" IS A TARGET SCHOOL THAT IMPORTANT"

I am a high schooler( always wanted to become an Investor) targeting to get into AM/HF(no interest in IB/PE) and ultimately become a PM. After going through Linkedn ( fidelity ,blackrock,vangaurd,pimco) I found most analyst ,PM were not from top targets.only 1 out of 3 were from H/W/S/Y/P/MIT/OXBRIDGE type . Ohers were from semi or non targets. In AM/HF industry is school more important or how much knowledge you have and how much alpha you can generate .If you have in depth knowledge ,skill, read hundreds of investing books you can easily trump the Harvard guy with no such skill but just the brand name.

11 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It dosnt matter, the market is going to crash from the coronavirus, just buy puts.

Buying tesla weeklies is literally free money.
 
"vishesh9101"

If you have in depth knowledge ,skill, read hundreds of investing books you can easily trump the Harvard guy with no such skill but just the brand name.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/l0HlvtIPzPdt2usKs/giphy.gif" alt="yikes" />

 

The reason these places recruit so heavily from target schools/from target jobs (IB or PE roles) is because they’re looking for star candidates. There are PLENTY of intelligent people in finance, just like there are PLENTY of stupid people in finance. They just raise their chances of getting the intelligent people by going places that people have proven to be intelligent (top schools demand top talent, top banks demand top talent). Also, they don’t care how many books you’ve read. If their livelihood depends on it (in hedge funds for example, you often get bonuses based on how your whole TEAM does, not just from your own hypotheses) then they want people with proven results, not people who have read how to do it.

If you’re serious about getting a top job, go to a place where they are explicitly looking for people. I promise you won’t get in to ANY job if headhunters don’t even recognize who you are, especially jobs dominated by ex-bankers. You can make up for discrepancies like this with networking, but it makes everything 100x harder for you.

 

commenting because it’s possible OP is serious, but this survivorship bias- judging decisions and actions, etc. on those who rose to the top. you (OP) are LIKELY not one who is capable of going to top targets and getting scholarships (or else this wouldn’t even be a question). Instead, you have low pedigree and want to know whether the odds are stacked against you. If you were smart enough to become a top PM, the answer would be clear to you but it’s as simple as the above commented says: it’s all about ‘ease’ and and making things good for you. If you love to invest, that’s correlated but not exactly the same as being correct, because all this pedigree and historical success helps whether bad times. if you’re banking on the fact that you’ve read books, well people are gonna give money to who have done the same and are better than you in every aspect. so if you can and want to maximize success, you don’t go shooting your self in the foot. being a private wealth manager or running your own fund is different than being employed in a prestigious hedge fund as a portfolio manager focusing on specific sectors, etc. and strategies. hopefully I’ve helped change your perspective a little bit and you came off a bit arrogant in your post (assuming this isn’t a troll post and you are just a little bit dumb no offense).

 

Accusantium labore nam maxime temporibus eligendi dolores veniam. Sunt unde ut optio quia doloremque quis dolore. Veniam omnis officiis aperiam qui.

Qui rerum magnam possimus voluptatibus dolore. Expedita dignissimos omnis cupiditate voluptas. Reprehenderit velit totam aut dolore.

Expedita maiores et est ea. Illo omnis quam ea non voluptatibus natus. Et perspiciatis veniam neque repellat quae.

Minima dolore quia sed voluptates excepturi quia esse. Ut ipsum odio eum est. Cumque aut dolore repudiandae rerum quidem eius velit. Dolores eligendi ducimus et suscipit. Aliquid et sit a. Unde est sed molestias aspernatur itaque sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”