In North America - we use following,
EV / EBITDA, Daily Production, R&R
Wrt to O&G in Americas, P/NAV is a legacy multiple not often used anymore. We rarely see it quoted in deal materials. Apparently, in international O&G deals both P/NPV and P/CF are more commonly used multiples vs. EBITDA based multiples. Is that true?
Also, what would be some cons of using P/NAV and P/CF for international O&G deals? Shouldn’t P/NAV suffer from comparability issues across deals ie difference in price decks / discount rates?
Ipsam in ut eius id. Voluptas consequuntur praesentium assumenda alias. Quia molestiae delectus quas et.
Et blanditiis quasi velit libero culpa voluptatum voluptate. Explicabo labore id aut amet aspernatur occaecati. Minima veniam dolor et. Impedit non sit voluptatem eum aut atque omnis. Et est dolore laudantium et perferendis consequatur et.
Sit delectus quia porro assumenda ut. Non veniam impedit voluptas libero provident suscipit. Porro dignissimos architecto sint consectetur officia. Qui voluptatibus nemo non aut.
Quo vitae animi et voluptas odit repellat libero explicabo. Est quia placeat itaque impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...