How in the hell did things get so bad in Venezuela?

So for anyone who hasn't heard of the situation in Venezuela, basically everyone is dying of starvation because of the lack of... well, everything. Literally, everyone -- infants are facing the possibility of dying so early because of starvation or illness (or a combination) and no one is able to do anything about it. Farms have been completely run down by robbers who are starving and trying to find something to survive off of. Children who are not dead are beginning to develop discolored hair and possible stunted growth, which many suspect will have a lasting effect on the current generation in Venezuela. Hopefully, this will not be the case. But if it happens I wouldn't be surprised.

Now, my bigger questions are,

  1. How in the hell did things even manage to escalate? I remember reading about ridiculous hyperinflation in Venezuela a few years back but I always thought things would calm down once politicians over there got their shit together. Then, I remember reading that Venezuela got hit with a tariff by the US (which seemed really bizarre to me at the time). You'd think after shit goes down that hard that the higher-ups would try to... improve the situation? Amazing how dictatorships play out.
  2. Why are people still defending Maduro? I guess that question is more rhetorical than anything since the police officers in the article basically spell it out... A little upsetting to know what fear can do to you, especially when you're dying (along with your fellow citizens) because of a dictator.

I hope things get better in Venezuela. I'm surprised these events aren't making the front pages of some news sites as often as I think they should, at least.

If you all don't know what's currently going on, I suggest giving the two articles a read! Not a totally full synopsis of the situation of course, but I feel like it is sufficient to make the point clear that the situation is at a critical point.

Of course, I am also not a historian nor have I been following current events in Venezuela with an intense focus so varying opinions on the situation are always welcome! I'd love to learn more about the situation from different perspectives.

 

More like immoral on paper and ineffective in practice. The number one mistake when arguing against socialism is saying that "it's a great idea, it just hasn't worked yet." No. It is immoral to steal from people even if you vote to steal from people.

 

Beat me to it. I would have just put the first word.

Lol @ Liberal cucks throwing monkey shit for being anti-socialist.

It's like "yeah, this one thing has accounted for more deaths and more poverty than literally anything else ever in the history of humanity... That's bad."

"No CNN told me it was gewd!!!." QQ

EDIT: Just want to add for posterity that this was meant to be satirical... Guy unironically acts like mega-liberal. Other guy (me) ironically acts like mega-alt-right.

 

IIRC Maduro has like an 80% disapproval rating right now (hopefully I remembered it correctly) so it's a little amazing to me that even that small smidgen of people are still sticking around with this government.

... I mean you'd think his call to rewrite the Venezuelan constitution around the time his term was going to end was any signal for the police to abandon ship but I guess not.

 

Oil prices tanked and government policies fucked them. The influential people who support him haven't turned yet, but there are a few cracks. I've been reading some good stuff on it and actual talked with a guy whose wife's family lives in Venezuala. It's bad there.

 

It's really disturbing to see how fast an idiot like Maduro can obliterate an otherwise sound society in such a short period of time. Hopefully Venezuela manages to recover! I just hope the dictatorship doesn't somehow manage to advance into anything crazier... Although perhaps not since the Venezuelans seem like they'll just tear him apart the moment he tries to pull anything aha. So surreal. Hopefully all will go well for them.

 
<span itemprop=name>Appley</span>:
It's really disturbing to see how fast an idiot like Maduro can obliterate an otherwise sound society in such a short period of time.

I'm not upset at you at all, but this sentiment--that Maduro is responsible for the collapse in Venezuela--drives me absolutely crazy because it is a common theme among the newly enhanced opposition movement in Venezuela. It was just in 2013 that Maduro won election--he was ELECTED to the presidency in what most would consider relatively free elections.

The sentiment that Maduro is responsible basically exonerates Hugo Chavez from his role. The reality is, Hugo Chavez is the chief villain responsible for the destruction of the Venezuelan nation, but something like half of the opposition in Venezuela is former Chavez supporters who basically blame Maduro for his incompetence rather than Chavez for his policies. But as I laid out, most of the reason for economic collapse in Venezuela is related to Hugo Chavez' policies of nationalizations, which destroyed private industry in Venezuela and turned Venezuela into a rogue, petro state incapable of taking care of itself. Maduro is just too arrogant to reverse course, instead doubling down on Chavez policies.

Array
 
Best Response

What happened in Venezuela is the truest form of socialism. In defense of North America and Europe's "socialists", what they are is really "social democrats" who believe in a large welfare state financed through market capitalism. Venezuela's Chavistas, on the other hand, are true socialists (bordering on communists). Over the last 2 decades the state nationalized nearly all major industries in Venezuela, including most farms. The Venezuelan state, however, is run by utterly incompetent human beings, so those state industries' production collapsed under gross incompetence and corruption, leaving Venezuela a petro-state that imported virtually everything and financed those imports off of vast oil wealth.

When the price of oil collapsed several years ago (thanks, in part, to American fracking technology), the Venezuelan economy collapsed. The cash shortage in Venezuela has gotten so bad that the state oil company's oil production is starting to grind to a halt, meaning that one of the most oil rich countries on earth is now starting to import oil!!! But since there is no source of revenue to the country, Venezuela has had to tap its cash reserves. As of a few months ago, they had $10 billion left and were on a pace to run out of money completely within a year.

Since Venezuela has nationalized most private industry and confiscated foreign assets, no foreign government (other than Cuba) is willing to offer any kind of investment or assistance in Venezuela. Like every banana republic does to survive when low on cash, it starts to print money. With the printing press on and an economy in collapse, the value of the Bolivar has collapsed, creating hyper inflation in a period of economic depression. In order to limit inflation, the government has put in price controls, which necessarily create supply shortages.

In other words, the Chavistas in Venezuela violated every law of economics (price controls, violations of the rule of law, state control of industries, turning on the printing press) and were able to get away with it while oil prices were very high. Then the laws of economics caught up with them like they do with everyone. The lesson here is that you can't legislate away the law of supply and demand--the law is as immutable as is gravity.

Array
 

This was a really informative synopsis! I've been wondering for a while how things managed to reach such a critical point in Venezuela. I've read that there are mixed opinions on Chavez because he supposedly "brought" great times to Venezuela, but it seems like it was all a hoax hiding behind oil prices. I remember when the hyperinflation started happening in Venezuela and I read that there was a 500% inflation going on or something to that effect -- which seemed so utterly surreal to me at the time that it was almost difficult to believe. I thought the numbers were being grossly overestimated but it was only recently when I started following what's been going on in Venezuela again that the 500% is a lot more believable and digestible now.

Very sad to hear about what's happened to Venezuela.

 

Let me create a little word diagram because I think this is an important economic lesson:

Nationalize private industry ----> state-run industry unable to efficiently produce goods and services ---> country imports goods and services that can no longer be sufficiently produced domestically, including food -----> sole source of revenue suffers global price collapse ----> with no private industry remaining, national revenue collapses, causing a cash shortage -----> turn on the printing press to pay bills, including for foreign imports and state wages ------> create hyper inflation ----> to stem inflation, enact price controls, causing even more severe supply shortages and starvation.

Maduro, being a raging, uneducated ignoramus, committed every mistake that every banana republic dictator makes when facing economic hardship. And like most dictators, Maduro is too proud--too arrogant--to admit he made a mistake, so he'd rather his people starve to death than to accept foreign aid or modify policies. He'd literally rather die at the hands of an angry mob than admit he made mistakes.

Array
 

The average Venezuelan lost 20 lbs due to food shortages. Factoring in per capita income, a pound of raw beef would be like us Americans paying $350/lb.

I always joke with girls who aren't in tip top shape that I'll exile them to Caracas for a month- all expenses paid. So far, no takers. I'll keep you posted.

 

Despite the shortages of essential goods, widespread malnourishment, deteriorating public systems - all caused by abysmal economic mismanagement - people are too scared to do anything about it.

Maduro has the military in his pocket. And the military has discovered that it can profit from the chaos. Maduro understands this, and probably allows it to happen in order to keep the soldiers on his side.
Read this to get a better understanding: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/11/14/venezuela-a-failing-state

 

Wow some of the descriptions of what's going on is disturbing. It's almost like it's something you'd only see in a history textbook... though no doubt that the history behind these events are definitely making their way into one! Horrific. The articles I posted didn't talk about the crime scene as much as this one, thanks for sharing.

 
<span itemprop=name>AndyLouis</span>:

so sad, have some Venezuelan friends (many moved to Buenos Aires) and have heard some of the crazy stories (one of my best friends was kidnapped TWICE), sounds like such a beautiful country AND people that i've met are so nice.

About right, my family friend that I mentioned above had 2 of his daughters kidnapped (fortunately both survived), and that's when he got his kids out. Kidnapping of members of the wealthy class was quite common. Their first daughter to be kidnapped convinced the kidnappers that she had money at her house, and when they arrived at their walled house, the family security guards killed the kidnappers. The second daughter they had to pay a ransom on, and it dragged out in a way that the dad said "All kids of my kids are out of the country now!". They were lucky enough to have American connections and the money to escape...that isn't the case for most.

 

Well, by living in South American, I can tell for sure that the collapse of the entirely continent is due to socialists politics.

Brazil, now, has more than 14 million people unemployed, thanks to Lula and Dilma. Argentina, now, is founding its path with the good politics of Macri, but they were a mess before. Venezuela was the state responsible for funding the socialist's movements across south america.

The worst part of all is that here, in Brazil, the media (Bernie Sanders left wing kind), the media doesn't report all the situation as it is. The government is failling to condemn the situation (a bunch of left wings parties, as PT, PSOL, etc., actually, support the Bolivarian government of Venezuela).

 
<span itemprop=name>Hannnibal</span>:

The worst part of all is that here, in Brazil, the media (Bernie Sanders left wing kind), the media doesn't report all the situation as it is. The government is failling to condemn the situation (a bunch of left wings parties, as PT, PSOL, etc., actually, support the Bolivarian government of Venezuela).

Omg seriously? I feel like it'd be one thing if American or European media pulled that crap since they're largely isolated from the ugliness of socialism but Brazil's practically neighboring almost all of the countries making up South America. That's pretty dangerously dishonest of the media to do that... especially when some of socialism's ugly side has shown itself on the continent already.

 

To be fair, most of this media coverage here in Brazil was bought and paid for by the same of rogue leftists in Venezuela, now the music has stopped. As Hannnibal mentioned, a lot of the parties here still support Venezuela's regime, repeting all kinds of nonsense such as that's a CIA plot or whatever.

Fortunately the countries in the region seem to be leaning away from these policies (for now;this will never go away in LatAm).

Venezuela is a textbook case of what not do to when running a country. One of the wealthiest countries in the region, with vast oil resources, and people are hijacking garbage trucks to try and find food. The oil production is stagnant because the engineers and capable employees of the national oil company were sacked and replaced with regime loyalists. Chavez nationalized all the moving parts of the economy - Any idiot could see how this would end, but with oil prices sky high he could maintain his show.Needless to mention, corruption is rampant as in all socialist regimes - Brazilian political consultants currently in jail for corruption crimes confessed that Maduro and Chavez paid them millions of dollars in cash, all through overpriced public works contracts.Wealthy Venezuelans fly to Miami or Panama (A lot of middle-class professionals are now scrubbing toilets there), and the poor ones cross the border into Brazil.

Chavez claimed he was targeted by a "CIA Cancer Weapon". Maduro claims that he talks with Chavez'ghost incarnated into a bird. You can imagine the rest.

 
<span itemprop=name>Hannnibal</span>:

Argentina, now, is founding its path with the good politics of Macri, but they were a mess before.

If it weren't for Macri we would be very close to becoming the new Venezuela I might add.

The worst part is that people keep voting these left-wing governments with the hope of ending the so called "American Imperialism". They haven't realized that the continent has been failing with the same policies over and over. I guess some people never learn.

 

Beeing very honest, I don't see any solution to Brazil. I believe that the country will fall apart anytime. Things are crazy right here, just take a look at the muderers/100,000 from Brazil...

Well, yesterday we had a bunch of leftist Lula's puppets breaking everything in Brasilia...

As an old professor of Monetary Economics used to say to us in class: "best retirement politics for brazilians is a good passport".

 

What really pisses me off, is seeing Americans and Europeans defending socialists politics... For someone who leaves in a very socialist country, it sounds craziness...

 

What if America delivered freedom to Venezuela in exchange for oil? More economical, tbh

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
 

Communism doesn't work.

It kills any motive for the individual to improve his life. Equal opportunities never meant forced equality.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/14/world/americas/venezuela-collapse-an…

^this is the shit that pisses me off - 2,000 word expose by the NYT titled 'How Venezuela Stumbled to the Brink of Collapse' and the article doesn't use the word socialism / communism (or any other variant thereof) even once.

GTFO with your fighting fake news bullshit.

Life's is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
 

I didnt read all the comments, but i can assure you the problems started before maduro got into power. low oil exacerbated the speed of things, things were corrupt with Chavez, only difference was oil was higher so they could afford all of the social welfare programs (which kept the votes coming in for him). Its by no means a "this oil rich company is falling to pieces over a matter of years, its much more complicated than that, Gasoline was heavily subsides (i believe less than 15 cents a gallon) and now electricity is rationed, there was a time the government didnt work on fridays (to save electricity) and many other strange things.

ive had friends' businesses be seized by the government, houses taken by the government (if you cant produce the actual deed to your home it can be confiscated), its a terrible reality that 30 million people have to call "life".

my 2 cents

 

To your point about property confiscation, I wonder what happens if/when a new non-socialist government comes back into power. How do they compensate people for their stolen land/business/factory? And by the time there is a new government, the state itself won't have any cash to pay restitution. But without making restitution to property owners nobody will ever lend to (or invest in) Venezuela. It's like the Chavistas have permanently destroyed the Venezuelan state no matter who is in power. I have no idea how the country could possibly recover.

Ya know, the great irony about the Chavistas' hatred of the United States is that it will probably lead to the dollarization of the Venezuelan economy!

Array
 

What is wrong with an AK-47? They are fairly reliable and if you take the time to zero they can be pretty accurate.

Really, what you need to look for in a 7.62 play is the FN SCAR. Ambidextrous with the familiarity of an AR platform make operating this hogs tooth spitter a breeze. Really is the best 'bang' for your buck. Faster magazine changes than the M14 and AK-47, always a plus in the modern battlefield. Also, with a collapsable and folding buttstock it helps when jumping into the fight. The piston driven system makes cleaning easier by preventing excessive carbon build up in the upper receiver.

Only two sources I trust, Glenn Beck and singing woodland creatures.
 

I agree with pretty much everything @Dances with Dachshunds" said. Capitalism needs a bit of socialism to work (to keep the poor masses from revolt), these countries seem to have it the other way around where they think socialism with a bit of capitalism works. Regarding learning from their lessons, don't we see the same exact thing with France? They keep believing their woes are due to immigration and the EU not their overly socialist policies. It's hard to get the plebs to understand free stuff ain't really free. Additionally, their vice president is an international drug trafficker with terrorist ties, how the fuck did that happen lmao.

p.s. South America is a case study on how to squander vast resources through socialism and corruption. At least the prominent African countries have war/ growing pains from imperialism & tribalism to blame for their fuck ups ( for example Nigeria has to deal with a 50/50 Muslim and Christian population fractured by 100s of tribal languages and just became independent in like 1960)

Array
 

Well, sort of. Just to use your example, France might not be the smartest kid in the block (their absurdly high taxes and archaic labor laws are an example), but believe me they're far from being "socialist" in the sense we experimented here in the region. I get it that many people here climb walls and grab their guns waiting for a soviet invasion when they hear "state funded healthcare" but this is not even close to disaster. Also, in these societies I believe they know (maybe accept?) that these things are not "free", most people understand they're trading maybe a safety net for high taxes.

In Venezuela, that's not even the case, they chose insanity as a government strategy.

BTW their vice president was chosen based on 50% loyalty to the regime, 30% skills in embezzling public cash and 20% just to spite the US, because he is a criminal and a terrorist.

 

I feel horrible for the people in Venezuela. I lived there in the early 2000s (2001-2003), as a Mormon Missionary. Being a missionary, we got to meet with all types of individuals and families of differing socioeconomic classes, and really see how people were living. Being a 19-20-something kid from the US, it was eye opening. They were not a third world country at the time, they were just poorly managed (and coming from someone raised in Louisiana, that is saying a lot).

How did Venezuela get to this point? I have a few ideas:

1) Let’s start with the brain drain. If you are smart, and had opportunities to leave the country, you take them. It is no different from young people in Louisiana moving to Texas, kids in the NE moving to NYC, or folks in states close to California eventually moving to CA. You go where the opportunities are, and in Venezuela, they were not creating opportunities, if anything they were killing them by not being friendlier to International Business. Therefore, you have the smart and talented people leaving.

2) Political unrest leads to economic uncertainty. Are you going to buy a home to live in if that home is located next to a meth lab, and concert venue? No, that would give you a negative ROI, and you would be up all night with breaking bad and breaking Benjamin. That is Venezuela. Chavez was the head of the movement, and Maduro was his bedside bitch, but those men got to power first by the sword, and then the pen and all of did with it by making promises to the poor and uneducated. Their markets could not take what the government was doing, and that threw the Bollivare (Venezuelan currency) out of whack. During my time in Venezuela, the day that Chavez was exiled from the country, the Bollivare went from 900:1 dollar, to 2500:1 dollar. When he came back two days later, it changed again to 3500:1. The political unrest and uncertainty of its future has killed that country.

3) Oil prices dropping kills the economy. There are three things that Venezuela produces: Miss. Universe winners, Baseball players, and oil (...I would say heat too, but they have the Andes). Two of those things the government can legally package and sell. The problem is, nobody is buying oil. Sure people are buying oil, but two years ago, a bucket of chicken from KFC cost more than a barrel of oil. Oil prices being, as low as they are and the government not reinvest and diversifying oil money into other resources when oil was at its peak has killed the country. If oil prices do not bounce back, Venezuela will have to look into human trafficking beautiful women, and people with amazing slugging percentages to make ends meet.

4) Kind of goes back to #2, but how are you going to protest when you don't have any food? When I was in Venezuela, the government went into Pepsi's regional bottling plant and took control of the whole thing. They did this with several US based companies, because fuck the US, we are Venezuela, and this is how we send messages. It was a complete shit show. I recall them taking over some oil rigs in Lake Maracaibo, and they spilled so much oil, that it would have made BP blush. But the government didn't just want to send a message to US based companies, they wanted to send a message to anyone with means, so they started clamping down on store owners, bakeries, and the damn farmers sending our necessary resources to make food...I think the only company that hasn't been hit is Polar (the country's favorite beer company). However, with fewer people producing food, that means longer lines, and more black markets. When I was in Venezuela I remember people from Columbia coming over to buy food because resources were scare in their country, now it is the complete opposite, Venezuelans are crossing over to Colombia to get food and drugs.

Until they can fix those four things, Venezuela will continue to be a mess. However, the thing is, to fix those four things they only need to get elected officials who are not as queer as a $3 bill.

 

I have lived in Venezuela many years and still go there to see relative and friends once every two year for couple of weeks and the press tend to always exaggerate the situation. It's like in Venezuela you can't go outside your home or gangsters will cut you in small pieces or in Venezuela everyone is dying as if it were Somalia. It is true to say that the country chaotic, dysfunctional, suffers from shortage and big security problems but portraying the country as a new Somalia is not accurate.

Recently the situation has gotten worse and worse but none of the people I know there do suffer from starvation - and I don't know only well-off people, but also "normal" people. I'm not saying the story of the WSJ is a lie, I'm just saying, that you can't extrapolate and say that everyone is basically dying like it's the Horn of Africa. Recently I have read similar stories about Greece explaining the poorest people couldn't feed their kids properly or afford basic medical treatment but it does not make Greece a new Darfour.

Just an example of how the press can get sensational and dramatic. The last time I went (last year) everyone was saying in the press that you basically couldn't find any toilet paper or shampoo and that people were queuing everywhere to desperately get some. Needless to say I was wondering how I would manage this before going so I packed a massive amount of tissues. There was some truth to it in that when you went to the shop you had just one or two brands of shampoo/toilet paper but to my relief I never struggled to find some (and the price was far from extortionate). Unfortunately saying "in Venezuela right now you don't get a huge choice of toilet paper brands" does not sell as much as saying "People are desperately queueing to find anything to wipe their asses".

Also saying that people are defending Maduro because of fear is just not knowing the country. Maduro is not popular and people are not afraid to say it. Venezuela is NOT North Korea. If you switch on the local TV most of the channels are highly critical of the government and probably more so than even the NYT is tough on Trump. I communicate with my relatives through Facebook and no one is afraid to post publicly posts that are openly against the government or even calling for revolt. Now there is a segment of the population that still supports Maduro because you have to understand that for decades the poor felt completely left out and during 20 years of Chavist government someone was at last talking to them and spending money on their ghettos, schools etc. Even though now they are caught in chaos like everyone else they might not forget that so easily.

Now back to the "why" the country fell into chaos.

The country has almost no industry other than oil. While the oil prices were high Chavez used the dollars accumulated to increase social spending. It did yield some results because the poorer part of the population got access to some healthcare and education. The main issue is that no one developed other areas of the economy. So you were in a situation where Venezuelans were importing basically EVERYTHING they were using. Once the oil boom ended the imbalances just got unleashed and Venezuelans woke up with no other sector to support their economy and government spending.

Apart from that there is a lot of corruption that I have seen myself so it's likely that some of the money actually harvested by the government is not spent as it should be and is therefore wasted, making the crisis much worse.

Lastly the elites and middle class/upper middle class are partly to blame because, while they criticize the major imbalances of the economy, they used them to make tons of money from any loopholes they could find (and due to some bizarre things such as the dual exchange rates put in place by the government it was very easy to find loopholes).

One quick example: The fact that you had two exchanges rates would mean you could get up to something like $3000 (I don't remember the exact amount) at a discounted government rate in bolivars. Everyone who had the means to do it would basically pay for the dollars at the (insanely) discounted rate and go to neighbouring Panama to buy stuff and resell the goods at the black market dollar rates. Basically you could get 3000$ for almost nothing and sell the goods at the "market driven" rate at a much higher prices. This was not only individual behaviours- at a higher level local businesses would resort to the same tricks. For example, some airlines (not the government owned one Conviasa obviously) would ask the government dollars for imports at the discount rate, and sell the tickets at the blackmarket rate. The consequence is that it drains dollars out of the country's vault and worsen the local prices distortion. I've also seen that when travelling to Argentina a couple of years ago when they still had the fixed rate policy that I think they ditched in the meantime, the only difference being that Argentina has a more diverse economy and a labor force which is more educated so it can more easily cope with a messy exchange rate while Venezuela can't.

Also there is such a high inflation rate that it's really tempting to store your goods and wait for prices to go up... which in turn makes the inflation worse.

 

To what extent would you say the original WSJ article was accurate in capturing what you've seen in Venezuela? You mentioned that there may be a little bit of sensationalism to sell the story, but at the same time I would imagine that poverty and mass starvation could easily run rampant due to the effects of hyperinflation in the Venezuelans' lives. I'm just curious to get a gauge of the actual scene happening in Venezuela (again I'm a total outsider to the entire affair so everything I know has been from this thread and news articles).

Were some upper-class Venezuelans totally exploiting the imbalances on a large scale or was it just a passing activity some of them would do (like in your examples)? How often did individuals and local businesses do this? Or was it pretty scandalous if anyone actually did it in the first place (making it largely discouraged by the masses)?

You mention that the poor felt like they were having their voices heard by Chavez. What was the wealth disparity like in Venezuela leading up to Chavez's rise (if you know anything on it)?

 
Appley:
To what extent would you say the original WSJ article was accurate in capturing what you've seen in Venezuela? You mentioned that there may be a little bit of sensationalism to sell the story, but at the same time I would imagine that poverty and mass starvation could easily run rampant due to the effects of hyperinflation in the Venezuelans' lives. I'm just curious to get a gauge of the actual scene happening in Venezuela (again I'm a total outsider to the entire affair so everything I know has been from this thread and news articles).

Were some upper-class Venezuelans totally exploiting the imbalances on a large scale or was it just a passing activity some of them would do (like in your examples)? How often did individuals and local businesses do this? Or was it pretty scandalous if anyone actually did it in the first place (making it largely discouraged by the masses)?

You mention that the poor felt like they were having their voices heard by Chavez. What was the wealth disparity like in Venezuela leading up to Chavez's rise (if you know anything on it)?

Hello,

If you want to get a gauge of what life is there at the moment from the testimonies I get, life is clearly not "normal" right now. There are shortages and it's harder to find some basic necessities which is why I wouldn't be surprised that some parts of the population actually suffer from hunger. But we are not (yet ?) at a stage that looks like some African or Asian countries.

Honestly my feeling is that imbalances were massively exploited. When I was there you would not find a single phone sold at the discounted imports exchange rate while the government gave licenses for businesses to import foreign goods at an extremely advantageous exchange rate. So it meant people were imported at reduced rates and pocketing the difference on a lot of goods. This extremely advantageous exchange rate is by the way probably one of the root cause because it equates to an imports subvention while if they had managed their dollars in a better way, they might be in a better shape today. There has long been talks of changing the exchange rate and making the discounted official rate less advantageous and closer to the black market rate but the government had delayed action on this because they feared to antagonize the population. I remember that they changed it recently but it was too late.

It was not only the companies that were doing this. To be honest one day I was invited at a bar by army guys who were lavishly spending on luxury stuff that they certainly could not afford with their salaries (they were colonels etc but the bill was so high that I was shocked even as a foreigner).

It was not really scandalous although each side was criticizing the other. The government blaming the private sector and the private sector blaming the "boliburguesia" (people like those army guys who benefited from state monies, apparently).

As for your last point yes the wealth disparity was being reduced. For example the FAO noted a reduction in... undernourishment (but their last data is from 2015 so now the trend might have reversed).

Chavez actually came to power largely because the Venezuelan population was angry with its elites and was suffering a lot from poverty and economic chaos as many other Latin American countries did in the 90s. The problem is that they did not make that improvement sustainable because they did not diversify the economy. I don't remember the exact proportion of imports that were oil related but it's something truly massive. Some policies could have helped. For example, ditching the dual exchange rate or at least making it less attractive would have helped retain some dollars in the central bank and would have improved the coutry's competitiveness. And that's one of the many things that they should have fixed before the situation got out of hand.

 
dostoievski:
The country has almost no industry other than oil. While the oil prices were high Chavez used the dollars accumulated to increase social spending. It did yield some results because the poorer part of the population got access to some healthcare and education. The main issue is that no one developed other areas of the economy. So you were in a situation where Venezuelans were importing basically EVERYTHING they were using. Once the oil boom ended the imbalances just got unleashed and Venezuelans woke up with no other sector to support their economy and government spending.

This is a very misleading bit of information here. You make is sound like Venezuela just so happens to be a petro state. The reality is, the Chavistas destroyed Venezuelan industry through nationalizations and through running quality people out of the country with violations of the rule of law. Let's not pretend like Venezuela just, unfortunately, happened to be a not particularly diverse economy.

dostoievski:
Lastly the elites and middle class/upper middle class are partly to blame because, while they criticize the major imbalances of the economy, they used them to make tons of money from any loopholes they could find (and due to some bizarre things such as the dual exchange rates put in place by the government it was very easy to find loopholes).

I mean, you can't really just believe what you just said. This is about the most misleading piece of information you put forth. The "elites" who have access to the below-market exchange rates are highly ranked Chavistas--people well connected to the Chavez (now Maduro) government.

dostoievski:
One quick example: The fact that you had two exchanges rates would mean you could get up to something like $3000 (I don't remember the exact amount) at a discounted government rate in bolivars. Everyone who had the means to do it would basically pay for the dollars at the (insanely) discounted rate and go to neighbouring Panama to buy stuff and resell the goods at the black market dollar rates. Basically you could get 3000$ for almost nothing and sell the goods at the "market driven" rate at a much higher prices.

This was not only individual behaviours- at a higher level local businesses would resort to the same tricks. For example, some airlines (not the government owned one Conviasa obviously) would ask the government dollars for imports at the discount rate, and sell the tickets at the blackmarket rate.

This example completely contradicts your position that there aren't chronic shortages. There is no black market without supply shortages.

dostoievski:
Also there is such a high inflation rate that it's really tempting to store your goods and wait for prices to go up... which in turn makes the inflation worse.

All tied to the Chavistas' policies of destroying private industry, oil prices tanking, and then being forced to print money to pay for government services. The worst inflation rate in the world doesn't just happen.

And oh by the way, when Venezuela runs out of money in about a year you can expect many, many people to die.

Array
 

It's a typical politician story. A politician comes in, starts feeding into a divide, and chooses a side to further deepen the divide. Spreads hatred in the country by making each side emotionally angry at the other. Leverages this emotional hatred for his own power by being aggressive on the other side. Reaches the top, and then pretends to kill off the side he "was against". Really doesn't and keeps them around so that when problems arise, he can blame the other side, so his people keep staying mad at the other side, and not at him. Once he's at the top he runs a socialist government to keep his power up and blames his people's problems (which he created) on his enemy ("capitalist pigs" is the term he uses I believe. At least we can eat bacon tho).

Political Divide is the way to get into power. Do you really think Democrats are scared about Donald Trump? No, they fucking rejoiced when he was elected because this was the way for new Congress members to launch into the political spotlight. They just have to start hurling out insults at Trump, and they become powerful. Hell, even comedians On the flip side, do you think Republicans actually care that Hilary Clinton used a private e-mail server? No, they don't they just want to get their supporters so enraged, so that they can promise "change", and keep their power. Fuck Politics. Just a group of people who are good at nothing but winning popularity contests.

The good thing is that the United States doesn't allow these dumbasses to actually do anything catastrophic. The Fed is separate and the Judicial System is actually quite spectacular. It's like letting a baby steer the steering wheel, with the engine turned off and the car in the drive way. With politicians being the baby and the country the car. But with Venezuela, it's like they dropped a baby 5 times, and then let him fly a fucking Boeing 747.

 

I hope I can bring some perspective to this discussion as I am from Venezuela and my whole family still lives there. Although much has been said about how Venezuela got to where it is now, the most crucial part of the country's demise has been omitted, separation of powers. You could sit here and discuss socialism vs capitalism all day long and you will never reach a conclusion because each side can articulate valid points. However, a point in which we can all agree is that an effective democracy needs separation of powers. When the executive branch gets complete autonomy over who manages the other branches of government they loose any type of accountability. No system regardless of its political inclinations can function without accountability, that why even corporations have a board of directors. Back to the point, after the executive branch was able to seize the other branches of government they where able to establish mechanisms to first protect their power at any expense (killing people, imprisoning political enemies, etc, etc), second debilitate the private sector, and enrich themselves at the expense of the country . Add to this the most incompetent mismanagement of the public sector in the history of humanity and you have an unsustainable economic model. It lasted so much because it coincided with one of the largest oil booms in history but now that the tide has fallen it has become apparent to their support base that they were swimming naked.

 

You're right that lack of separation of powers is a huge problem in Venezuela, but it's insufficient in itself. The vast majority of countries globally lack sufficient separation of powers and yet do not suffer from Earth's worst inflation and an absolutely destructive depression. At its core, true socialism--something most countries lack the fortitude to enact, even among socialist parties--is what destroyed Venezuela.

EDIT: Let me just add that actually living in Venezuela does not make someone anymore aware of their country's failure than anyone else. The reality is, people like me saw this coming 10+ years out and the Venezuelan people voted for Maduro as recently as 2013. I hate to say it, but the Venezuelan people are collective morons and know nothing about everything...

Array
 

You cannot compare the lack of separation of powers in other countries to what happens in Venezuela. I mean this is a place where you pick your cousin to your cabinet and nobody blinks. Also, I do agree that extreme left policies like the ones applied in Venezuela are not efficient/ destructive; however, what really killed the economy was the lack of accountability, that is beyond debate. I get what you are saying and when it comes to economic/ political inclinations I lean right, but you cannot blame what happened to Venezuela to socialism because it wasn't the ideology what caused the problem.

 

Dolorem sunt et architecto delectus. Molestias quis velit a aut qui dolores minima provident. Rem qui accusantium inventore facilis modi non quas. Perspiciatis debitis dignissimos nulla ut incidunt itaque.

Dignissimos qui delectus sint. Nihil praesentium incidunt unde qui laboriosam eveniet. Alias molestias est tempore et et molestiae explicabo architecto. Vero pariatur aut quisquam consequuntur. Sequi amet labore aperiam magni. Omnis perspiciatis sint in voluptas vero. Nemo officiis consequatur tempore soluta magni perferendis.

Maiores id dicta similique earum ullam repellat voluptatibus. Est omnis corporis tenetur at rem. Dolores aut reprehenderit voluptatem soluta tenetur aliquam ea. Earum blanditiis cupiditate culpa alias inventore omnis sit.

"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers
 

Debitis qui maiores consequatur enim modi sunt ratione. Reprehenderit veniam quaerat dolores repellendus. Molestias explicabo maiores fugit doloremque. Aliquid neque corrupti itaque enim.

Ea cum nesciunt molestias quo. Ea cumque accusantium ipsum vel. Et rem ipsa alias numquam ipsam ratione et.

Est voluptates magnam velit non aperiam quo. Totam minus quaerat nemo nisi consequuntur rerum. Velit porro atque fuga magni repellat magni. Omnis inventore nihil eligendi nulla consectetur praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”