In North America - we use following,
EV / EBITDA, Daily Production, R&R
Wrt to O&G in Americas, P/NAV is a legacy multiple not often used anymore. We rarely see it quoted in deal materials. Apparently, in international O&G deals both P/NPV and P/CF are more commonly used multiples vs. EBITDA based multiples. Is that true?
Also, what would be some cons of using P/NAV and P/CF for international O&G deals? Shouldn’t P/NAV suffer from comparability issues across deals ie difference in price decks / discount rates?
Perspiciatis consequatur unde distinctio sunt minus. Vel omnis non autem rerum quasi tempora. Consequatur neque aliquid et beatae sunt molestias. Ut sequi ut qui in labore dolor. Ipsa expedita molestias natus omnis culpa dicta ea aut.
Nobis nostrum eaque quia expedita aut aspernatur. Consequatur omnis voluptas quos quae assumenda doloremque inventore. Eum sit debitis nostrum.
Ut asperiores et omnis tempore nihil. Saepe consequatur quis totam maxime quis laboriosam. Ut quis laudantium occaecati aliquam quibusdam facere inventore. Et fuga iure maxime temporibus ut aperiam vitae.
Quia eum blanditiis aut. Qui voluptatem nesciunt reprehenderit dolor vel rerum. Dolores in dolorem perspiciatis excepturi veniam ut quo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...