In North America - we use following,
EV / EBITDA, Daily Production, R&R
Wrt to O&G in Americas, P/NAV is a legacy multiple not often used anymore. We rarely see it quoted in deal materials. Apparently, in international O&G deals both P/NPV and P/CF are more commonly used multiples vs. EBITDA based multiples. Is that true?
Also, what would be some cons of using P/NAV and P/CF for international O&G deals? Shouldn’t P/NAV suffer from comparability issues across deals ie difference in price decks / discount rates?
Atque est distinctio repellendus aut. Libero consectetur iste repudiandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...