Discount for lack of marketability/liquidity
Hello
I am only a few months away from finishing my MFin and I'm now writing my master thesis. In my thesis I am trying to build a model for estimating illiquidity discounts (liquidity premiums), which I am going to compare to other methods used to quantify this discount. What I am trying to do right now is to get a picture of which methods are most popular among professionals. I have been in contact with some people working in IB and TAS and gotten some opinions from them, but I would like to get some more. Which method do you guys prefer?
The methods I am going to compare are:
- Put option models (Lookback options and average-strike puts)
- Factor models (APT and liquidity adjusted CAPM)
- Empirical models (Restricted stock studies, IPO studies and comparable transactions)
- Synthetic bid-ask spreads
- QMDM
Thank you!
On another note - Wasn't sure which forum to put this in so I went with what seemed like the most popular one.
The preferred method I've seen being used are variants of the put-option models.
I've seen mostly empirical models (PIPE's, etc)
Laborum nulla optio sunt. Itaque labore deserunt laudantium soluta dolor voluptas molestiae. Officiis reprehenderit sed illo nam culpa nostrum.
Quo atque eos totam cum amet et. Repudiandae repellat asperiores rerum animi. Error aut nam ipsa dolores ut voluptatem. Illum commodi qui sed. Ratione qui laudantium sint nam ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...