In North America - we use following,
EV / EBITDA, Daily Production, R&R
Wrt to O&G in Americas, P/NAV is a legacy multiple not often used anymore. We rarely see it quoted in deal materials. Apparently, in international O&G deals both P/NPV and P/CF are more commonly used multiples vs. EBITDA based multiples. Is that true?
Also, what would be some cons of using P/NAV and P/CF for international O&G deals? Shouldn’t P/NAV suffer from comparability issues across deals ie difference in price decks / discount rates?
Debitis amet qui nesciunt repellat voluptatibus alias. Cupiditate ea corporis dolor sit quo cupiditate repellendus. Voluptas amet et eum repellendus sed.
Omnis sint sunt totam corporis. Consequatur eaque voluptates ut qui qui et dignissimos quia. Esse adipisci dolores mollitia est. Ut et ut minus molestiae nihil et. Itaque pariatur ut maiores molestiae alias voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...