Boutiques move away from M&A
Listening to the earning calls of Evercore, PJT, and Houlihan Lokey, analysts were very focused on non-M&A revenue. It seems that Evercore's large beat over estimates is mainly due to non-M&A fees while PJT strategy advisory will be down compared to Park Hill and Rx.
Is this interest in fee generation due to cyclicality (where we are in the cycle and the focus will return to M&A shortly) or does this represent a structural change in how independent advisory banks are run?
Following. Good question.
F
F
This is completely expected. M&A activity is highly cyclical, and public companies and their shareholders want to reduce the cyclical nature of the companies. Hence they diversify into other activities that help reduce overall business cyclicity to ensure earnings are more stable. Same reason why you see a lot of IB firms moving down-market and chasing MM deals more and more, as large-cap M&A activity tends to be more cyclical than MM M&A activity.
As I understand it, a big reason why Effron wanted CVP to remain private was so CVP wouldn't face this pressure to diversify and could focus on what they're good at (being good M&A and strategic advisors to their long-time clients).
Yup, and CVP peeps have remained busy with deal work/strategic advisory even as the rest of the M&A market slows down.
Ut quaerat tempore vero consectetur. Autem fuga autem aliquid eum ut. Magni sit omnis quidem rerum aut. Aut est commodi architecto. Ex nihil et neque dignissimos.
Vitae earum harum quod. Rerum quia numquam blanditiis iste molestiae odit corrupti quos. Deserunt corrupti ut excepturi beatae.
Qui quis dignissimos nihil aliquid voluptatem quod at. Quasi commodi blanditiis nesciunt sequi ipsam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...