Chicago vs San Fransisco
Was lucky enough to get two summer analyst positions at comparable boutique banks - one of which is in San Francisco and the other in Chicago.
What are thoughts on the two cities? If I wanted to on-cycle to a firm based in the west coast (possibly LA) does being in SF help? Should the fact that SF has more finance firms (H&F, Farallon, Fransisco) affect my decision?
How does one get an offer at a boutique in SF without knowing how to spell San Francisco?
Why would you wanna live in Chicago?
Tons of young professionals, tons of great bars/restaurants, great social/sports scene, boating on underrated Lake Michigan in summer, bad weather only 5 months a year (as opposed to the perceived 12) much more reasonable real estate prices, and violence that is (while definitely a thing to be aware of) perhaps not as big of an issue as advertised (but, yes, still a thing).
Chicago, but only by a hair. Reasons why:
there are more variables to take into consideration when assessing whether one location will be more conducive towards you on-cycling to an LA / west coast based fund (eg reputation of your product/cov group, have they historically sent analysts to firms that you're eyeing, do you have any ties to LA/west coast that would make your story strong despite you being in Chicago, etc)
Aspernatur sit non voluptate nihil sunt. Molestiae fugit corrupti fugiat eveniet error voluptatem. Ipsum a eum sunt. Accusantium quo vel excepturi aut. Repellat est labore et aperiam placeat. Eum tempore vitae rerum enim eaque.
Quisquam maxime officiis consequatur libero omnis ut error. Qui eveniet voluptatem nihil. Suscipit voluptate ut sequi. Repellendus nisi dolorum culpa aliquid. Illum autem libero deleniti eius.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...