How To Be A GREAT Analyst

Incoming at a SM HF (very built-out, well-known fund mentioned on this forum) from undergrad (HYPSM), did well in a bunch of pitch comps, but truly want to know what separates a good from a great analyst. I feel like I miss out on some underlying ideas, or frankly, have the "picture upside down". I try to develop a contrarian investment mindset, looking for the perfect opportunities of great businesses that might be misunderstood, and like everyone else, looking for strong compounders. 

I recently listened to Dan Sundheim, and the way he breaks down companies into 3 major drivers so clearly across all sorts of industries is ridiculous. How can I build this intuition or is it just through reps/reading 10ks, books/creating PnL builds?

24 Comments
 

To become a great analyst, especially at a well-known SM HF, you need to focus on a combination of technical skills, critical thinking, and relationship-building. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some actionable steps to elevate your game:

1. Master the Fundamentals

  • Accounting and Financial Statement Analysis: These are non-negotiable. You need to be able to dissect financials and understand the story they tell. Solid modeling skills are also critical.
  • Scenario Analysis: Build models that reflect both bullish and bearish outcomes. Understand how different assumptions and multiples impact valuation. For example, if a company loses its competitive advantage, how does that affect its P/E or P/B ratios?
  • PnL Builds: Practice creating detailed PnL models across industries. This will help you identify key drivers and develop intuition for what matters most in different sectors.

2. Develop a Contrarian Mindset

  • Healthy Skepticism: As highlighted in WSO threads, skepticism is a key skill. Question management's narratives, dig into what they might be downplaying, and critically assess sell-side reports to identify inefficiencies or mispricings.
  • Catalysts: Remember, an undervalued company without a catalyst will stay undervalued. Always ask, "What will bring the price to my target?"

3. Refine Your Investment Process

  • Break Down Companies into Drivers: Like Dan Sundheim, focus on the three major drivers of a business. This could include revenue growth, margin expansion, and capital allocation. Practice simplifying complex businesses into these core components.
  • Deep Dives: Read 10-Ks, earnings call transcripts, and industry reports. Focus on management's consistency, execution, and alignment with shareholder value creation.
  • Historical Context: Analyze how multiples and key metrics have evolved over time and connect these changes to identifiable company or industry shifts.

4. Build Intuition Through Reps

  • Repetition: The more companies you analyze, the better your intuition will become. Start with industries you’re passionate about and expand from there.
  • Books: Read classics like The Intelligent Investor, Security Analysis, and Margin of Safety. These will help you understand the principles of value investing and margin of safety.
  • Observation and Practice: Refine your understanding by observing patterns, testing hypotheses, and learning from mistakes.

5. Hone Your People Skills

  • Relationship Building: Don’t treat management meetings as pure Q&A sessions. Build rapport, understand their strategic thinking, and provide valuable insights on market perception.
  • Selling Ideas: As one WSO contributor noted, being able to sell your ideas is just as important as having good ones. Tailor your pitch to your audience and learn to communicate your thesis succinctly.

6. Take Ownership and Think Like an Investor

  • Big Picture Thinking: Step back from the minutiae and ask, "Why does this matter?" Pretend you’re presenting your work to a client or PM.
  • Gut Instincts: Over time, you’ll develop a feel for when something doesn’t add up. Trust your instincts but back them up with data.

7. Leverage Resources and Mentors

  • Learn from Seniors: Study the best analysts at your fund. Observe how they approach problems, ask questions, and structure their work.
  • Use Existing Materials: Don’t reinvent the wheel. Leverage old models, reports, and insights from your team.

By combining these technical, analytical, and interpersonal skills, you’ll position yourself to not just be a good analyst, but a great one. Keep refining your process, stay curious, and never stop learning.

Sources: Q&A: 2nd Year MM IB Analyst, Underrated Skill in Investing, Finishing 1st Year as HF Analyst - Ask Anything, Vent Some Wisdom to Incoming Analysts/Interns

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Druckenmiller said this recently and it's 100% true: ditch the impulse of being contrarian. Focus on being right, and be pragmatic about it. 80% of the time, the crowd is actually right.

It feels amazing when you are right and everyone else is wrong, but "forcing" those situations leads to bad decisions and a world of pain.

You get paid to make money, not to look smarter than everyone else.

 

For sure, makes sense. I try not to be a complete contrarian investor since there's probably a reason those companies are trading so cheaply. Still, I am trying to rationalize and think more critically about drawdowns, since I like looking at companies that dropped 50% after earnings (Centene Corp), or situations like SaaS (NOW, ADBE) where the underlying asset is still valuable in the next 2-3 years but shares were driven down by narratives or some sort of idiosyncratic factor 

Will try to listen to druckenmiller whenever i get the chance too

 

Well it's simply a DCF for those companies you mentioned. The terminal value (biggest driver of the DCF) of those companies got decimated because of recent AI implications, so yes a big part of it is the narrative. Sure ADBE can make a ton of cash flow in the next few years, but today the market isn't certain ADBE will be around in 20 years...

 

I can’t stand when kids coming into in this industry feel the need to point out what their “accomplishments” are to validate themselves I guess?


Everyone in this industry went to HYPSM, did well at pitch comps, did MF PE, and whatever else. That’s how we all got here, You aren’t special anymore, so get rid of that mindset and stop telling me about stuff that doesn’t matter.

 

Why does it bother you so much? It's a 21 year old that is brand new to the industry (and the real world), and trying to understand how they can perform better. They're probably just trying to make it clear that they're open to self-improvement and willing to put in work, and those "credentials" are all they have to point to (because, again, they're 21). Rather than ranting and raving at the kids on your lawn, you'd probably have a bigger impact if you actually combined some real advice on the actual question with some genuine feedback on why the instinct for self-credentializing may backfire in the field.

To OP, unfortunately I'm not in the HF world so don't have any useful content to add on your actual question, but I can't stand when people attack what appear to be perfectly well-intentioned young people trying to learn more for no real reason.

 

Yeah thanks, man I appreciate it. I only said those to show I'm willing to learn and put in the work, as you said. I really enjoy investing/equities, can't really take my mind off of it, and whenever I'm free, I love to just dive in and read/listen to stuff. Obviously, everyone in the industry is super smart + strong pedigree, but that's why I feel the need to try and separate myself since credentials really only get you into the door/considered for a seat in the first place.

 

Chiming in as I would be joining an industrials pod, but frankly don't know what to expect... Team seems to be very reliant on data/numbers, and I believe I would be a data/model monkey (I appreciate the opportunity loads so no gripes at all). So just want to know how to be an excellent one to offload work from the team.

 

Don't think I will have to initiate coverage or pitch any ideas for a while. Just updating data/models fast and accurately from the convos I had with the team - slightly different from my past experience as I haven't work with institutional L/S models etc. and not sure how to be a fast and effective worker aside from just being hard working.

So would appreciate any insights from anyone!

 

i think i was specifically referencing ILTB, but I have listened to both, and he still explains things very well

 

Most businesses have one thing - one competitive dynamic that everything else flows from. Before I touched a model I'd ask: if I owned this entire business and could only track one metric for the next three years, what would it be? And it can't be revenue or EBITDA...it needs to be the leading indicator that tells you whether the thesis is intact or broken.

On primary research, the reason it matters isn't the information. It's that a 30-minute call with a customer or competitor forces you to translate your thesis into plain English and defend it out loud to someone who has no idea what a DCF is ("explain this to me like a 12 year old" is my internal test or something I ask every analyst). If you can't do that clearly, your model is just a precise version of a fuzzy idea. I've changed my view on businesses completely in the first call, not because I got new data, but because I realized I didn't really understand the business yet. The model should come after that, not before.

The Sundheim thing comes with reps. And be honest with yourself about why you were wrong. Most young analysts are so concerned about getting a name in the portfolio that they ignore that part.

 

Is fundamental edge worth buying and going through before doing a summer in publics? How does it compare to peak frameworks' course if any of you are familiar? Thanks.

 

Non asperiores ipsa modi delectus. Perferendis blanditiis modi ut numquam. Error quis quia eius deserunt itaque harum. Est quam consequatur error ducimus sint aliquam voluptates voluptate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”