Marshall Wace?
Anyone have info on this fund? Have seen many people going there and everyone says it's a fantastic firm. Someone on another thread said it's a 1 PM per sector model, looser risk limits etc.
How does Marshall work? I see so many people on linkedin with a PM title there - how can there only be 1 PM per sector? Is it a sub-PM structure?
Do they run market neutral? What size book are we talking (how much for sub-PM) and much is main PM overseeing? Do sub-PMs still get LDD % of PnL and PM's get 20%?
They’ve hired many PMs to replicate the pod model internally. This is separate from their Eureka fund where they operate more “SM style”.
Heard that initiative has gone absolutely terribly so I’m surprised they’re still hiring.
what is difference between the pod model they're doing internally and eureka? In which of those 2 do they give people large books / lower payouts / looser limits?
On the latter, is it like a $5bn+ book, run a low net, and get 10% payout instead of 20%?
Eureka is big book / not mkt neutral. Pod model is small book (not sure if mkt neutral). Dunno any other details apart from fact that it’s on its way to being shut down. Pod guys definitely not even 1bn book size. few hundred million.
Used to work at MW, now at a pod. This is just incorrect. MW is ~60% systematic and the other 40% is fundamental. The fundamental side is the Eureka book and the systematic side is TOPS. There is really no “SM” style anymore, it’s all quasi-pods. I guess some truth to newer PM’s being all over the place but that’s typically how it goes. Returns have been strong over the past 5 years. Very smart ppl at that fund and growing AUM rapidly
That’s definitely not accurate, you probably left some time ago. In the past 18 months, they’ve rolled out a new program to replicate pod-style setups by hiring PMs from other multi-strats, with smaller books. That’s led to a noticeable influx of very junior PMs with little real experience. From what I’ve heard, the platform has been consistently loss-making so far. The big PMs are still there, so there's a wide range in quality of PMs there
On l/s equity sidr MW has 2 - 3 very good PMs who've been there for a while
And then a lot of PMs they've hired promoted in recent years with mixed track records to say the least
And on all of them there's the quant/AC/central book that takes the real economics
The simplified math is
1B book "neutral" but you can tilt a lot
Try to make HSD - realistically you're getting DD or neg DD
LSD payout net after everything
Not neutral, but broadly what you said is true, while some books are significantly larger
Our L/S healthcare book manages $2.5B with 3-4x leverage depending on the quarter. Less than 12 analysts total, split 50/50 biotech and else. Other sectors vary pretty wildly such that no generalizations will really count for much. No PM/pod is only running a few hundred million though, unless you are completely discounting leverage.
Commentary about tenured PMs doing well and new hires not doing so well is accurate. Commentary about the fundamental strategy “winding down” is total bollocks. Yes the Eureka strat gets all the guns and glory for good reason but let’s just say they’re not exactly doing it totally alone anymore. We’re not AQR quantamentals by any means, but there is some cross-collaboration.
Culture is fantastic and there is a very real focus not to get wrapped up in the full-on MM pod structure, as that would defeat the purpose of having our talent stay with us. Risk model is not as rigid. We’re similar to Holocene in this respect. Can’t speak for new hires that much but the core of my junior team has been here for 4+ years. We get all of our meals comped btw which doesn’t help the waistline but whatever.
Great place overall, I’m never going back to pods if I can avoid it. Won’t speak to PnL structure as I don’t feel like disclosing.
Wanna talk about the Emerging Managers Programme?
Thanks for sharing! Not asking about specific PnL structure / payout structure, but do you guys target the same 3-5% return (est 4% annualized vol x 1 sharpe), or is the annualized vol higher on average at MW? Assuming you guys don’t run as tight as the platforms?
When you say “our HC pod manages $2.5bn with 3-4x leverage”, is that $2.5bn of MW AUM x 3.5x leverage = HC pod managing $8.75bn of gross? Or is you’re saying $2.5bn of gross (in-line with typical scaled book at tier 1 platform)?
Does “our” that imply there’s only 1 main HC team at MW, or are you saying 1 of the larger HC books runs $2.5bn? Someone had brought up there’s 1 team per sector, that’s just the case in eureka right? How many teams per sector typically, and are they all running >$1bn of GMV?
Last question: is the setup the same as most other platforms ie analyst / senior analyst or sub PM / PM?
Does the firm hire hc analysts without advanced science degrees? I found a few people on LinkedIn with MDs/PhD, but does this apply to everyone on the team?
Thank you so much!
Hi bro, how is their elevate programme? Have got an offer for the same? Any comments would be helpful.
Most of the new PMs are managing only a few hundred million at most, with many having already been let go. That’s distinct from the core Eureka PMs, who continue to run multi-billion dollar books.
Thanks for the feedback
Funds don’t disclose who the PM is before their garden leave is over and they’re in the seat already for the exact reason so that grifters like you don’t try to annoyingly contact them directly for a job before they even start. (And because non-compete violations are very expensive.) Talk to BD or HH for instructions, don’t be that guy.
One of the largest L/S funds in Europe, very smart people working there.
Quasi pod structure with looser risk parameters. Heard majority of AUM is in systematic but AUM / head is still solid on fundamental side
The FS fund manager there (Indian guy) manages more than $10b
the guy that's spinning out with mlp backing?
No. RN was global thematics, AR financials and VS heathcare.
How good is their quant business?
What is the culture really like / is it a good place for junior analysts in L/S equity?
Do your research they literally pioneered the pod model…first place to actually understand and use factors to their advantage. “Quantamental” originated at Marshall wace.
It’s very hit or miss for juniors, a mix of average teams and the rare standout ones. The culture is fairly laid-back, which some people like, and one of the main draws is that you’re allowed to take outsized risks
Anyone familiar with their macro business?
very brainrapey
meaning?
Which HH do they use? Or best to go direct to their HR
interested as well - did u manage to get in touch?
Any thoughts on recent PM turnover? There have been several news articles about long tenured PMs leaving for multi-managers over the past year. Not sure if it’s as simple as collecting big guarantees or if there are other reasons.
Which tenured PMs are leaving?
Pretty academic culture. Objectively an exceptional place. Well resourced, smart people, strong rep. Some talent management missteps in the past years where they've lost good people, but that's industry standard.
Main (relative) drawback is P&L economics. High base but P&L attribution below market compared to platforms. So if you're a strong P&L producer, the math is more lucrative elsewhere. Well known that the founder's critical about the talent war and what he views as "compensation inflation" across the industry.
Quibusdam rem et ea voluptas autem. Tenetur adipisci sed quis voluptatibus quia. Molestiae nostrum nostrum et in sit totam sit.
Tempore non illum animi nam. Et et similique deleniti. Repellat mollitia voluptatum corporis ut reiciendis. Expedita consequuntur et perferendis ut distinctio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Enim facere qui cum enim ratione dolor. Nesciunt eius et deleniti asperiores et odio. Iure nesciunt doloremque porro quis neque corporis.
Debitis facere eum delectus. Sit iure cumque minus cumque eum. Eum provident sapiente ut et sunt ea. Sed eaque corrupti rem asperiores assumenda vel. Magnam aut odit qui nulla. Minus rerum autem praesentium suscipit.
Consectetur libero autem ut qui ea esse cum quos. Corrupti facilis commodi voluptatem sint qui. Rerum id ut sunt necessitatibus eum. Magni quisquam et facere eius temporibus. Quod quam eaque omnis labore rerum quia. Totam ex et culpa nobis sit. Necessitatibus omnis autem dicta et minus et voluptatem. Error dolores omnis et fugiat amet.
Deserunt eum repudiandae ut soluta modi quis reprehenderit. In quisquam qui aliquam praesentium et. Ipsum sunt debitis ut tenetur eligendi. Maiores ut dolor quod iure quam temporibus sunt beatae.