46 Comments
 

Cant imagine this is comfortable for them though - especially if net long. Lot of analysts probably feeling heat, given poor performance from last year as well.

 

wonder how they hedge their privates. cuz those privates definitely wont be getting the same valuations they were marked at 6 months ago

 

I’ve said this many times on many posts but many HFs are not around “to make money. Period”. They care about many other metrics in addition to return (and to be clear return is important). Many funds actually target a specific amount of risk and a specific amount of return, as opposed to “make as much as possible”. Clients know this when they invest and expect this over time. So you would expect many funds to be up this month regardless of the s&p (and this is true for some funds that I know of). 

 

No, because you are lumping all funds into equities. If you are speaking just of equity funds that run net long then sure. Alpha isn’t measured as return vs s&p. Just think of a multi asset funds that invest in bonds, FX, etc. there are many “flavors” of hedge funds and you are speaking about one subset and even then making sweeping generalities. 

 

Me watching this debate as I’m aping into some shitcoins and minting a JPEG that some insta influencer will shill to the masses

 

After reading this whole thing, it’s absolutely amazing to see the mental gymnastics public investors use to try and argue that they aren’t usually losing their clients’ money at the end of the day.

 
Most Helpful

No mental gymnastics required. Fund tells investors what return, risk, and other relevant metrics they can expect over time. In general (almost always), these should be better than the s&p and other passive investment options, I.e. mix of stocks and bonds, etc (key word over time not always point in time or in a given year). Investors decide if they want to allocate to that, if they believe in it, and of course periodically reassess to see if fund is actually doing what they say. 

If you run a portfolio that is net long and is meant to track the s&p (and outperform) then you aren’t doing your job if you aren’t outperforming (over time). 

But in general it is how I describe it. Lots of funds don’t do well and don’t survive. The ones that do, end up hogging up all the AUM (and those are the ones you keep hearing about and keep printing double digit returns no matter what year). 

 

Stay in banking... clearly investing is not for you. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Shit is messy in the public equities world. Rotation, positioning, or whatever you want to call it is fucking everything up for discretionary equity books. Tough when popular HF longs are being liquidated constantly. And for the pods with the shorts, ouch. Lots of damage control given the size of the moves and the timing of it which only exacerbates things further of course. 

 

Natus et maiores modi ut recusandae iusto. Ullam eveniet assumenda fugit mollitia molestias.

Sit repellat nostrum dolores deleniti et consequuntur sed. Magni aperiam dolorum numquam quam dolorem.

Est voluptas inventore eos minus sed consectetur. Similique ut fuga voluptatem architecto reiciendis possimus. Laboriosam illum impedit ex molestiae exercitationem ullam maxime. Qui dolores consequatur occaecati magnam.

Minus eligendi repudiandae magnam debitis eaque. Quia aut consectetur tenetur asperiores in magni porro. Maiores laboriosam magni voluptatum in modi placeat numquam. Est vel quibusdam provident dolor. Deleniti consectetur ipsa velit iusto quis quo qui.

 

Harum accusamus voluptas aut praesentium quam at molestias. Facere qui quo unde occaecati aut enim ea. Nisi perspiciatis amet ut minus eligendi animi magnam. Aut laborum harum eius deleniti rerum fugit.

Omnis distinctio id eius nobis cumque at sequi suscipit. Aut incidunt sit voluptatum voluptatem consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”