Should you switch doors?

you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors:

behind one door is a million dollars and the others are empty. You pick Door 1 and the host opens Door 3 to reveal an empty room. You're given the option to switch doors.

Assuming the host knows which door has money, should you switch doors?

15 Comments
 

yes. when you make your original decision, you have 1/3 probability of choosing correctly (payoff = 1000000/3). after he eliminates a door not chosen, the probability of staying with your original choice doesn;t change, while the joint probability of the other two doors is 2/3. with one of those choices eliminated, there is only one other choice to make and your payoff function becomes 2000000/3. haven't you ever seen 21

 
IlliniProgrammerIt there is a 2/3 chance you pick the wrong door.
not necessarily true.
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
happypantsmcgee
IlliniProgrammerIt there is a 2/3 chance you pick the wrong door.
not necessarily true.
Out of three doors without any other information? The odds of picking the right door are one in three.

Let's try a thought experiment with 1 million doors. Monty reveals that there's goats behind 999,998. Now all that's left is your door and this other one that's randomly left unopened. Do you switch now? Bear in mind, 99.9999% chance you picked the wrong door.

 

When you first picked the door: 1/3rd chance of winning

If you switch: your chance of winning is 2/3 --if you pick the right door (1 out of 3 times), and one empty door is revealed, switching means you lose 100% of the time --If you pick the wrong door (2 out of 3 times), and one empty door is revealed, then switching means you win 100% of the time

1/3x0 + 2/3x1=2/3

slightly counterintuitive at first

 

Dude, I think he just misread my post. I have a tendancy to finish thoughts midsentence and not give a lot of context.

Regardless, I've gotten into a debate with two quants- one with a Math PhD- and a number of other really smart folks on this. The 2/3 number is pretty controversial. Perhaps when- err, if- you get a job in industry, you'll actually be able to tell what actually makes someone a retard or not.

 
Best Response
IlliniProgrammerDude, I think he just misread my post. I have a tendancy to finish thoughts midsentence and not give a lot of context.

Regardless, I've gotten into a debate with two quants- one with a Math PhD- and a number of other really smart folks on this. The 2/3 number is pretty controversial. Perhaps when- err, if- you get a job in industry, you'll actually be able to tell what actually makes someone a retard or not.

The 2/3 probability is not controversial at all if the car's location is random. The odds that you pick the right door if you switch is 2/3.

If the car's location is arbitrary then you can't really say that it's 2/3. But I think the problem is usually stated as the car being behind a random door (i.e. uniform). In which case, since the car's location is random, you have a 1/3 chance of picking it originally. If you don't pick the car (2/3), then the host must reveal the only other goat door with certainty, so you have 2/3 odds of getting the car when you switch.

EDIT: The wiki article confirms:" Although not explicitly stated in this version, solutions are often based on the additional assumptions that the car is initially equally likely to be behind each door". With this assumption, the solution is clearly correct.

 

Quam et ipsa ea est adipisci est. Aut nam ex aut repudiandae eum suscipit. Et necessitatibus illum corrupti dicta est laborum fugit.

Et autem et saepe occaecati et. Et eveniet laudantium sequi porro numquam. Aut voluptate incidunt rerum consequatur voluptatem quia occaecati. Hic eos laborum voluptatem possimus. Iure amet eum inventore molestias tempora rerum.

Quas autem aut placeat tempora. Qui sed laboriosam ut eveniet aspernatur.

Ea amet nemo molestias pariatur rem et ut. Architecto architecto praesentium eum cupiditate sed. Repellendus id sint corrupti ab minima eos quia modi. Expedita quae ipsum dolores aut voluptatem et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”