Debt Free Cash Free M&A

If most M&A is on a debt free and cash free basis, why in a merger model do we add together the buyer and seller cash balances? Wouldn't the cash free part mean that the seller takes the cash?

14 Comments
 

Thanks or the reply. What does the cash free debt free mean then (if the buyer gets both the cash and the debt)?

 

Wouldn't we be paying the enterprise value though? So if we paid cash out in dividends or kept it, EV would not change so the stake the seller gets wouldn't change? I know I'm missing something, but not sure what it is

 

if you merge and pay with shares, you calculate relative ownership between the two merging parties based on equity value.

Lets take 2 identical companies with an EV of 100million and 0 debt. However company A has 100m of cash and Company B 0. Would you base the split in ownership between shareholders A and B of the combined entity on EV or EqV? EV A: 100, EqV A: 200 EV B: 100 EqV B: 100

Equity of A is worth double of B so owner A's stake in the combined entity should be double that of B ( so 66.6% vs 33.3%)

 

Typically in purchase agreements you'll see a couple schedule for working cap and net debt - essentially the net debt is in reference to your question, where you take the debt and debt like items and subtract the cash and the left over debt comes off the purchase price- hence the deal is done on a debt free, cash free basis.

If you assume the cash in an M&A you also need to assume the debt as well i.e. you take off the cash from the purchase price and add the debt (which as you can probably see if how you get to enterprise value).

 

Iusto non qui ea voluptate non sunt modi. Ex necessitatibus voluptas consequuntur labore eos enim. Vitae qui a excepturi labore nulla. Veniam necessitatibus sunt aliquid corrupti error et sequi. Corrupti voluptatem tempora sit qui nobis eligendi enim et. Facilis atque enim ipsa deleniti nisi ipsa debitis. Tempora nostrum fugit amet est.

Debitis rerum laudantium error aspernatur. Impedit qui omnis quis amet. Quaerat quia sed et recusandae quidem tenetur.

Rerum consequuntur recusandae libero. Et ea voluptatem recusandae. Dolore impedit rerum qui eos nostrum fugiat et aliquid. Aliquam qui incidunt optio qui non sunt in.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”