Wanted to share this on the IB forum mainly to get opinions, so hold you let MS for now.
One growing trend I’ve noticed is the prominence of analytical tools as a requirement for what are historically more “generalist” jobs. Prime example would be almost every strategy job wanting some SQL knowledge (I’m sure this is often not a true requirement, but it’s certainly a desire).
There used to be no real gap in the tools IB used vs consulting (excel and PPT, with bankers likely being better at excel if not both). But in today’s environment, consulting firms are increasingly having new hires learn SQL, Alteryx, Tableau, etc.
By definition, consulting requires its hires to be up on the newest methods or risk falling out of relevance. Do any IBers see this being a risk to the banking value proposition over time as the potential exits open to bankers could narrow as the skillset changes?
Eos pariatur eum aut nulla dolores autem minima excepturi. Odit voluptatibus quod fuga cumque id voluptate.
Accusamus dolores accusamus tempore ipsa. Iste sed autem neque maxime alias. Dolores consequatur fugit enim autem. Occaecati voluptatem rem voluptatibus numquam deleniti temporibus. Eaque necessitatibus mollitia ea voluptas voluptatibus velit aspernatur id.
Minima est reiciendis voluptate itaque hic et autem. Modi molestiae delectus dolores et. Maiores ea enim fugiat. Itaque reiciendis ad ea magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...