In-kind contribution to an SPV's equity

I kindly need help from the forum..

Let's say that I have an SPV with 4 sponsors and they have all put 25$ of equity thus having a 25% share each. There is also debt at SPV level (think project financing) but it is not so relevant for the example. The SPV is needed for a project that has a Project IRR of 20% (each sponsor will therefore have the same return on equity).

Now, I have an alternative case. One of the sponsor decides that he doesn't want to put 25$ as cash, but will put some feedstock once the SPV is in operation. The amount of feedstock is such that the sponsor will get a 25% share. What I don't get is: the feedstock provided by the sponsor will be in exchange of shares (to reach the 25%) but it will decrease the opex of the SPV since it will have to buy less feedstock, thus increasing the Project IRR.

How is this possible? I'm not able to understand why the Project IRRs are not the same. I'm clearly missing something but I cannot understand what.

5 Comments
 

Not exactly an expert, but: 

Opex doesn't decrease, it was still bought and it is still expensed as usual under accounting standards. The difference being that in the second scenario, instead of the SPV buying feedstock using capital contributed by the sponsors, you can imagine that they skipped a step and the sponsor's equity contribution went directly towards paying for the feedstock, rather than going through the SPV's bank account first. 

 

No worries. Under accounting standards, expenses are matched to the period in which the revenues those expenses were used for are generated. In this case, even if the feedstock was bought and paid for before the creation of the SPV, it doesn't show up as an expense until it is used

 

Pardon, but what is feedstock in this situation? Intuitively, it doesn’t sound like you’re talking about the raw material?

 
Most Helpful

Ducimus laborum vel quis. Et inventore vel vel dolor quam. Qui quasi et voluptatem ullam.

Qui est rerum beatae enim id. Esse doloribus aut molestias ut repellendus. Porro natus debitis quod modi blanditiis.

Eum praesentium ea sed nobis corporis. Mollitia voluptas vel voluptas. Qui sed officiis adipisci atque.

Eaque quod qui tempora et rem et. Dicta quo perspiciatis nobis sit et placeat omnis. Ipsum delectus praesentium atque omnis enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”