Prospects have gotten so soft

Saw a thread recently complaining about his EB's culture. Would prospects these days prefer to work 80-90 hours/week at Centerview/EVR and make 210k+ in their first year, or work 75-85 hours/week at Barclays and make 140k? 

I'd rather work 2 more hours a day for $70k more, but that's just me...

34 Comments
 

Two hours a day is a MASSIVE difference when you’re working that much. It’s like watching a movie every day or a nice dinner with your friends/family. It’s having the time to work out or have a hobby. Sleep deprivation versus being well rested. You’re definitely entitled to your preference but 2 hours less a day is nothing to be underplayed, especially when your free time becomes marginally so much more valuable.

 

If you're trying to maximize your career earnings you need to think about your career as a marathon rather than a sprint. Sure, an additional 70k a year seems like a lot especially adjusting for TV of money, but if the additional hours burn you out then you would've been better off sticking with a bank with a better lifestyle because, in the grand of scheme of things, if you're able to stick it out in finance, the 70k will eventually look like a rounding error

 
Most Helpful

In a few years, you'll look back at this post and realize how you foolish you were to chase extra hours - all for the sake of supposed prestige (prestige that no one outside of this forum cares about - the average person on the street still thinks you are a stock broker at Charles Schwab).

There is nothing honorable or prestigious about working sweaty hours. And to quote someone wiser than me: you do not go to your deathbed with your deal toys.

Work with good people, try to work on interesting deals, spend time with loved ones and make an effort to call your parents. The rest is just noise.

 

It’s not for more prestige it’s for more money, idc about prestige. 

You're young (22), don't have kids, etc. and you don't wanna grind? Then why enter into IB in the first place?

 

"Grind" doesn't mean putting out 100 work weeks: that's just poor efficiency, bad for heath and simply unnecessary. The work you do from 9pm-1am (4 hours) can be done just as well from 8am-9am (1 hour).

In my experience, MDs/staffers that make analysts work 90-100 hour weeks have the mentality of "an asshole treated me like this when I was an analyst, so I need to exact revenge and grind these fresh grads as hard as possible." If that's your cup for tea and would like to earn a few extra bucks this way, go right ahead.

Ps I'm on the buyside now and people don't read decks/review models that you send at midnight (we are sleeping). We also don't read 80%+ of pages you put out. Have fun "grinding" - hope it's all worth it.

 

Honestly, if it’s the difference between sleeping at 2am or 4am every night, one feels somewhat sustainable and the other just isn’t. Or the difference between having a Saturday off or working 7 days a week with zero recharge.

But you can do whatever you like. If you want to go for the latter so badly, you should be happy you have less competition.

Also — not sure why you’re saying prospects when it’s really all FTs telling the prospect that we disagree.

 

I think most people commenting on here are wrong. You can't compare 2 roles purely by 'hours' and salary/prestige.

OP, no offense but you're listed as a prospect so that means you've probably never worked a day in your life so don't tell people at Barclays who've worked their arses off for underwhelming  pay that they're soft, you have no right to speak on this.

People seem to misunderstand that in the grand scheme of things 70k is not alot of money. Post tax these days youd be lucky to get 35k, which buys f all. 

I was lucky enough to have offers from a top tier BB and 3 EBs, in the end I took an EB offer which was not the highest paying (excepted about 20k less). I took it because because WLB was supposedly slightly better and team culture was  considerably better. I'm also confident that when the time comes I'll have better exit options from this role. At the end of the day I work with people I like and respect in an environment I enjoy for very good money which is setting me up for exits I want. Focusing only on prestige and salary in the short term will f your life and career but on the flip side "sweatshop" EBs often have more interesting work and very often better or equivalent exits to EBs.

 

I agree with you here, I’m just confused how this greatly differs from the majority opinion here and makes everyone wrong?

I think if you’re saying that OP made a oversimplification that isn’t even true when it comes to BBs/EBs, we all know that but entertained simply his concept of “would you work an extra 2 hours a day for 70k?” Ignorant “prospect” isn’t going to understand the nuance around culture and opportunity anyways.

 

I see the majority opinion as being prioritising WLB in the short term over most all other factors. I turned down an offer I knew would have less hours because of comp. and exits, which I view as a longer term investment which will pay off after 2-4 years which I think is largely ignored with a focus on working 10-15 less (very hard) hours per week.

 

Maiores voluptatem deserunt eos dignissimos eius. Et commodi asperiores animi qui et tempore rerum molestiae. Ex aut maiores ea mollitia aliquid recusandae repellendus repellat.

Ut minus quibusdam facere eos. Ut quia commodi odit. Animi est dolorum accusantium totam. Excepturi laboriosam qui magni nulla et dolorem sit.

 

In consequatur esse exercitationem ut qui necessitatibus voluptate. Rerum commodi aut sed libero perspiciatis est iure. Ab et voluptatem vitae aut facilis.

Ipsa quam dolorem esse eveniet reprehenderit. At vitae ut esse consequatur in autem facilis. Dolore ut rerum explicabo et aut. Ullam praesentium officia dolor quas reprehenderit ipsa consequatur vitae. Quia fugiat eius eos temporibus. Nemo non reprehenderit occaecati a. Velit distinctio hic placeat et delectus.

Nulla velit eius dolorem pariatur iure quae. Libero excepturi iste voluptates consectetur. Similique optio dolorum commodi molestiae est voluptates.

Cumque corporis atque qui dolorem perspiciatis. Dolore dolores sapiente beatae dolores quo ut sit. Velit ab dolore magnam fugit architecto animi. Natus quia nulla natus. Et laudantium sit et suscipit delectus perspiciatis aut. Consequatur ut harum culpa sequi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”