If big banks believe "diversity is our strength" why do some use psychometric tests to ensure they only hire applicants with explicitly similar temperaments and traits?

Always thought that was a little funny

"Hey guys we're going to do diversity recruitment because diverse thought leadership is our greatest strength and what makes us great. Also though, we're going to give everyone a psychometric test and only take candidates that have the exact same psychological temperament as us to make sure there's no actual intellectual diversity. This way we can make sure even the female candidates are Type A Hardos like us that drink the corporate kool-aid!" 

I mean do we want diversity or do we want to explicitly reduce diversity and variability? Or is the distinction that Diversity of skin color is a strength, whereas diversity of thought is a cancer? 

5 Comments
 

Bro banks are companies who give zero shits about diversity or the environment - they purely exist to make money and generate a return for their shareholders. Unfortunately or fortunately for them, certain institutional investors decided to assign ESG scores to every company and moreso refuse to invest into a company who doesn't meet an abritary ESG threshold. Therefore, in keeping with prioritising returns for shareholders, banks upper management realised it would be more cost effective for the bank to introduce diversity quotas to meet these ESG thresholds (involving race and gender quotas, but not personality traits like you described), even if it meant hiring on average poorer quality analysts, as they would lose less money by doing this than if their ESG score was downgraded.

 

Pariatur at labore ipsam et. Non dolores non nisi et ullam. Id eligendi repellendus ut consequatur possimus aperiam iste eligendi. Officiis aliquid molestiae et fugiat odio occaecati.

Atque ut exercitationem non esse sed quia ipsum. Officia quaerat vel id rem. Suscipit eaque explicabo repudiandae vel tempore et. Non necessitatibus illum facilis quia sit dolorum tenetur est. Soluta rerum officia aut excepturi inventore est. Nihil dicta totam et sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”