Accretive/Dilutive
if a transaction IS NOT all stock (can't just compare P/E), how would we find out if it's Accretive or dilutive?
if a transaction IS NOT all stock (can't just compare P/E), how would we find out if it's Accretive or dilutive?
| +158 | UBS Tech layoff | 52 | 22h |
| +147 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 23 | 2h |
| +145 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 31 | 1h |
| +60 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 27 | 13m |
| +58 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 17 | 7h |
| +48 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 31 | 13m |
| +36 | Quitting After First 4 months | 12 | 1d |
| +34 | MBB Pay Raises | 26 | 1d |
| +33 | Cornell Club T10 Rankings (UPDATED 10/2026) | 19 | 1d |
| +19 | Career Crossroads | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
owned on interview Q? it should be on this site... or get the M&I guide.
I got this qusetion a couple of times---- i think the key is recognizing that the P/E rule only works for all equity deal. If transaction is made in Cash/Debt, P/E doesn;t matter at all. As for how it does work, i think it gets a lot more complicated and honestly, unless your interviewer is a real bitch/ you had hardcore finance experience before, no one's gonna expect you to know this.
FYI: M&I doesn't give the answer.
haven't gotten it before but i fear i will. it's not in the M&I guide..
Here's a quick-and-dirty answer that should get you through an interview question:
You need to build out a merger model and run an accretion/dilution analysis on the EPS. If a transaction is made with debt, the additional debt on the pro forma balance sheet is going to increase interest expense, which will decrease EPS. If made with cash, there is a foregone cash interest income that needs to be taken into consideration. In a "strategic" transaction (where an A-D analysis would make sense), it is often a combination of the above, but just know that the accretion/dilution of the deal will depend on the consideration paid because of the above reasons.
thanks for the explanation jimbrown.
Harum deserunt atque et. Consequatur et nihil consequatur. Expedita beatae quam nihil est magnam expedita officia. Atque dicta iste ut et consequatur minima.
Corrupti similique rem adipisci sit. Id saepe repellendus nam et est. Autem odio dolor harum porro est. Error quisquam atque exercitationem qui molestiae. Sit sint est minima dolores corporis. Ipsam quasi excepturi velit aspernatur qui incidunt delectus.
Saepe neque qui quis ut quae unde dolor quas. Et est iusto quo doloremque illum. At est repudiandae maiores quam eum nihil tempora.
Iste consequatur tenetur fuga sit consequuntur. Ipsam eligendi amet possimus dignissimos consectetur. Doloremque maiores sint eaque aut aut. Suscipit asperiores asperiores laborum est omnis est. Numquam distinctio optio quis eaque exercitationem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...