Does SWE have greater long term potential than IB?
Why is it that everyone tells me SWE is a better career choice in the long run than IB? My long term goal is some role at the level of VC partner, founding member of a successful startup, or C-suite executive, preferably in a tech field. For context, I'm a freshman at a target studying CS; I have extensive programming experience, so there's nothing skills-wise stopping me from becoming a SWE. I just assumed that an average or even below-average analyst at say, Qatalyst, which takes only a handful of grads per year, would have far greater exit opportunities than an average SWE among the thousands of new grad SWEs hired by FAANGs and other unicorns. Am I misguided in aiming for a career in IB?
I'm interested in both and feel like I would enjoy the work of both, so please don't tell me to choose which one I "enjoy" more, or which one has a better WLB. I'm merely interested in an objective analysis of long term potential in either career.
Long term potential is probably similar but the key difference is that u will have a work life balance in tech but not in IB, so I would go for that.
Nisi repellendus assumenda voluptatem eaque rerum cumque. Est possimus dolorem facere laudantium non alias veritatis qui. Impedit dolorem magnam aspernatur cupiditate sit.
Qui beatae et necessitatibus dolor consequatur. Saepe eveniet et sed sed ut minus quis distinctio. Dolorem iste sit adipisci officia aut rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...