Equity Value : Levered Vs Unlevered
Do Levered and Unlevered Free Cash Flow approaches yield the same equity value? If not why the difference arises?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +68 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 22 | 11h |
| +45 | Venezuela Debt Restructuring - LAZ vs CVP | 18 | 7h |
| +45 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 26 | 1h |
| +40 | Background check issue IB Full Time | 23 | 12h |
| +30 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 13 | 3h |
| +27 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 7 | 1d |
| +24 | MM bottom bucket bonus | 9 | 2d |
| +24 | UBS GIG, LevFin, FSG Interns working Sundays and 85 hour weeks their first week? | 12 | 8h |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 2d |
| +20 | What is the standard number of M&A deal reps? | 8 | 3d |
Career Resources
UFCF directly value the enterprise, whereas LFCF directly value the equity. In theory, if you are performing a levered and an unlevered DCF for the same company, you should get the same equity value. That being said, there are many different assumptions and projections that go into the model which can cause a deviation. UFCF gets you enterprise value, you then adjust for non operating assets and liabilities, which gets you to implied equity value.
In theory, yes. In practice, no. The reason they differ in practice is because theoretically you should update your unlevered discount rate to reflect the updated mix of debt vs equity during every discount period, but in practice no one does that.
So the difference is only because of the debt repayment and debt raised (Net change in debt) that changes the D/E ratio which should have been adjusted in the wacc and Ke for getting the discount rate?
More or less. I want to preface this response by reiterating that no one would ever do this. That said, if you really, really wanted to get technical about it, the way that I would conceptualize things is as follows:
- The business that you are evaluating has some overall degree of risk that would be applicable to all stakeholders, which should be the WACC that you use for the unlevered DCF
- Based on the cost of debt and percentage of debt, you would get to an appropriate cost of equity for your levered DCF
- Over time, your debt / equity ratio mix would move because A) your debt would be increasing or declining based on issuances or amortization and B) your equity value would be changing over time (primarily because you are discounting your terminal value over shorter and shorter time periods, but also because you are moving past certain years of cash flows)
- You may notice that this whole thing is circular - as your equity value moves, your % equity changes, which changes your cost of equity %, etc...
- In theory, your WACC and cost of debt could also move over time, depending on what risk free rates are doing, if you are assuming the business derisks, etc...
In practice, no one ever thinks about it this way. When people do unlevered DCFs, they get to an appropriate discount rate and then apply it throughout the entire period, regardless of any assumptions around changing risk free rates or derisked business profiles. When people do levered DCFs, they get to an appropriate cost of equity, and similarly ignore any evolutions to the capital structure over time. Also, often people get to the cost of equity based on an idealized or peer capital structure instead of the actual capital structure in place in the projections.
The reason people don't bother with those rolling updates is because the purpose of all these exercises is not to get to a "true" value, it's to help triangulate around a defensible value. The only time I have ever had to deal with updating capital structures over time was for one fairness committee because a relatively junior person was new on the committee and wanted to show they belonged, so asked us to do it - it was a waste of time and didn't change the answer.
Nihil sed neque quidem amet dolores. Minus veniam quibusdam nemo.
Rerum error doloribus amet. Debitis deleniti non earum nihil. Neque aspernatur quis facilis sint.
Est fuga repellat est voluptates molestiae. Pariatur beatae impedit dolores rerum quo. Voluptatem perferendis error ut tempore sequi ut eaque at. Doloremque magni et pariatur.
Doloremque autem consequatur sunt vel. Molestiae ipsum et harum repudiandae. Voluptas voluptate minus ut sunt quidem. Minus ex veniam odio dolorem qui culpa delectus doloremque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...