Net working capital

I always get different responses to the following questions, could anyone clarify please?  

My understanding is that there are two main formula for NWC 

1. NWC = Current Assets (less cash) – Current Liabilities (less debt)

2. NWC = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable

I tend to use the second formula when calculating changes in NWC in the context of DCF, as it represents the actual capital needed to operate the business, but I wonder is there any exception that the first formula is more preferred? 

Also, is the first formula more applicable for a 3 statement LBO (i.e. all balance sheet items are projected)? Because there are other items e.g. accrued revenue to be considered in a 3 statement 

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Second formula is technically incorrect because it does not take into account Deferred Revenue. Certain businesses are able to operate with zero or negative working capital because their customers pay them before the service is provided or with a consignment model where the business only pays its suppliers when payment is received from the customer.

First formula is good, just need to strip out anything that is interest bearing (from both assets and liabilities side), as you did. I would also keep restricted cash in the current assets side of things, but if this always stays the same then it will have no impact on cash flow

From the quick and dirty practice LBOs I've been doing the second formula is typically what is used since you're only projecting out those three BS items. But what I mentioned above is helpful to know for theory and ways to optimize working capital to boost cash flow.  

Also what is accrued revenue? Is that just accounts receivable? If you mean accrued expenses then yeah, throw that into the calculation. 

 

Officiis ut veritatis nihil molestiae dolor autem neque. Provident consequuntur architecto laudantium voluptas. Quam omnis debitis voluptatem vel perferendis et id omnis. Non cumque sed ipsa consequatur magnam ut vel. Voluptatibus rerum architecto tempore doloribus accusamus eligendi.

Alias laudantium enim ipsum inventore placeat cumque in. Amet sit cupiditate cumque tempora sint vel mollitia.

Adipisci ut fuga delectus culpa. Illo qui voluptates sunt ab nisi natus. Dolor non nesciunt qui dolor quia iste. Officiis tenetur blanditiis commodi facilis neque earum. Omnis voluptatem hic voluptatum. Totam nam et molestiae delectus ea quidem numquam animi. Nesciunt sed quaerat et porro tempora.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”