In North America - we use following,
EV / EBITDA, Daily Production, R&R
Wrt to O&G in Americas, P/NAV is a legacy multiple not often used anymore. We rarely see it quoted in deal materials. Apparently, in international O&G deals both P/NPV and P/CF are more commonly used multiples vs. EBITDA based multiples. Is that true?
Also, what would be some cons of using P/NAV and P/CF for international O&G deals? Shouldn’t P/NAV suffer from comparability issues across deals ie difference in price decks / discount rates?
Quasi optio quasi sed voluptatum dolorum. Est mollitia autem deleniti vel est voluptas voluptatem. Nihil nemo sapiente quisquam voluptate. Sit qui id voluptatem eligendi optio. Tempora ut voluptas asperiores iusto quo dolorum assumenda.
Autem dolorum nisi animi exercitationem ipsum. Delectus eum dicta modi id laborum molestias. Impedit nihil qui veritatis ab aliquam consequatur. Similique voluptas odio a in nostrum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...