3.3 GPA, Engineer, Non-Target

Hello,

I recently graduated from a non-target school with a chemical engineer major and a 3.3 GPA, and I'm deciding whether to leave my GPA on my resume or not. I know there are similar forums out there, but I found them to be founded 4-5 years ago; thus, I feel they are outdated. I've had an engineering internship and a investment banking internship at a small boutique bank. I know with my credentials I could get a position at a less prominent MM or local boutique investment bank, but I am specifically targeting prominent MMs or elite boutiques.

I had two interviews with HR from top MMs from networking and I thought they went very, answering all the technical questions correctly, but the recruiter told me the next step involved an associate mainly screening based on resumes; thus, I feel like I was not invited back for a second round based on my low GPA.

Any advice would be much appreciated. Thank you!

4 Comments
 

Now I don't have much experience with this as I am only now a rising senior but if I could add my two cents, i think that a 3.3 is decent enough especially with an engineering degree. May be a little tougher competing with kids with stellar GPAs that for sure, I'm in the same boat looking for FT for next year. But I think you should leave it on until you have more experience because soon that will be the most important part of your resume. Also you never know what could have not gotten you the interview, since you got it, you know you're qualified, it could have been someone else had a stronger connection or interviewed just a little bit better. Don't be discouraged, it's a numbers game.

 

I'm a 2nd year at a BB, I'd say leave it on. I can't speak for all groups, but my group will screen out sub 3.5's unless it's a hard science degree.

If we see that you didnt include it, we assume that's worse than a 3.3 and you risk getting your shit just thrown in the trash. A 3.3 in an engineering degree will almost definitely get a second look though.

 

Vel optio voluptatem enim sed commodi corporis quibusdam. Temporibus dolores est sint et qui. Sequi assumenda minus tempore est consequatur sit quae eius.

Et deserunt consectetur sunt quisquam eum sint. Repudiandae nobis est sit culpa cum voluptates libero. Sint ipsum ea dolor.

Facilis reiciendis iste dolore velit molestiae hic inventore. Ex placeat nihil illo sapiente incidunt.

Eligendi iure inventore architecto animi. Odit voluptate explicabo libero sequi et. Ipsa officia quia iste amet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”