Guggenheim Prestige
What’s the general consensus these days around prestige of Guggenheim M&A? Are they considered EB / same level as Moelis, EVR, PJT, etc? Or are they a step lower?
Trending Content
| +137 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 62 | 51s | |
| +56 | Ranking banks that went under | 34 | 1d | |
| +54 | Intern Ettiquette | 14 | 1d | |
| +42 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 31 | 11h | |
| +42 | NEED NY RESTAURANT RECOMMENDATIONS | 25 | 2h | |
| +41 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 23 | 3h | |
| +38 | Would comitting to ATL İB be stupid? Please give feedback. | 21 | 6h | |
| +27 | 2024 new grads who didnt get return offers update | 12 | 1d | |
| +25 | A shitter's comprehensive guide to sophomore year recruiting | 2 | 5h | |
| +23 | PSA to gymcels: focus on the summer internship | 10 | 2h |
Career Resources
Can’t speak on the prestige side as much, but from an outsider’s perspective they are advising on large and mega deals, specifically within HC, tech, and industrials. Have heard that exits are solid as well
Definitely a step lower, I don’t even really consider them an EB tbh but maybe that’s an old position (MS me Gugg interns)
Interesting take. Why aren't they an EB? Is it because of their relatively big size? Judging by the quality of analysts/associates they have they aren't TOO different than some other EBs
-
*Only comparing those students who want to do IB with the ultimate goal of PE/HF. Based off my experience (Wharton), the very top students, I mean geniuses, go straight to megafund analyst positions. Other top students (not very top) get scattered pretty evenly among the EBs (including Gugg) / BBs because the greater importance of diversity and recruiting from a wider variety of undergrad schools make it impossible to predict where someone will end up. Adding in nepotism, it's incorrect to say analysts at one EB/BB are generally better than analysts at another (even GS vs. CS). So to answer your question, yes definitely an EB with great exits
An EB is not defined by the quality of the junior bankers they take. It is defined by prestige, high pay, selectivity, deal size, exits, and league table performance. Guggenheim lacks in several of these categories.
I think people get so caught up with the idea of prestige and don't necessarily think about how those rankings are made. Guggenheim is a fantastic firm, everyone i talked to there loves their team and they advise on some of the coolest deals. If you consolidate the last two decades of deals, its just that places like Goldman, Evercore, Centerview, etc have won so many deals and mandates, and have a different amount of success when you think about it historically and the size/impact of the deals
What does it matter, Gugg pays very well
That's the issue - I've heard Gugg used to pay close to top of the street but is now consistently paying lower than some of these other firms. A friend that works there said they wait to see what other boutiques pay and try to be middle of the pack afterward
Last few years GUGG paid ~10-15% less than CVP, EVR, MOE, PWP at all levels. It is annoying mgmt says we are a top payer but then doesn’t pay like it
We’re a reputable firm and I (personally) love my team and the deals we do together. All of the firms mentioned in this thread are great. I think it’s more important to find the industry / culture / geo fit you desire vs. think about squishy concepts like prestige. I don’t think it matters once you hit the desk - it’s about how you’re spending your life and your time, you know?
What are private equity exits like ?
LinkedIn search shows all the megafunds (KKR, Carlyle, CD&R, Advent, Permira, etc.) and top MMs represented
They're MM, wouldn't consider them “prestigious”
Also depends on the industry. Within Esoterics Structured FInance, they are by far # 1 in that space. They put together financing in sfg for first time asset classes, and for companies. They also know who the investors are, and how to convince them to buy. The modeling and skillset you will get from working here will set you up for life. But the hours are brutal. Can work 80-120 hour weeks when it gets busy, and you're working on challenging stuff. Bonuses are solid, and if you have to cancela vacation for a deal, gugg will cover all expenses related to the cancellation.
120? did not know gugg could get that sweaty
Guggenheim analysts have completely taken over this thread as evidenced by how many SBs comments receive after just an hour. If I were a prospect I would not only tune out this glazing but also reject being with such insecure analysts who want their bank to so desperately be an EB (it is a MM).
As a VP at an EB (EVR/CVP), we do not consider them a competitor or EB but as a middle market. Anyone on the street knows they are a clear step down from the real EBs and delusion will only cause those to say otherwise.
Are EVR/CVP the only EBs then? PJT M&A advises on very few of the large deals and gets carried by the RX practice. Moelis is a volume shop that does mainly MM deals
Quality of analysts relatively even across all the EBs, top BBs (GS / MS), and other BBs. As commenter above mentioned, diversity recruiting (more schools considered and demographics) and nepotism (always been there) at banks have more evenly distributed the top analyst buyside exits between the banks
It's good to know that the reason my VP is so unresponsive and takes so long to turn comments is because he/she's on WSO defining EBs and debating kids over which banks fit this made-up category
Extremely small dick energy coming from a VP.
this guy (i_hate_middle_market_banks) is a troll and has a hard-on for hating on gugg and probably got dumped by a girl at gugg lmao
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/i-hate-my-mba-summer-assoc…
bro was an sa at a bb/eb, not a damn vp haha
Name checks out
Gugg is a great firm - they do well and take a lot of intelligent hires
Generally good exit opps from what I've seen as well over the years
Congrats on Guggenheim!
Yeah have heard overall positive sentiment about the firm since I've started working
Their IT services guys out of Chicago are legit — lots of respect for Gugg
What are their most prestigious groups?
Audit
Disclaimer I work at Gugg. In terms of overall prestige, I think it’s a half step down from traditional “EBs” and a quarter step up from larger MMs (Jeff, Roths).
I define prestige as deal size, pay, exits.
Deal size wise, we are lower than the top players like CVP for sure, but (I could be wrong) I think it’s higher than Moelis (and others?) which are definitely considered EB on this site, but does mostly MM deals from my understanding. This was from dividing total deal volume / #, which isn’t perfect data.
Pay wise, we’ve certainly paid near the top end of the street. Generally in line with Lazard, PWP and Moelis the last few years, but lagging CVP, PJT and EVR. My bonus has been meaningfully higher than peers at Lazard and PWP, but friend at EVR had the same bonus but higher TC due to higher base. Pure anecdotal, so not sure where averages shake out.
Exits are weaker overall, but I would imagine that it’s because top talent goes to EBs rather than Guggenheim and it’s more candidate driven. Doesn’t seem like people have trouble getting looks, but placement is definitely not as strong.
Just to double check, you had the same bonus and rating as your peers? I would be surprised because I feel like LAZ pays a lower bonus vs Guggenheim and PWP pays a higher bonus than Guggenheim if you account for the same bucket rating.
-
To answer your question specifically, I was being conservative with "in-line" as I think it's been higher than both LAZ and PWP on average (less than 5 hard datapoints, so take with a grain of salt). Didn't want to jump to conclusions since my number was likely above average and other datapoints might have been mid bucket.
From the WSO post, it sounds like PWP paid really well this year, but historically it seems like they haven't paid as well.
Any thoughts on the HC Services group?
In terms of prestige? My take is that outside of PE recruiting, people typically look at the firm and don’t know much about specific groups.
In terms of prestige? My take is that outside of PE recruiting, people typically look at the firm and don’t know much about specific groups.
In terms of prestige? My take is that outside of PE recruiting, people typically look at the firm and don’t know much about specific groups.
In terms of prestige? My take is that outside of PE recruiting, people typically look at the firm and don’t know much about specific groups.
This EB debate is pointless. Just as there are different tiers of BBs, there are different tiers of "EBs." For a bank that has advised on some of the largest transactions over the past decade (Disney / Verizon / Pfizer are top of mind) and for its founding to be tied to Bear Stern's advisory practice (Schwartz, Van Lith), Gugg can't be considered a MM bank. It's a lower tier EB behind the names mentioned above just like BofA / Barclays / CS / Citi / DB are a lower tier BB than GS / MS / JPM
Yeah I agree. Overall prestige (within finance) is similar to BoA / Barclays type firm
Their MedTech team had some amazing runs in the late 2010s. Was probably the best boutique bank on the street that covered megadeals in the space and it was rumored that their comp was top of the street. I was hoping to get into a M7 - T15 (ended up at a T25) because I wanted to do banking at the time and Guggenheim stuck out to me as a place I'd want to apply to. Haven't spoken with any of their bankers though since my school's not a target. A lot of the bankers that I saw on LinkedIn pre-MBA also left for corporate exits or other banks by the time I was a first year. Seems like their MedTech team is small and has high attrition.
Always been a solid group. Good on pay, culture and exits
Definitely the museum outranks the company.
Not entirely sure, but you might have better luck asking that NYU student with the podcast
Anyone have insight on tmt there?
its one of gugg's stronger groups. interested in the office in menlo park - can anybody speak to their recent performance and how they're doing?
Does anyone have insights into Guggenheim's London office? And does anyone know how the TMT practice that they are growing with poached Greenhill MDs has performed?
Qui quaerat eum sint quos. Et doloremque qui itaque. Voluptatem est ipsum ut aut aut excepturi velit. Numquam sed veritatis odio voluptatem corporis. Maiores rerum quia sit est recusandae aut quos. Ut aut dolorem aliquid facere qui nisi.
Cupiditate accusamus explicabo qui et tempore aliquam omnis sequi. Cupiditate quia est dignissimos excepturi. Corrupti eligendi praesentium cum ipsum ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Consequuntur ducimus eligendi et ut nam. Veritatis iusto laudantium ducimus fuga fuga. Eius ut illum sit. Molestiae pariatur excepturi quo adipisci laboriosam. Sit magni enim sapiente unde est non veritatis voluptas.
Rerum qui officia voluptas possimus. Voluptatum quos accusamus placeat odio non voluptatem nobis. Ipsum aspernatur quisquam non est. Rem ex accusantium consequatur animi. Dicta quas earum adipisci quia totam. Omnis dolorum praesentium enim illum possimus corrupti velit nam.
Rerum doloribus nihil non quis atque ut dolorum. Soluta debitis ea sunt ut aut. Corporis blanditiis vitae corrupti placeat. Molestiae adipisci doloremque delectus voluptatibus nihil ea distinctio. Quo nobis in repellat quis voluptas expedita vitae debitis. A iure praesentium occaecati sit eaque et. Deleniti tempore quos veniam dolore est rem fuga.
Itaque ipsa laudantium dicta. Sit adipisci aut architecto optio blanditiis eveniet eum quia. Enim adipisci provident asperiores tenetur.