done many deals - in fact I've won one of them.
Jeffries isn't brand new, they've brought a steady flow of LP deals to market since launch and have started a few GP-leds as well.
Evercore at the top for GP-led, but their LP isn't great, probably by design due to lower fees.
UBS private funds group. The most low key group in that bank. Does primary and secondary transactions across PE And RE. Lots of deal flow. On par with EVR.
UBS is not on par with EVR for secondaries
UBS? More like BS. Not a player.
lmfao quit capping - you just got screwed over in the placement process bud. i've been there
try to lateral to a top player in a year and you'll be in a cushy spot. good luck
Stop playin
.
Very helpful. Would you mind sending me a PM?
Curious for more detail on your thoughts on Cebile (sorry know this is an old post)
Double post by accident. See above.
Do the people on the PCA teams doing GP-leds actually find the work intellectually stimulating? Since you will mainly be dealing with sophisiticated financial sponsors on those transactions, how much value can you add past the transaction execution process? I would think the GP has a good idea where the business or portfolio can trade for and if not, wouldnt the industry banker at the IB be the person doing the heavy lifting around valuation and deal pricing?
As an advisor you have to have a very good grasp of the businesses as you'll be fielding lots of questions from buyers. You job isn't to turn and hand the questions to the GP, its to answer them yourself.
Not sure about intellectually stimulating but their bank accounts look far richer!
Some of the fees for these GP leds are ridiculous. Recently I saw:
-2/20 fee structure with 30% carry after a 2x MoC (lol - if I am doing a GP led I expect a minimum 2.5-3x tbh).
-150 bps upfront fee to GP (why?!?)
-400 bps structuring fee (probably to cover the IB costs, but still, that's high for a 500m+ deal)
Good lord if this is true
Wait a minute, the management fees and carry go to the underlying GP, not the broker running the deal. I imagine the PCA groups are making a few points on the NAV of the transaction. Very good and I'd say fairly easy money to make since a lot of these deals are quite large and can easily be placed with secondary buyers if the GP and assets are high quality. But yes, the carry structure on some of these deals to the GP is insane, again, goes to show how competitive the space has become.
Any more thoughts on PJT?
Lost some talent recently but so has every good shop. One of the preeminent franchises in secondaries and I'm sure they'll pay you well.
They're still a Tier 1, but definitely lost a step with senior departures. Tier 1A: Evercore; Tier 1B: Park Hill and Lazard
^ this is correct
I think we should change this thread to "who is the worst advisory shop to work for".
Not gonna name the name but I think we all agree on who holds that distinguished title…
spill the tea
We have to at all costs keep this thread going. It's a gem.
Pretty crazy that we’ve got people gossiping about group heads here on WSO. That one guy you replied to before is absolutely wilding out
The power of anonymity I guess? It was pretty hilarious.
While there is a crowd gathered around the digital water cooler - why did we have to move from Yung Gunz to Next Gen Leaders??
Not very ESG friendly. To be fair, I always find it weird when they put lawyers on that list, or anyone from an allocator like CPP - praise for committing to a $800m co-invest which was brought to you directly by the likes of Ardian or Strat Partners = skill.
Let's award the folks digging for gems themselves.
Would not be surprised if you were a young gun yourself with all these shots being fired 🔫🔫
I can appreciate a good secondaries lawyer tbh. In my experience these deals can demand some legal creativity/commercial understanding from time to time and I’m down for that to be recognized.
But let’s also be honest, the whole thing is a also a popularity contest.
Would be curious if any buy side folks here can shed some light on their methodology for handicapping manager projections on the portfolio sale side. Looking for something more interesting/sophisticated than just goal seeking to whatever your IC is willing to cough up.
I take it you are referring to a GP-led, most likely restructuring or continuation fund? Well you could always tie their carry to outperformance and not a BS number like an 8% IRR. If I'm doing a single asset deal, or frankly any kind of GP-led deal I'm expecting returns well north of a 2.5x MOIC and 25%+ net IRR. If I delivered a net 8% on a deal I'd get fired.
Understandable - feel like market terms are very GP-friendly right now though given how hard people chased FCVs during 2020. How much traction do you get with that approach?
Also interested on the LP side if you have any thoughts. Obviously the underwrite is less surgical and higher level but curious whether and how buy side leverages their historical fund reporting to sensitize the (sometimes insane) projections made by the underlying GPs.
I have spoken with many current and former employees at EVR on the PCA team and the feedback is that the pay is obviously exceptionally strong, as is the deal flow and your access to speaking with top quality GPs, buyers, and sellers. However, they were all pretty consistent in saying that the average tenure on the team is very short and this is due to a widespread 'toxic' culture: extremely overworked, often short staffed, constant gaslighting. A group you may want to consider is Campbell Lutyens. They're smaller but the treatment will be better.
OP here, I appreciate the insight. Any chance you'd be willing to PM me so I can pick your brain a bit more?
as a fresh college grad, would you choose EVR PCA or JEFF PCA? perhaps JEFF has better upward mobility and better culture?
Both are going to be a serious grind based on the hierarchies they've set up. You'll see way more deal flow at EVR and the pay should be stronger. If you can survive 1-2 years at EVR I'd go for it but I'm told the average associate (let alone analyst) tenure is extremely short.
How does Goldman stack up against the EBs in terms of upward mobility and exits?
Circling back to this post, PEI just released their nominees for the Secondaries Awards 2021. Hopefully, it gives some context to the rankings in this post and on other threads. It's not a perfect metric but the trends do tell a story.
Europe Deal of the Year: Lazard (2x), Evercore
Europe Advisor of the Year: Campbell Lutyens, Credit Suisse, Evercore, Lazard
US Deal of the Year: Campbell Lutyens, Evercore (2x), PJT
US Advisor of the Year: Evercore, PJT, Lazard, M2O
Asia Deal of the Year: PJT, Campbell Lutyens, Evercore
Asia Advisor of the Year: Lazard, PJT, Evercore, Campbell Lutyens
It all suggests that there is a global tier 1 of: Evercore, Lazard, PJT, and to a lesser extent, Campbell Lutyens. I wouldn't overthink it - these are the main players as of today. Yes, Goldman (insert any other new group) could become a major player but as of today they are not yet established at the top.
Sounds like the Jefferies team has their work cut out for them
The whole PEI deal of the year stuff is mostly non-sense... at least the nominees. Just bombard Adam Le (like the one and only news editor in the PE secondaries world) to put you on the list and he will be coerced to do exactly that (e.g. get down on your knees and open your mouth).
I heard that the incel of Credit Suisse's ex head of secondaries who peaked at Director used to do this regularly. lol!
Why is there so much hate against him? Granted, I'm on the buyside so my experience may be different to those on his team but I always found him to be very pleasant to deal with.
Apart from that, I agree with you on the PEI deal of the year stuff. IR from all the secondary funds just bombard that bullsh*t "news" source. It's all politics, same with that young guns nonsense.
Hi guys, as a junior this thread has been super helpful and interesting!
Interviewing with a PCA team for an entry level position. Have prior IB sector coverage internship and other general finance experience. What can one expect in terms of technicals on an interview? Same as an IB interview i.e comps, DCF and LBOs? Or since this isn't a modelling heavy team, questions are usually fit based? I assume LP leads are usually no modelling but mostly placement and sales process. What about GP leads? Does one model around the valuation of a GP lead single asset deal?
Standard IB technicals + knowledge of the secondary market. Might be some questions related to secondaries specific modeling (IMO mainly GP/LP waterfalls from an LBO) I would spend the time shoring up the classic IB questions and reading a lot about the market, the types of deals that are getting done etc.
Who are the best groups for secondary directs?
Directs, as in GP-led single asset carve outs? Or, directs as in buying shares in private unicorns? For the former if say Evercore, Lazard, and Credit Suisse. For the latter, it's a real mixed bag and is more akin to brokering than secondary advisory.
Thanks. Any recs in the second bucket? Have only really come across Setter.
Mirae and Saxon Weber. Setter is utter garbage. They remind me of used car salesmen.
Hi folks
I have a case study with a Private capital advisory business at an EB (Lazard/Evercore/PJT). Has anyone undergone something similar? Would anyone know what it could be? Would seriously appreciate any help and reward with silver bananas!
They advise both LP and GP leds. How does one value an LP led vs a GP led?
Are the NAVs on the LP leds valued at book values or using comps on EV EBITDA basis?
For GP Leds I would assume this is mostly an LBO valuation?
Thanks!
OP here. Just finished a first round the other day with one of those firms as well for a PCA role. Any chance you could PM me? I'd love to hear more about your process so far. I haven't had a project/case study for the LAZ/EVR/PJT process yet, but have done one for another established independent placement agent recently if you want some color there.
Hi guys,
Have an hour long case study at one of the PA shops mentioned on this thread. This is an entry level position. Any idea on what the case study could be? They do both GP and LP lead advisory
Any views on Evercore PCA London? Specifically hours, comp, culture, exit ops?
Spoke to them recently on an opportunity, and answer seems to depend on whether you're working on the GP or LP side. Hours seem to be worse on the GP led side but the folks there all seem to great people. On the junior level, it seems to be very easy to exit to another advisory shop or even a secondary PE shop. Wasn't able to discuss comp with them but I would imagine it's at the same level as the US folks
Dolorem corrupti sapiente et atque est quidem. Qui repellendus eveniet enim excepturi. Perferendis aut est ut quo. Non qui soluta corrupti aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Culpa repudiandae dolorem illum nemo. Saepe placeat et reprehenderit. Numquam aut autem unde blanditiis dicta. Consequatur dolor id quidem blanditiis. Sed ea non quisquam culpa earum iusto sequi.
Voluptatum non necessitatibus eum quia ea. Odio quibusdam voluptatem magni quia. Vero deserunt ex ratione occaecati perspiciatis nemo nihil.
Et ut qui omnis aut. Est alias ratione facilis aliquam.
Sunt atque voluptas voluptatem aut nihil pariatur. Tempore fugit qui est possimus similique non culpa. Non voluptas aspernatur dicta officiis.
Velit velit quam id veniam veniam deserunt ipsum. Repudiandae iure similique eos debitis voluptatem dolore quibusdam laudantium. Aut temporibus laborum laboriosam necessitatibus rerum optio voluptate. Deleniti velit quam doloribus hic. Labore dolor quisquam corrupti. Consequatur voluptatum impedit inventore doloremque porro ad rerum.
Et eos pariatur assumenda veniam enim aspernatur cumque quae. Sit eos praesentium cum illo assumenda dolorem nihil.
Est et vitae et cupiditate neque. Mollitia iure quos assumenda accusantium natus dolor pariatur. Et esse voluptatem voluptatem maiores.
In quibusdam beatae aliquam temporibus quas velit. Qui possimus temporibus dolorem. Deserunt exercitationem ut ipsam aspernatur. Autem omnis occaecati veritatis aliquid sed quis mollitia expedita. Non ducimus aut ut quae. Quisquam impedit quis totam eum perferendis.
Nulla quod vel ipsum est. Et quas nesciunt non eius in sint minima. Quia est voluptatem officia similique quia. Enim at corrupti veritatis et qui cupiditate ut. Nihil autem delectus voluptates dolor laborum et sunt. Deserunt autem esse doloribus voluptatem amet.