Debt Free Cash Free M&A
If most M&A is on a debt free and cash free basis, why in a merger model do we add together the buyer and seller cash balances? Wouldn't the cash free part mean that the seller takes the cash?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +404 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 62 | 59m |
| +98 | UBS IB Americas has failed, now behind Santander and Stiffel | 27 | 1h |
| +79 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 41 | 8m |
| +60 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 11 | 4h |
| +48 | Losing my personality in Banking | 9 | 1d |
| +45 | The good and bad with Wells Fargo | 12 | 3h |
| +42 | Associate & Above IB exits | 18 | 6h |
| +35 | Sent my Claude prompt to 200+ Teams chat. MD wants to see me Monday. | 18 | 8h |
| +33 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 13 | 3h |
| +31 | Tech to IB Pivot | 20 | 17h |
Career Resources
I think you mean funding side? In a share exchange (i.e., stock for stock deal), the buyer still buys all the assets of the target including cash and assumes all liabilities including debt. They just do it by paying in shares.
Thanks or the reply. What does the cash free debt free mean then (if the buyer gets both the cash and the debt)?
Means they’re funding the deal w shares.
Can also be a strategic move: if you keep more cash in the entity, you will get a bigger stake in the combination. Cash can also be payed out before deal if that's preferred.
Wouldn't we be paying the enterprise value though? So if we paid cash out in dividends or kept it, EV would not change so the stake the seller gets wouldn't change? I know I'm missing something, but not sure what it is
if you merge and pay with shares, you calculate relative ownership between the two merging parties based on equity value.
Lets take 2 identical companies with an EV of 100million and 0 debt. However company A has 100m of cash and Company B 0. Would you base the split in ownership between shareholders A and B of the combined entity on EV or EqV? EV A: 100, EqV A: 200 EV B: 100 EqV B: 100
Equity of A is worth double of B so owner A's stake in the combined entity should be double that of B ( so 66.6% vs 33.3%)
Typically in purchase agreements you'll see a couple schedule for working cap and net debt - essentially the net debt is in reference to your question, where you take the debt and debt like items and subtract the cash and the left over debt comes off the purchase price- hence the deal is done on a debt free, cash free basis.
If you assume the cash in an M&A you also need to assume the debt as well i.e. you take off the cash from the purchase price and add the debt (which as you can probably see if how you get to enterprise value).
Ah okay, so if we assume a cash-free, debt-free basis, then we would not be adding together our cash balances?
You don't merge on a cash and debt free basis. "Seller"has no proceeds except shares in the combination so there is no money to repay debt-holders.
Enim beatae fugit corporis dolor unde ratione voluptatem ut. Culpa et qui eveniet repellat vel veritatis deleniti architecto. Officiis accusamus nam et sed. Ut cum perspiciatis atque veritatis.
Qui exercitationem et enim corporis. Culpa asperiores vero non est illo. Quasi quas distinctio incidunt modi nisi unde et. Saepe cum iste nemo facilis tenetur.
Beatae omnis fugit et aut et. Distinctio sunt minima sint distinctio aliquam distinctio ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...