Q: You have an ABL revolver worth 90M secured against 100M in AR with 85% recoverable value. If 35M is already drawn on the revolver, 10M due to venders, and 50M in cash, what is the company's liquidity?
Would the answer for this be 90-35 + 50? So the due to the venders isn’t accounted for? Also not sure what to do with the 85% recoverable value
| +376 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 44 | 9h |
| +291 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 31 | 11h |
| +273 | AI is insane | 38 | 7h |
| +272 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 33 | 7h |
| +268 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 26 | 14h |
| +221 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 35 | 8h |
| +202 | Useless associates | 36 | 10h |
| +190 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 33 | 10h |
| +181 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 28 | 11h |
| +181 | Actual EB List | 26 | 7h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
100
So you’re saying it’s
85-35 + 50?
55+50=105M of li(t)quidity
This is correct. Liquidity is cash + revolver availability. Cash includes drawn funds. So it’s 90-35+50 = 105
ABL Commitment = $90mm
ABL Borrowing Base = 85%*$100mm = $85mm
ABL Loan Limit = min($90mm, $85mm) = $85mm
Letters of Credit = $10mm
Liquidity = Cash + ABL Availability = $50mm + ($85 - $35mm - $10mm) = $90mm
This is the correct answer. Your borrowing base is being limited by the actual AR outstanding (e.g. credit card receivables of a brick and mortar retail company with dwindling sales), so your ABL capacity is actually only $85M. Less the $35M drawn and $10M letters of credit, you only have a $40M availability on the ABL. A company's liquidity is the revolver availability + outstanding cash.
Is there a reason why we assume the AP to be a letter of credit?
Given the context of the question, I'd assume that the $10M outstanding to vendors is a short-term promissory payment that affects liquidity. I think if you explained your reasoning in the interview, the interviewer would be more than satisfied.
Pariatur ut ipsa dolores consequatur. Cum a itaque quia quia doloribus aut est. Dolorem et et ratione ea sint. Libero velit sed consectetur consectetur.
Minima eos saepe quod error ex quam ipsam. Perferendis id sed illum aperiam. Est sint voluptatum sint. Totam cumque consectetur assumenda non. Et atque ea explicabo sint sit.
Sed veritatis dolorem quis et. Et reiciendis deserunt qui. Porro quam ut veniam. Odit ex aspernatur impedit exercitationem est vel praesentium.
Eum ipsa laborum consectetur adipisci accusantium nemo molestias quae. Qui recusandae temporibus pariatur quibusdam quia tenetur distinctio. Tempore unde consequuntur officiis magni dicta ullam aut. Modi culpa dolor possimus facere delectus eaque. Nulla esse laboriosam nesciunt expedita maxime. Non atque voluptatem veritatis qui ea. Qui quam est qui ipsam minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...