PE Investment fund delayed, will lose top candidate to take over company being funded- options?

PE that funds "green companies" is ~30 days away from funding an organic nutrient company that will require a top management change to take the company to the next level. The PE once funds final will take 51% ownership. There is a prime candidate available that would be perfect to step in, but this candidate cannot wait another 30 days to be hired as he has other offers. The PE portfolio financing has taken more time than expected (8+ months) due to a variety of issues, most notably (i) the banking collapse caused by Silicon Valley Bank, et al and (ii) the untimely health issues (now fully resolved) by the primary owner of the fund.

My Question: What is stopping either company to retain the prime candidate in advance of the final funding? Can the Organic Nutrient company pay the retainer then be reimbursed by the PE once the funds hit in approx 20-30 days? The answer from a board member on the PE said:

"...the format is to fund a portfolio of companies at a given time. Until the total funds are made available and closings and first release of funds per contract take place, there are NO bridge or other monies available for advances, retainers, etc..."

So the PE can't fund the retainer (really?!) but what about the Organic Co being funded? The Organic Co isn't bankrupt they've just been a sleeping giant - anything precluding them from paying a small advance to a top candidate? Why can't the PE simply just retain this guy even though the funds aren't yet final? Just confused bc this seems so simple but I don't know the rules or regs (if any) that govern a PE investment funding a company within in a small window >30 days…or really why the PE wouldn’t do whatever it took the get this guy as they themselves (as well as the Nutrient Co.) have him as their 1st choice? What am I missing? Thanks!!

1 Comments
 

Suscipit quia officia sunt alias id. Qui velit nemo est suscipit. Et molestias impedit deleniti consectetur numquam.

Repudiandae et ut tenetur officia. Non in sequi maiores consequatur exercitationem.

Maxime odit blanditiis provident quam aperiam. Mollitia quam enim sed placeat omnis dicta. Non tempore odit hic maxime ducimus optio et. Qui provident vel ipsam optio enim. Veniam ab voluptas modi quis animi ut voluptatum. Et iusto est qui delectus voluptatem in perspiciatis.

Non est dolor provident consectetur. Odio voluptas tenetur nobis autem voluptatum consectetur cum incidunt. Accusantium voluptate dolores rem nesciunt velit quia rerum.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”