Boutiques move away from M&A

Listening to the earning calls of Evercore, PJT, and Houlihan Lokey, analysts were very focused on non-M&A revenue. It seems that Evercore's large beat over estimates is mainly due to non-M&A fees while PJT strategy advisory will be down compared to Park Hill and Rx. 

Is this interest in fee generation due to cyclicality (where we are in the cycle and the focus will return to M&A shortly) or does this represent a structural change in how independent advisory banks are run? 

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

This is completely expected. M&A activity is highly cyclical, and public companies and their shareholders want to reduce the cyclical nature of the companies. Hence they diversify into other activities that help reduce overall business cyclicity to ensure earnings are more stable. Same reason why you see a lot of IB firms moving down-market and chasing MM deals more and more, as large-cap M&A activity tends to be more cyclical than MM M&A activity.

As I understand it, a big reason why Effron wanted CVP to remain private was so CVP wouldn't face this pressure to diversify and could focus on what they're good at (being good M&A and strategic advisors to their long-time clients).

 

Yup, and CVP peeps have remained busy with deal work/strategic advisory even as the rest of the M&A market slows down.

 

Et quo eum soluta placeat quae vel. Dicta et id aut ab velit et cumque. Laborum corrupti aliquid provident quasi ea sed est.

Ut culpa odio distinctio. Velit nesciunt accusantium voluptatum sit. Voluptatibus quam natus assumenda possimus rerum perspiciatis voluptate. In pariatur sit quia corrupti quod. Perspiciatis quos alias qui dolores exercitationem est.

Culpa dolores ut quos nemo impedit quibusdam. Ipsa ullam voluptatibus voluptas ullam eos. Est ipsum reprehenderit sed quam. Explicabo consequatur reprehenderit eos est praesentium et. Eaque incidunt quaerat illum enim vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”